Reply With Quote
You forgot James White
Parker, Ginobili, Bowen 3
Horry, Barry, Udrih, D Robinson, Rose, Kerr 2
Finley, Oberto, Elson, Vaughn, Bonner, Mohammed, Brown, Nesterovic, Massenburg, S Jackson, G Robinson, Claxton, Willis, Ferry, Smith, Johnson, Elliott, J Jackson, Elie, Kersey, Daniels, Perdue, King 1
TOTAL = 32
That's more than Jordan
Jordan brought 30 people rings.
You forgot James White
and all the spurs staff :-)
Almost everyone in the organization gets one. My high school principal here in Southern California is some kind of west coast scout, and he has all 4 rings. He wears the 2007 one everyday, it's humungous.
Nice stat. It makes you realize how dominant he has been in one of the most compe ive eras in basketball.
+ Jackie Butler
A bit confused...Shouldn't Jordan have gotten his teammates at least 60 rings?
Edit: Nevermind just understood what you were saying. It is a great example of Duncan's greatness and his ability to adapt to a constantly changing team.
gooden and malik = 34
sorry ing stat line..
heres a real stat line....
Min/LA Lakers since 1949
210 championship rings <~~~ players only
"oh what was that but but but... you werent even there for the minny days and spurs have been there only since 73"
fine... since 72 the lakers have racked up 135 rings compared to 60* the spurs earned.
thats not including executives, coaches, chick hearn, or even jerry buss JUST players...
LOL
funny thing is the spurs have been around nearly as long as the lakers been in los angeles and they have JUST NOW started competing..... the bandwagoners quickly hop off the cowboys football bandwagon and jump on the basketball wagon to sport the black and silver jerseys, flags, and other gaudy crap for your baseline S....
^if you don't like it when people talk about the spurs, get out of the spurs forum. it's that simple.
4 rings, gotsorry ing stat line..
heres a real stat line....
Min/LA Lakers since 1949
210 championship rings <~~~ players only
"oh what was that but but but... you werent even there for the minny days and spurs have been there only since 73"
fine... since 72 the lakers have racked up 135 rings compared to 60* the spurs earned.
thats not including executives, coaches, chick hearn, or even jerry buss JUST players...
LOL
funny thing is the spurs have been around nearly as long as the lakers been in los angeles and they have JUST NOW started competing..... the bandwagoners quickly hop off the cowboys football bandwagon and jump on the basketball wagon to sport the black and silver jerseys, flags, and other gaudy crap for your baseline S....
135/15million people = 1 ring per 111,111 LA fans (not including non resident frontrunning bandwagoners)sorry ing stat line..
heres a real stat line....
Min/LA Lakers since 1949
210 championship rings <~~~ players only
"oh what was that but but but... you werent even there for the minny days and spurs have been there only since 73"
fine... since 72 the lakers have racked up 135 rings compared to 60* the spurs earned.
thats not including executives, coaches, chick hearn, or even jerry buss JUST players...
LOL
funny thing is the spurs have been around nearly as long as the lakers been in los angeles and they have JUST NOW started competing..... the bandwagoners quickly hop off the cowboys football bandwagon and jump on the basketball wagon to sport the black and silver jerseys, flags, and other gaudy crap for your baseline S....
60/1million people = 1 ring per 16,666 fans...
You are the basketball equivalent of a locust.
you succeed at making no sense what so ever!!!!!
sure!!!!..... now all you have to do is wait another 30 years to get 4 more
I'm big fan of TD.Sure He's the best player of the NBA last ten years but I can't understand what you want to say.
MJ was the best player I saw and i'm sure I never will see someone better.IMO The best basketball player of the history by far.
I can't talk about Russel or Chamberlain because to win in the 60's was more easy when basketball wasn't as popular in the world or in the USA and there was a lot of white boys in the NBA,obviously not because white players were better before than now.I'm sure Wilt or Bill wouldn't be better than Shaq or TD if they had played today.
But TD and MJ have at least one thing in common.They are able to made their teammates better than they really are (Pippen,Kerr,Amstrong,Perdue,Manu,Parker,Longley,N esterovic,Nazr,Bowen,Oberto,Bonner....)
A.Gaze and B.Williams from 99
just a quick google, and this is what i came up with...
i couldn't find numbers for every player.
but these are the rosters.
36 total.
2 Hopson
| 5 Paxson
| 10 Armstrong
| 14 Hodges
24 Cartwright |
32 Perdue |
33 Pippen |
34 King |
42 Williams |
53 Levingston |
54 Grant |
20 Hansen
6 Tucker
22 McCray
1 Brown
30 Buechler
35 Caffey
9 Harper
25 Kerr
7 Kukoc
13 Longley
00
Parish
91 Rodman
8 Simpkins
6 Steigenga
34 Wennington
18 Williams
Burrell
LaRue
Kleine
Booth
Vaughn
Edwards
Salley
Haley
i thought it was gonna be pictures of him wearing them...
i love duncan...
but you're not even mentioning the fact that jordan would have without a doubt won eight in a row if he never decided to play baseball.
you can't say the same thing about duncan (duncan didn't have the dominance that jordan had).
i have this poster in my living room
i would buy that jersey from you
no one is trying to compare us to the Lakers franchise, obviously its no contest all-time.
however im not sure you should be calling spurs fans bandwagon, most of us have been following this team for years before they even competed for their first le.
LA fans, meanwhile, are the only ones known to routinely boo their own team/players during hard times, they dont arrive till the 2nd quarter and leave halfway through the 4th
this argument is one of the most false that i often see here.
what Tim brings to his teamates is winning, because he's a great franchise player.
but a good part of his teamates indeed did better in others teams, mainly because they were only role players on the spurs (beno, rasho, Jackson.....).
to say that he makes tony and manu better than they really are is just false and Ducan's homers best argument.
Tony has just shown in these last games what he could do without Tim. and even with the really poor french national team, even if he lost being badly surrounded, he was awesome recently. i remember some haters saying tony without Tim is at Beno's level. Wake me up when beno put the numbers tony put these seven last games.
For Manu, i think i don't have to explain why he's a great player by himself: look at his results in Italy or with Argentina. He was succesful in every level. Tim wasn't in FIBA.
Manu and tony are great players by themselves. and they helped tim win three of his four rings too.
I'm sure every tim's teamates is thanksful with him because he gave them the most consistent and succesful franchise player of this decade. but he didn't make them better players.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
