Democrats are so screwed.
Democrats are so screwed.
Yeah, Geraldine Ferraro is gonna start campaigning with Palin tomorrow...
![]()
She was terrific.
Holy , it's a Yoni sighting....
I figured you'd return for the election.
George W's former writers were.![]()
Did'ja now?
You think Obama wrote his speech? , his Vice Presidential candidate is a bigger plagiarist than I.
I wouldn't say that...but she did very, very well.
In just this week, I had a Murphy sighting and a Yoni sighting. Gtown is here under another name.
It feels like home. It feels like home.
Well I have to disagree with you. I think this will blow up in her face with the arrogant trash talking that she did tonight. Did she give us any facts, we know she told lies about cutting taxes, about the bridge to no where those facts will come out and then this speech will not turn out so well.
Oh, I would...wait, I did.
, even the New York Times has written an op-ed that is pro-Palin:
Well put, New York Times! How very enlightened of you!
Oh wait! They wrote that in 1984, championing Geraldine Ferarro, but I think their powerful words have stood the test of time. Don't you?
I wonder if they'll re-print the op-ed...
I doubt Obama was using current PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH's speech writers to write a speech talking about going into Washington and changing it.
You ing republicans will eat anything up, won't yeah.
Are you really this stupid? Or is this just an act? Speech writers write speeches. If the speech was indeed written by GWB's writers it just means that they are good speech writers. Big. ing. Deal.
So, said words are hollow?
Gotcha.
Like I said. Republicans will eat up like every time you throw it at them.
Speechwriting is a job. It's a skill you market...some are better than others. Are you suggesting that George W. Bush had input on the content?
It's a speech dumbass. Written by what appear to be good speechwriters. The words weren't hollow as they effectively reamed Obama a new one.
Aren't all politicians plagiarists? They are using words that aren't their own?
No, no more so than are Obama's -- who also employs speechwriters.
You got nothin'...tell Richie hi for me, 'kay?
It's a speech? No ass .
Though I get the feeling if said writers were bashing the Blazers and old man Oden you'd be in a corner somewhere crying while masturbating.
Well, basically the same thing you do each night when you realize your life is meaningless.
Nevertheless, those are empty words. The bashing comes from the writer and the "less government, we will change Washington" comes from the same writers.
Again, the republicans will eat is just...![]()
Again, no. The difference is with or without permission and with or without attribution. Biden used another's words without permission or attribution. By virtue of the employment contract, speechwriters give permission to use their words.
Next.
Palin was picked to attract disenfranchised Clinton supporters......that's why it's important for the right-wing echo-chamber to try and keep the blogosphere from painting her as a extremist, but facts like her association with a Alaska independence movement and her extreme religious views aren't things that will appeal to Clinton democrats....McCain should have done a better job vetting Palin before making this huge gamble...
Yes, however, unlike Plain who has her entire speech crafted out and written by former GW writers, Obama actually contributes to his speeches, puts his issues and his topics into them.
Palin probably asked the writers midway: "so, what exactly does a VP do anyway?"
Is that a La Bomba reference? K...You got nothin'...tell Richie hi for me, 'kay?
Bush's speech writers got him elected. Twice.
They should get a raise.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)