Reply With Quote
I concur. 27 free throws in one quarter is bull .
I think you have the right just like Ghazi to argue that the Kings were the best team in 2002 and should have won the Championship....
I think the Kings-Lakers series officiating in 2002 is just as bad as the Heat-Mavericks officiating in 2006.
With all honesty here... 2006 Dallas Mavericks and 2002 Sacramento Kings are the Real Champions:
Turnabout is fair play!
Discuss...
Last edited by Dunc n Dave; 07-20-2009 at 02:43 AM.
I concur. 27 free throws in one quarter is bull .
Biggest robbery on NBA history.
If you need another proof that NBA refs favor the Lakers look at this:
Last edited by DAF86; 07-20-2009 at 03:22 AM.
lol
Please read this. I know it's long, but it would renew your faith in the NBA
http://www.82games.com/lakerskingsgame6.htm
I rewatched the entire series a few months ago, and from what I could tell it was pretty up and down the entire damn series in terms of officiating. Yeah, the Lakers got about 4 or 5 50/50 calls in the 4th quarter of game 6, but that's to be expected. If I was a Sacramento fan, I'd be mad about that quarter too. But the Lakers got jobbed a couple of times that series as well.
That "should have" malarkey is what led you to 4-1 Mavs a couple months back, Dunc.
27 free throws in 4th quarter is just too obvious...Kings should have won that game.
Wouldn't-a stopped the Mavs from bustin' yer ass 4-1. You had that comin', daddy-O.
im not a spurs player so that dosent bother me at all
Damn! Perhaps some collateral damage then: Everybody else that tanked for Duncan hang a right, take a look.im not a spurs player so that dosent bother me at all
Sacramento Kings 2002 NBA Champions .... respect for the true champs sons
Sweet Jesus, it's the Hornets:::second cousins to the Blazers & Bobcats= anytime they see the Lakers come to town they get up off their lazy asses and get their together, like pronto. Otherwise?...they're just check cashers.
Hey, BR, when the '10 schedule comes out run over to it, circle the dates the Lakers are comin' in and then go back to yer siesta. Savvy, youngster?
Nice try old timer...
Who's talking about the 2009 Mavs? This is 2002 we are talking about, you know the one where the league handed your Lakers a le, because it would "be in the best interest of the league to extend the series."
Watch the news report in the video posted. It's not just my opinion or some witty quote I found in a book...
Besides, this thread was started in response to one of your own Laker fans starting the "Suns 2007 Champions." Figure you guys shold be able to take it, if you're willing to dish it out...
I got no problem takin' it whatsoever. This "old timer" discovered decades ago that nobody gave two s when I stood by and watched the Celtics get "handed" a few "in the best interest of the league." So I figured, what the , what's good for the goose, is surely good for the gander.Nice try old timer...
Who's talking about the 2009 Mavs? This is 2002 we are talking about, you know the one where the league handed your Lakers a le, because it would "be in the best interest of the league to extend the series."
Watch the news report in the video posted. It's not just my opinion or some witty quote I found in a book...
Besides, this thread was started in response to one of your own Laker fans starting the "Suns 2007 Champions." Figure you guys shold be able to take it, if you're willing to dish it out...
Ipso facto, Dunc, I strive for only two goals: 1. make the playoffs. 2. win the last game I play. How I get there and by what means it's accomplished is of no concern to me in the slightest.
They would have won the le, but their coach wasn't without blame... and they should have made their free throws...
To this day, my throat is still sore from screening 'WHO'S ON HORRY?! WHO'S ON HORRY?! NOOOOOOOOO!!! WHY DID DIVAC PASS THE BALL TO HORRY?!'
This thread makes a hundred times more sense than the 2007 one.
CWEBB was on him. You know the last thing Adelman told him was "don't leave Horry, Chris." But, Webber was always a dumb , got bored out there on the arc and peeked inside, saw the commotion and started up that lane.
What, three years later Wallace made the same mistake, turned his back on Horry and Shaaaaaaaaaazaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmm!
ya go lakers!
Good for them
oh well..what do you expect? we da lakers!
!
That shot of Robert's vs. the Kings would have been forgotten in the NBA archives if the Kings had RIGHTFULLY won Game 6, like they were supposed to. Nobody cares about game winning shots if you lose the series. Lebron's game winner is meaningless since they lost the series to Orlando.
If Kings get a fair shake in Game 6 from the refs, Lakers lose the series that very night and Kings go on to win the Finals.
Eh, Kings had Game 7 on their home floor. The fact that they couldn't close out the series shows me they really didn't deserve to win that series.
David Stern agrees with you, hence the fix
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
