That was safely pulled out of your ass, yes.
I just had to write this as I heard the statistic. I don't even remember the number but the tag was "homeless sometime during the year"
OK. Does that include those who were moving, and lived in a motel or hotel for a day or more? By the wording, and standard journalist practices, I can safely assume it does!
That was safely pulled out of your ass, yes.
i'm normally homeless 8 to 5 mon-fri. and technically i've been homeless since i was 17. i've lived in an apartment ever since.
Home is where you hang your hat. I've been buying hats and hanging them everywhere across the world, just so that I'm never homeless.
Aren't opinions usually that? If that's what you want to call it, then yes. I also clearly pointed it oit as opinion with the word "assume."
What's your point?
Why don't you look up the definition of homelessness by those who report homelessness? Then you wouldn't be ignorant.
Place some light on my ignorance please.
I just did.
It's up to you do do something about it.
Will you do something about your own ignorance?
I'm not wasting my time over it. I presented an opinion. If you wish to show I'm wrong, the do so, or shut the up.
If you wish to show you're right, you're free to do that too.
I don't care if I am wrong. It's a formed opinion based on the available facts, and I know I could be wrong. I'm not devoting that much time to it. I already spent more time on the computer than I wanted to today. Unlike Chump, I have better things to do.
I will keep my opinion unless someone wishes to show me otherwise. The fact he hasn't linked the definition tells me he's talking out his ass.
It took me a few seconds to google the definition; it was literally the first hit.
You would rather waste your time defending your ignorance than spend ten seconds eliminating it.
What facts were those?
I've noticed a familiar pattern in WC's posts: post an opinion as fact, get called out by other posters to support said opinion, followed by a challenge by WC to the other posters to disprove said opinion, followed by a statement by WC that finding supporting evidence is a waste of his time.
Produce your evidence or shut up. It is my opinion. That doesn't matter if I source it. Besides, I stated what my opinion was based on already.
You ing idiot.
I never claimed it was fact. I have clearly stated it as opinion.
Why am I wasting my time with morons... Where did that IGNORE button go...
You said it was based on available facts. If the facts are handy, why not share them?
Oh, I forgot: you don't care if you're wrong. You just threw some stuff on the wall, and it's up to us to determine the truth or falsity of your opinion.
You said it was based on facts.
What facts?
I based my claim of your complete ignorance on this subject by the available facts, specifically your admission you just made it up.
What facts did you use to make up your definition of homelessness?
My God man. The fact of the wording. The fact of the way media hype works. The fact that people don't always have a residence address between addresses.
Did I ever claim the quality of facts?
You guys are pissing me off by reading way too much into what I said.
WH... I understand ChumpMonkey and O- wanting to piss me of, but et tu WH?
Wasn't my opinion simple enough? I shouldn't have to defend it outside of any evidence of the contrary, and then, I might change my opinion.
Maybe they know that, and want to still claim I never change my mind?
First hit when one googles "homeless definition."
What wording?
You could have saved yourself the trouble if you looked it up yourself.
You've already spent much more time responding to posters than that would have taken.
OK, 4CC came up with a HUD definition. Maybe I'll hear the newsflash again, and who the report was by. That still doesn't mean they used the HUD definition. The government has a clear definition of "subsidy" that I looked up before, but even government reports fail to use the word as defined.
I am, however, in belief that my initial assessment may be wrong.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)