OK, McSenile, tell us again dubya has won iraq

[boutons_]

Bomb Attacks in Baghdad and Kirkuk Kill Dozens


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/wo...29iraq.html?hp

Meanwhile, IRaq will be defaced for decades by failed MIC-ripoff projects:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0..._n_115352.html

plus millions of tons of military junk the US will leave behind.

you're doing a heckuva job, dubya. How are those oilco profits coming along?

And $Bs more MIC profits coming soon and for decades:

Iraq: Poised to Explode

http://www.truthout.org/article/iraq-poised-explode?print
The election is about the Iraq war and dubya, is why McSenile is DOA.

[Nbadan]

Iraqis killing Americans = no success
Iraqis killing other Iraqis = success!

....see the logic!

[JoeChalupa]

I don't remember McCain ever saying the Iraq war had been won. Did he?

[clambake]

it was meant to be a "pocket lining" endeavor, so it can be called a success.

as far as the war being won........wait til you see what lurks under the iraq surface. we can't keep paying them forever not to kill us.

[Nbadan]

LOS ANGELES, California (CNN) -- Sen. John McCain could support a 16-month timetable for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq, he told CNN's Larry King Monday night.

But the presumptive Republican presidential nominee said he would only do that if military chiefs deemed the "conditions on the ground" safe enough.

Speaking from Bakersfield, California, the Arizona senator said he would not stick to a "hard and firm date" suggested by Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.

"Now whether that fits into 16 months or not, or one month, or whatever, the point is it's got to be conditions-based," he added, saying that's the point Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. commander in Iraq, "is trying to get over as we go into this political season."

Asked whether he would support an invasion of Iraq again, McCain responded: "The fact that Saddam Hussein was bent on acquiring weapons of mass destruction. ... I think we did the right thing."

CNN


Now he supports a timetable

[boutons_]

McSenile, simplistically, claims victory for the surge.
(He'll never miss his target when talking stupidly down to Americans.)

McSenile claims the surge was his idea, and "I know how to win wars" (but he's never won a war nor fought in war that was won)

McSenile's msg is the same as neo-c*nt/WH/Repug propaganda has been, "we are winning, absolutely".

McSenile has lashed himself to the white Iraqi whale, thinking it's a winner, but it's a loser.

[Gino]

McSenile, simplistically, claims victory for the surge.
(He'll never miss his target when talking stupidly down to Americans.)

McSenile claims the surge was his idea, and "I know how to win wars" (but he's never won a war nor fought in war that was won)

McSenile's msg is the same as neo-c*nt/WH/Repug propaganda has been, "we are winning, absolutely".

McSenile has lashed himself to the white Iraqi whale, thinking it's a winner, but it's a loser.

The irony of this situation is quite comical.

Liberals claim they want peace, yet they've positioned themselves politically so that any news of death or destruction in Iraq is GOOD news for them.

[Cry Havoc]

The irony of this situation is quite comical.

Liberals claim they want peace, yet they've positioned themselves politically so that any news of death or destruction in Iraq is GOOD news for them.

Because it displays exactly how catastrophic war is?

It's not good news, it's vindication.