Reply With Quote
We don't believe in dunks.
Why don't the Spurs run a play like that for RJ?
It's a play set that the Spurs run with everything except the dive cut that LBJ did that resulted in an uncontested dunk.
Yo Pop...you watching?
We don't believe in dunks.
Pop doesn't like dunkers....
we suck....
if we cna pull it off, we would still suck in D
Vidja?
thats so dumb
dunks = viewers = ratings = refs help you
cmon pop get ur head outta ur ass
Pop tolerates and allows dunks; he just doesn't tolerate his team showing up opponents before nor after the dunk.
They run plenty of plays for RJ but he doesnt have the sack to complete it like King Nothing
Dunks DO NOT win championships. BTW, it's only worth 2pts.
Look @ those screens 4 LBJ, that was a great gameplan.
they're the highest percentage shot in basketball.
If you can dunk all of your field goal attempts in a game...then you just might win the NBA le. However, bring realistic, it won't happen. Still worth 2 points in the real world.
Dunks are nice....yes.....but do not win games.
2pts? Dunks are a great way of telling the opposing teams Defense it Sucks!
I suppose you'd rather keep seeing RJ chuck up 22 footers? That's working really well right now ain't it?
The OP was simply suggesting that getting the ball to RJ while he's on the move is a better gameplan than what we've been seeing.
You're missing the point, but sure...if you say so.
you're suggesting that dunks are not more favorable than other shots, which is just not true. dunks make for a more efficient offense.
Why don't you clue me in? I'm utterly confused as to what you're getting at.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
