# Courage...
And I thought his DAUGHTERS were attention s....
who cares?
Freedom!
lol Conspiracy Cowboy is extra salty today
You're the one breathlessly staring threads about it and reposting the picture.
How do you know he's breathless?
Breathless?
Bruce took "Keeping up with the Kardashians" WAY too seriously.
Enjoy your wanking, Chump.
You rubbed yourself raw dude. Keep reposting tranny pics since that's what you're into. I'm not here to judge your life choices.
Chump, your penis/success envy is showing.
You can still try to compensate by attempting to win the internet every day. You and Boutons make a cute couple.
Who said anything about penises?
Oh, you.
And success? Where is all this coming from, dude? Just own your inconsistent conspiracy mongering. It's not a crime.
It's OK man, I said I'm not judging. Don't get so defensive.You can still try to compensate by attempting to win the internet every day. You and Boutons make a cute couple.
Sheesh, that's some genuine bitterness CC.
Ok, gotta admit, this is strike.
And you'll never guess... it's a Republican of course
Fox Hosts: Caitlyn Jenner's Real Bravery Is In Being A Conservative
Fox News hosts Andrea Tantaros and Eric Bolling said Monday that Caitlyn Jenner's real bravery rested in her declaration of being a Republican instead of her gender transition.
They made the comments during a panel on "The Five" discussing the reality TV star's public debut as a woman on the cover of Vanity Fair's June issue.
"I think she looks great," co-host Julie Roginsky said of the cover. "For the record, I think she looks fantastic and I'm happy for her that she's finally at peace with herself."
Tantaros then interjected with a reference to Jenner's pre-transition interview with ABC News' Diane Sawyer, in which she said her politics were "kind of more on the conservative side."
"I think it was more courageous to come out as a conservative than to come out as Caitlyn, I mean truthfully," Tantaros said. "I also think that she looks better now and I really mean that. Probably because she's happy … and visually, and I'm being totally honest because I really love this look and I support -- he looks better as a she."
"I wasn't smirking about anything that was going on here. I was smirking because I had the exact same talking points," Bolling later added. "Bruce Jenner did something that was very difficult. Bruce Jenner did something that he knew was probably going to give him a lot of grief. Bruce Jenner stood up and loudly and proudly declared that he was a Republican."
Tantaros' and Bollings' awkward approaches to Jenner's transition followed a mocking segment about the reality TV star on Fox Business Network's "Cavuto." Host Neil Cavuto had wondered "what the is going on?" with Jenner before comparing gender transitions to the fall of Roman civilization.
They weren't the only ones to draw attention to Jenner's conservative views, though. Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), known for his colorful Twitter personality, wondered on Twitter whether Caitlyn was a still a Republican post-transition:Bruce #Jenner came out as a Republican last April.Well is #CaitlynJenner a Republican too ?
— Steve Cohen (@RepCohen) June 1, 2015
Mike Huckabee: I wish I could've said I'm transgender in high school to shower with girls
http://www.vox.com/2015/6/2/8711051/...gender-showers
smhlol Christian logic
Come on Blake...That is a mighty broad brush...Huckabee is outspoken & (at times) creepy...That does not make his agenda Christian...I can't stand TV Evangelist & TBN any more than you...
Pure and undefiled religion in the sight of our God and Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself unstained by the world.
James 1:27
Basically it means to care for those who have no means to pay you back...That is the mark of a Christian...
He's an ordained southern baptist minister that's running for office. I think the evangelical pandering is crystal clear imo.
Jon Stewart rips media for immediately discussing Caitlyn Jenner’s ‘comparative f*ckability’
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/06/jon-...e+Raw+Story%29
So you think a person can govern without using their own code of morality and ethics?
when the law isn't clear, they yes personal biases, like religious , hate, comes into play.
Where is the law not clear?
Of course, one can always govern in defiance of the law like Obama and his executive orders.
pay attention, there's lots of bad and/or vague laws at all levels. When vague, the judge's personal interpretation, like Bible humpers making up from the Bible, comes into play. How about that judge up north in a red state that gave a 30 days sentence for rape? etc, etc, etc.
Now look at how the SCOTUS5 will judge the ACA "no subsidy for Federal exchange users" case this month, where ACA was badly written. They will probably ignore the INTENT of the law, and say "we, in this case almost uniquely becasue we 5 assholes want to Obama, are bound by the literal text of the law"
Boo, if you want judges to rule on what they think the intent was instead of ruling on what the law actually says that is a slippery ass slope.
Don't call him Bruce you assholes, that is now hate speech.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/02/ac...#ixzz3c0fB4E4U
yep, rightwingnut bull .
You need to learn more about the law.
Judges, before the SCOTUS5, had to navigate bad, vague laws to judge what the totality of the law INTENDED. GFY
If the SCOTUS5 say they ABSOLUTELY MUST follow an ANOMALOUS sentence to 2000 pages, it will be yet more proof that You People have really ed up American law with your Repug assholles tainting the judicial with extreme rightwingnut judges.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)