Reply With Quote
Too long...
I'm all for people with condescending tones and arrogant dispositions (sup me) but at least I pride myself on my ability to be consistent. You know I don't find that people like myself, or you for that matter, really earn the ear of an audience unless the audience understands that you're always what you say you are. Basically what I'm trying to say is that for you to be who you are we would expect that you stay in character.
I find it ironic or insulting or maybe just befuddling how you can get up on your little smart guy pedestal with your truther movement hat on and condescendingly preach the conspiracy of what really happened on 9/11. Only to turn around and support the belief of Jesus/God/8,000 year old universe/extremely anti-scientific theory with that same condescending tone and arrogant at ude.
So on one hand you have a full blown modern day conspiracy. Full blown American Government involvement (planning) of the destruction that took place on 9/11. Some interesting facts, videos (or lack thereof) and pseudo scientific analysis. Quite the argument on either side of the fence as to the legitimacy of what you're preaching. All in all the general consensus is that there is very little stone cold solid evidence. Lots of questions need/should be answered. No doubt the one thing you have here is that no matter what took place everyone agrees that it didn't go down exactly how they want us to think it did. The reasons for the semi-smokescreen are unknown but are likely in place to keep from having to answer for each and every post attack move.
Furthermore we have lots of interesting facts that may or may not lead further down the rabbit hole. However in the end its always a hard pill to swallow when you take into consideration that the worst President, maybe even one of the most self absorbed egotistical men to ever hold a power of higher authority has systematically taken part (maybe not lead the way) in one of the largest most massive most thorough cover ups in all of history. Potentially one the grandest schemes ever committed. The scope of the conspiracy is unimaginable...massive on the grandest scale. All in all the entire scope of this conspiracy leaves a lot to be desired before everyday man is willing to drink the Kool-Aid.
On the other hand you have a dying belief that there was in fact a man named Jesus and all powerful en y named God who created a universe in 6 days and watched it grow for the last 8 or so thousand years. That belief as a whole (because I'll give you the benefit) has dwindled in following over the last century, % of followers to population, maybe tenfold. At least in half. Even if you rounded up the small mass of followers less than a tenth of them have a reasonable historical grasp on what their worshiping. The blind leading the blind is the very thing you swear against in one place but are in full support in another. Despite the fact of a complete and utter lack of anything tangible or physical, you carry on. To expand this belief you've branched off of this into the scientific world and boldly put yourself in the even smaller market of religious conspiracy supporters who completely turn their eye to scientific fact and theory.
You're all about the facts. All about pimping the truth and exposing the blind eye to what really goes down behind closed doors. You have exponentially more facts. Real tangible solid proof and the support of the most diverse most intelligent group of people on the planet filling you in on the conspiracy of religious based thinking and all of its branches. Only to fall on deaf ears because you're too busy drinking the crazy sauce on one of the most outlandish, unfounded, unsupported down right unbelievable modern day conspiracies.
So to wrap this all up you're a guy who wants to expose the truth. The truth in one belief that ultimately has very little to stand on. Very little support through the higher intelligent community. You want us to buy this story in full because we're blind to whats really going on. Then you insult our intelligence about another worldly conspiracy that has facts, proven theories and a lack of tangible evidence on your side of the fence. We have the support of some of the greatest minds to ever exist. Somehow they don't know .
Just looking for a little consistency friend. God bless.
Too long...
By intelligent design. Just wanted to weed out the skimmers.
tl;dr
In both cases he's going against the popular scientific belief. I don't see any inconsistency.
I figured there would be someone who said this.
I don't agree and you're missing my point. A single commonality doesn't equate to consistency especially in this case. Think bigger picture and entire scope of what he preaches.
....and now that you've said this he'll probably lean on it pretty hard.
If I'm allowed to be an evolutional creationist, Mouse is allowed to be bi-polar.
In both cases you say he's siding with a wild conspiracy theory. Still pretty consistent to me.
In his eyes he's following the truth or what he believes to be reality under sheep's clothing. On one side he's in support of exposing the "truth". On the other side he's in support of silencing the "truth". A truth that has far more support and backing. He's about exposing one massive conspiracy but not another.
Nothing that mouse says is deserving of anything more than a one line response, at most.
It's almost like when a child says something stupid to you, a long drawn out response is entirely unnecessary.
wheres cliff notes yo....
i aint reading that
I'm doing my best here. WORK WITH ME HERE.
Your post makes little sense. So basically, you're saying that if you believe in a government conspiracy on 9/11, that it would be out of character to believe in God? How can you even connect the two? This is a FAAARRR, FAARRR, reach here. I could pose the same argument that Big Zak isn't being consistent because on one hand he loves buffalo wings, and then on the other, he believes in Jesus. This argument is as rediculous and baseless as yours. Congrats on TRYING to make yourself look convicted by writing alot of words!
I already explained this
He's about exposing one massive conspiracy but not another. Preaches how we're blind in one place because the facts are stacked against us but completely ignores the facts of another.
+1 Not even the same thing at all.
aahhh... if you believe it was a conspiracy.... Belief in one doesn't mandate belief in all...
That's what should have made this thread interesting. The point is that he's emphatically over the top on something out there like 9/11 but unwilling to acknowledge the grounded and widely accepted information about another conspiracy. Thus a lack of staying in character.
I'll spell it out. The fact that its a reach is what should drive this thread.
No surprise here fatass.
POW!
POW-Pow!
This is the same guy that will do essentially anything you ask him to do so long as you pay him in either beer or drugs, and already have the equipment to do said job (lawnmower for example).
This is also the same guy that diagnoses every PC problem as a virus.
Have you ever actually met this guy in person?
A thread about clarification from mouse!?!?Brahahahahaha!!!
I've been dealing with mouse for years and I still haven't figured out what accounting system he uses.
Mouse is good people though.He's just....well....mouse.
Never met him.
Yeah the day that mouse clarifies anything will be the day Baby Jesus comes down from the sky...A thread about clarification from mouse!?!?
I know what accounting system he uses, one twelve pack of beer equals two hours or work....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
