Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 40
  1. #1
    "He's Manu Ginobili." senorglory's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    927
    Henry Abbot of ESPNs True Hoop, trashes Duncan, naming him as one this year's playoff disappointments. Calls Duncan a "defensive liability."

    Roundtable: Most Disappointing Players

    ***

    3. Tim Duncan, San Antonio
    The Phoenix Suns don't have an Achilles' heel. They have an Achilles' half-acre.

    With Robin Lopez out, it's fair to ask if there has ever been a playoff team so unprepared to stop a quality big man in the paint. The Suns are terrible when Jarron Collins is on the floor, and Channing Frye and Amare Stoudemire play mainly for their offense. So with one of the most favorable matchups any NBA star has faced in the playoffs, Duncan should have been dominating.

    Instead he was merely solid on offense, and a liability on defense. (Compare Duncan's offense to, say, the Hawks' Al Horford, who is playing against the defensive player of the year, and one of the NBA's best defenses. Horford has a much better true shooting percentage and a better rebound rate to go with lower usage and turnover rates.)

    In Duncan's 12th postseason, he slipped badly. Steve Nash made layup after layup, and the vast majority of the time -- because of injury, age or something -- Duncan didn't even have the wherewithal to jump, let alone block the shot. Although Duncan did manage to briefly slow Nash with an inadvertent elbow to the eye in Game 4, Duncan's defensive shortcomings proved a key factor in one of the NBA's best teams bowing out in a second-round sweep instead of vying for a le.


    Henry Abbot can suck my balls.

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    2,592
    Quite frankly, he's somewhat right.

    Defensively, we were abused on the pick-and-roll because Tim was unable to help contain Nash and get back to his man, even over fairly short distances. He didn't jump to challenge shots, and often reached when in earlier years he would have been able to slide in front of someone. Also, the Suns got a lot of 3's because of the Spurs defenders having to drop down to help in the paint and not being able to get back, which is something the Spurs haven't had to do in previous matchups against the Suns.

    Obviously having Bonner, Mason, and Blair (was pretty bad except for when he was fronting Stoudamire), didn't help, but for much of the time he was out there, Duncan was a weak point in the defense. That's only because of his lack of mobility and the capability of the Suns big men to really pull him out of the lane by hitting 15+ ' jumpers.

    Offensively, there's no arguing that Duncan didn't have one of the worst postseasons we've seen from him after game three in Dallas. The sudden dropoff leads one to believe that his knee was acting up after that game and never quite got right again. He was missing shots he'd normally make, and his free throw shooting was abyssmal.

    However, the main reason the Spurs lost is still the fact that there were only 7 people Pop trusted, and one of them was Bonner...

  3. #3
    "He's Manu Ginobili." senorglory's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    927
    A few days earlier, ESPN slammed Duncan with the headline, Has Duncan Become A Defensive Liabillity?. Despite the damning headline, the article itself failed to make a case against Duncan, ultimately concluding that Duncan was now an "average" defender:

    In his prime, few big men mul asked pick-and-roll defense the way Duncan could. He had both the intuition, reaction and agility to harass the craftiest ball-handlers, while simultaneously checking the screener. Duncan almost always seemed to guess right -- but it wasn't guesswork at all. Duncan's instincts guided his movement on the defensive end of the floor.

    ***

    Even at his most exposed, he's no worse than average for an NBA big man on the pick-and-roll.


    There is no substance to this allegation. Hopefully it will not gain traction through repe ion.

  4. #4
    Ballin' is a habit... TIMMYD!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    6,170
    Yes, Tim is becoming slower and all but it doesn't mean he isn't a better defensive player than 90% of C's in the league.

  5. #5
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,321
    That's not entirely fair...yes, he has slipped, but the Spurs' defensive scheme always called for a solid perimeter stopper/impeder and a 2nd big to protect the rim from the weakside...it was never a one-man defense scheme...and given that the team no longer has a perimeter stopper/impeder and a 2nd big, Duncan's inability to compensate for everyone else seems worse than it actually is...

    It was a team weakness...this was not a good defensive team...

  6. #6
    Respect all, Fear none. Refocus's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Post Count
    1,141
    Every player on the team was a defensive liability.. we got killed with constant bad defensive rotations. :|

  7. #7
    Race for seis crc21209's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    16,204
    Yes, Tim is becoming slower and all but it doesn't mean he isn't a better defensive player than 90% of C's in the league.
    +1. Add the fact that Pop for some reason went with Bonner the majority of this series instead of Dice who at least is waaay better defensively and could've helped TD in the post...

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    1,636
    Duncan has slowed. He is no longer a defensive anchor.

    But add a perimeter defender who can hit the corner three, and pair Duncan with another decent-to-good interior defender . . . Duncan would thrive on both ends. His window hasn't yet closed.

  9. #9
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    65
    Henry Abbot of ESPNs True Hoop, trashes Duncan, naming him as one this year's playoff disappointments. Calls Duncan a "defensive liability."

