"“Gary, how did they do this without me knowing?” I asked. “I don’t know how Debbie relates to the officers,” Gary said. He described the party as fully under the control of Hillary’s campaign, which seemed to confirm the su ions of the Bernie camp. The campaign had the DNC on life support, giving it money every month to meet its basic expenses, while the campaign was using the party as a fund-raising clearinghouse. Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party’s national committee.
Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund—that figure represented $10,000 to each of the 32 states’ parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement—$320,000—and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn."
https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ks-2016-215774
So isn't Donna afraid of repercussions (as far as jobs/positions)? Won't she be blacklisted among Democrats?
what jobs? DNC is bankrupt
She will make a bundle on her book plus she felt mistreated by her own party after the leaks
Her ffattaz was fed up
Why don't assholes like hater don't post any articles about the many $Bs, of oligarchy dark money given to rightwing, racist "social welfare orgs" created in reaction to American electing a knitter in 2008?
or about the oligarchy's rulings that "corporations are people" and "money is speech" ?
Why do you deflect? The topic of this thread should be something you as a Bernie supporter should be upset about - instead you're attacking him for posting what should be big news. Just like the SJW thread - indefensible but you guys want to gloss over.
story from Politico in May 2016 revealed how the Clinton campaign setup a fundraising operation through state party apparatuses that was essentially money laundering. States only kept less than a half percent of $82 million raised. This was a method to cir vent campaign finance limits. It also put Sanders at a disadvantage, as the state parties weren’t fairly making these funds available to his campaign.
One of the few Democrats to recognize reality was Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren. She appeared on CNN and emphatically answered, “Yes,” when asked if she thought the DNC rigged the primary. She said the Democratic Party needed to be “held accountable.”
And people wonder why she set up her private server - it's who knows what along with all these back door deals and shenanigans.
Hillary Rosen, a prominent Democratic Party strategist who regularly appears on CNN, insisted Democrats could not reckon with Brazile’s allegations when attention must be paid to the GOP’s tax proposals. She also misleadingly argued Brazile could not find any evidence that the system was rigged against Sanders, which is not what Brazile wrote. Brazile said she could not find any evidence to support widespread claims until she came across the joint fundraising agreement.
“The voters chose Hillary Clinton, not Bernie Sanders, and it had nothing to do with any staff person at the DNC,” Rosen asserted.
In May 2016, Rosen said, “Bernie Sanders is losing this race, and instead of taking it like a man, he’s working the ref. He’s encouraging his people to think that the system is rigged. The system he signed up for as an independent to run in a Democratic primary. This constant sort of whining and complaining about the process is just really the most harmful thing, in some ways, he could do because he’s encouraging his supporters to think that the process actually is cheating them, and they’re not.” So, Rosen has an interest in maintaining her denial of reality.
The reality is hundreds of superdelegates pledged their allegiance to Clinton before votes were cast in Iowa, a limited number of debates were scheduled to ensure voters had the least amount of exposure to Clinton opponents, the DNC and Clinton campaign falsely accused the Sanders campaign of “stealing” voter file data, and Democratic women supporting Sanders faced forms of retaliation for not supporting Clinton.
Looks like the shills trying to do damage control
The damage has already been done. Democraps are finished for 2018. They deserve it
Why aren't ordinary Democrats demanding that the DNC do away with the super delegates?
Boom
Greenwald with the tomahawk
Donna likely has a higher standard of living than she can afford after losing her CNN role. There's no money in the echo chamber racket, but there is money if you go the controversial route. Donna did just that. Look for Fox News to offer her a position soon.
DNC, Dems doesn't pay any more attn to citizens than the RNC, Repugs.
Citizens have the votes the parties want. If there is enough outcry (or I guess, losses), change will happen.
no change is possible.
That Obama was progressive is a joke, as was Bill Clintion's progressiveness.
Both parties are d and corrupted by BigMoney.
GAMEOVER
Neither party legislates, regulates, policy-implements what their bases prefer.
So what? We just roll over and give up if game is over?
yep, GAMEOVER.
America is ed and un able, and the Repugs and their Useful Idiot Trash will harder and deeper until 2020.
ITS DRUMPF FALSE FLAG HES IN BED WITH PUTIN HILLARY LOST MOVE ON
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
