nope
Throw the line somewhere else on Lake Spurstalk.
This fish ain't biting.
![]()
Which one of you Laker gots is going to man up and accept a sig bet for this game? Spurs without Longoria, Lakers without Crynum.
nope
Throw the line somewhere else on Lake Spurstalk.
This fish ain't biting.
![]()
spurs gonna get raped like that white chick from Colorado
The Spurs will win tomorrow because Kobe is playing
So who will you be rooting for?
because accepting a sig bet from a troll with 800 posts makes sense
cmon laker gots! man up against him
Sig bet on a RS game? How about a playoff series?![]()
According to most Laker fans on here the Spurs blow and the Lakers are poised to repeat...yet no takers![]()
oh my fault for not being an original spurstalker, sir
gotta love the old timers' self-righteousness
a match up between these two teams in the postseason isnt guaranteed bro
Not the Lakers fault the Spurs won't go far enough to meet them
I'd take the Nets any day over the Spurs and Lakers combined.
No Longoria, Spurs don't stand a chance.
If you seriously want to take a sig bet on this game, I'll take it but I'm thinking about your own good here.
And Machine has an open bet here too:
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149339
I know LA is without Bynum but didn't they beat the Spurs in San Antonio last year without him?
No, because Derek Fisher is a screw-up.
Kardasian has a bad shoulder too
lakers raped spurs without Bynum and Bryant, this year
Im guessing you havent seen much of George Hill, Spurs definitely have a chance.
Use the sig of the other person's choice until the next SAS-LAL game sound good?
George Hill is good, but he's not THAT good
Sounds good to me. I accept the bet if you and Machine can't work it out.
You should check the Spurs forum out, they think Hill >>>> Parker and that we should trade Tony for Dwight Howard or something.
He's not even good, I'm surprised Pops is giving him minutes, is he supposed to be the future for the Spurs? I really hope not
George Hill has probably been the most consistant Spur other than Tim Duncan this entire season. I dont know his exact stats but I know he's been averaging 15+ ppg and a couple of boards and assists since being inserted into the starting line-up. He isnt as explosive as Tony obviously but he brings much better defense and a much better jump shot, and players like Jefferson are actually doing decent with him running the point. Now Im not saying the Spurs are better without Tony or anything. But I am in the small boat of Spur fans that would trade Tony if it meant getting a star big man in return. The frontcourt help+Hill filling in respectively at the point would more than outweight losing Tony.
Canadians, the game is on TheScore
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)