Reply With Quote
Moot point. Celtics lost. Mavs won, 4-1.
tee, hee.
WTF boston jus had garnett and perkings, two bigs crowd the GSW inbounder who couldnt see past them. That should be illegal imo. So whats next have three huge guys cordon off the inbounds passer? there really wasnt much room to throw over a couple of 7 footers either.
Moot point. Celtics lost. Mavs won, 4-1.
tee, hee.
i think you can have how many guys guarding the inbounder but need to give him room
This forum is amazing, haters want to make up rules to try to stop the Celtics. A few weeks ago there was some guy wondering why the referees werent' calling "illegal defence" on the Cs, now comes another with another made up rule.
Go read the rulebook, you know-nothing.
In any case, I agree, things would be more fair if the Cs were forced to play with a more stringent rule set.
Stings, don't it, Mo? Tougheth lucketh. Just show up Wednesday with some balls.
Savvy, asshole?
Why? That just opens up the paint when you inbound it.
I thought it was smart and it ALMOST worked ...
Celtics have a lot of illegal plays anyways; like Garnett death threat and Garnet illegal screens.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions