Reply With Quote
Keep living up that 2008 ecstasy. You got about 2 weeks left
The Mighty Boston Celtics are mother in back. Today we're delivering another beatdown of epic proportions.
Keep living up that 2008 ecstasy. You got about 2 weeks left
Lookit stick, your team just doesn't have the class, the will, or the power to take on the mighty Boston Celtics. I suggest you do what LA fans do best and jump on another bandwagon. Maybe start watching Galaxy games or some .
Blessings getting the customary preliminary ownage before the Kelts destroy the Lakers yet again
The Celtics were the worst or close to the worst team in basketball for so many years. Even when Pierce was on the team they sucked really badly. For 15 years they never won 50 games. In 2007 they won 24 games. Other years they won 15 and 19 games.
Where were you then Masshole? Waiting for the 2008 bandwagon to jump on?
Now they win one ring two years ago and everyone should be afraid. Just goes to show someone doesn't remember how bad the Celtics were for so long.
Last edited by namlook; 06-03-2010 at 03:15 AM.
The Celtics were the worst or close to the worst team in basketball for so many years. Even when Pierce was on the team they sucked really badly. In 2007 they won 24 games. Where were you then Masshole?
Now they win one ring two years ago and everyone should be afraid.
You could kind of say the same about the lakers during their slump but both teams are deadly atm. Lakers >> celtics.
Lakers in 6*
LAKERS must die an unforgiving,slow,brutal death.
CELTICS in 7
Say Queensbridge.
LAKERS must die an unforgiving,slow,brutal death.
CELTICS in 7
No comparison. The Celtics sucked for 15 years in a row! The Lakers had a couple subpar years and they never sunk to winning only 15 games.
Last edited by namlook; 06-03-2010 at 03:24 AM.
Comparing whose smells nicer huh?
It's called maintaining consistency in winning and minimizing dry spells. It's something the Lakers franchise have done and the Celtics have not.
Masshole forgets the depths where the Celtics came from which is what bandwagon fans do.
Kobe MVP chants at the Garden
Kobe losing to teams led by Ben Wallace/KG/Rondo in the Finals
The current record between the Kelts and Fakers is 9-2. Now if you don't want to call it ownage, then I don't know what will.The Celtics were the worst or close to the worst team in basketball for so many years. Even when Pierce was on the team they sucked really badly. For 15 years they never won 50 games. In 2007 they won 24 games. Other years they won 15 and 19 games.
Where were you then Masshole? Waiting for the 2008 bandwagon to jump on?
Now they win one ring two years ago and everyone should be afraid. Just goes to show someone doesn't remember how bad the Celtics were for so long.
lol 9-2
You guys won a ton of championships in the 90's, no doubt.
LOL 8-3The current record between the Kelts and Fakers is 9-2. Now if you don't want to call it ownage, then I don't know what will.
lol 9-2
Ownage it is. Hard to argue that point.The current record between the Kelts and Fakers is 9-2. Now if you don't want to call it ownage, then I don't know what will.
lol 9-2
funny...now MAINTAINING CONSISTENCY---is the operative word(s) here--
but when the spurs did that---all lakers fans talked about was ---REPEATING---
---because you fellows have failed chronologically to repeat. You got those 3, 3 & half rings, but, you've always fallen face ass down in the caca when you've defended those 3 1/2.
The Lakers put the Celtics out of their misery in '87 and the Celtics didn't see light for 20 years. That must be disclosed here.
lol @ 2006Kobe losing to teams led by Ben Wallace/KG/Rondo in the Finals
lol @ 2007
lol @ 2008
lol @ 2009
lol @ 2010
it, lol @ 1981-2010
The Celtics are the favorites in this series. The advantage that the Lakers have against the rest of the league (bigs), they don't have that advantage over Boston.
Well, 12 hours from now we're gonna see precisely where the bear in the buckwheat. And if it's like Luva says it's gonna be I'm gonna crawl up in somebody's and play dead.
& I ain't in' around.
Savvy?
Lakers in six. Hard to say that.
These aren't the 2008 Lakers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