    Roundtable: Most Disappointing Players

    ***

    3. Tim Duncan, San Antonio
    The Phoenix Suns don't have an Achilles' heel. They have an Achilles' half-acre.

    With Robin Lopez out, it's fair to ask if there has ever been a playoff team so unprepared to stop a quality big man in the paint. The Suns are terrible when Jarron Collins is on the floor, and Channing Frye and Amare Stoudemire play mainly for their offense. So with one of the most favorable matchups any NBA star has faced in the playoffs, Duncan should have been dominating.

    Instead he was merely solid on offense, and a liability on defense. (Compare Duncan's offense to, say, the Hawks' Al Horford, who is playing against the defensive player of the year, and one of the NBA's best defenses. Horford has a much better true shooting percentage and a better rebound rate to go with lower usage and turnover rates.)

    In Duncan's 12th postseason, he slipped badly. Steve Nash made layup after layup, and the vast majority of the time -- because of injury, age or something -- Duncan didn't even have the wherewithal to jump, let alone block the shot. Although Duncan did manage to briefly slow Nash with an inadvertent elbow to the eye in Game 4, Duncan's defensive shortcomings proved a key factor in one of the NBA's best teams bowing out in a second-round sweep instead of vying for a le.


    Henry Abbot can suck my balls.

    I agree w/ Mr. Abbot.

  10. #10
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    The Mavs series was a drain on Manu and Tim -- and it showed against the Suns. Those guys aren't getting any younger.

    Nash is a couple of years older than Timmy, which makes what he did that much more impressive.

  11. #11
    NostraSpurMus phxspurfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    14,364
    Yeah, he's kinda right. Watching this series, it looked an awful lot like the Warriors' dismantling of the Mavs in 07. The Warriors had more energy, a better home crowd, way better shooting but no inside game whatsoever. This Suns team is better than teh Warriors, with both far more experience and talent, but we should have been mroe like the Jazz and pounded them in the paint. The Jazz in '07 absolutely demolished the Warriors, and it was because they recognized the smaller team's chasm in the middle and went after that weakness from the start.

    The Spurs, of course, didn't have the depth in the C/F positions like the Jazz always do, but Duncan could and should have beasted in every game of this series. In fact he needed to drop 30+ with close to 20 boards a game for us to win, and he should have. No excuses when you chill for an entire year, playing 3/4 of the usual star's minutes (30mpg season, ~40mpg playoffs).

    And yes, I know he's old.

  12. #12
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Someone should count Duncan's blocks in this series. I'd bet they went up. Duncan can't play defense by himself, and all he can do when the game plan says to switch is to switch.

    And Al Horford is a joke. Anyone who says he compares favorably has missed him giving up 80 layups a game to Orlando while they lose by 30 every night.

  13. #13
    Pump Bacon Cane's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    3,687
    Abbot was on the Bill Simmons podcast today and they talked about this as well.

    Duncan did have a disappointing playoffs and his weaknesses were exposed. Still can't believe how bad he shot from the free throw line either.

  14. #14
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Duncan has been unfairly trashed this entire series..Tim averaged 2.8 blocks in the series TO ADD to 1 steal per game, which is a very high number for a 34-year old with so many responsibilities on both ends of the floor..

    He also defended Stoudemire a lot better than most people have in the past few months..

    Duncan is now an average or below average pick and roll defender, which was obviously expected..expecting him to defend the p&r AND defend Stoudemire AND anchor the defense is a ridiculous expectation..

    The Spurs FO has done a terrible job at getting Tim some help in the frontcourt..don't get me wrong, McDyess had a good playoffs, but he's not the answer..the Spurs need a mobile big man that can play D next to Tim, hopefully Splitter is that guy..

    It also doesn't help that the Spurs don't have any competent defenders on the wing..Tony and Manu played good D in the playoffs, but you obviously can't expect them to be consistent while playing a huge role offensively..

  15. #15
    Silence surpasses speech. duncan228's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    27,693
    Someone should count Duncan's blocks in this series. I'd bet they went up.
    Blocks in the Dallas series: 6

    Suns series: 11

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Duncan's playoff averages were 19 PPG, 10 RPG, 1.7 BPG, 2.6 APG on 52% shooting..I really don't think anybody should have expected any more from him, it's unrealistic..

    The only thing that disappointed me about Duncan was his horrible FT shooting..no excuses for that..

    BTW, Abbott had Dirk as his #1 disappointment, which is ridiculous..

  17. #17
    Emperor Duncan>>>>>King James tim_duncan_fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    3,964
    Duncan could have made up for sucking on defense (and he did suck) by being aggressive offensively. But would he attack? NO! Would he demand the ball when his guards were taking bad threes and couldn't get in the lane or couldn't finish? No he would not!

    Duncan played like a passive weenie and his team followed suit. So, we are where we are. We'll try to implement Mahinmi next season and hopefully get a young wing who can stroke it a little bit as but as far as this past series...Duncan and his guys just didn't want it bad enough.

  18. #18
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    2,031
    The Mavs series was a drain on Manu and Tim -- and it showed against the Suns. Those guys aren't getting any younger.

    Nash is a couple of years older than Timmy, which makes what he did that much more impressive.
    Duncan has way more miles on his legs than Nash

  19. #19
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Asking Duncan to defend the p&r time and time again gives the illusion that Duncan was bad on defense..that's not on Duncan, that's on the FO for doing a poor job at getting a mobile big, and it's on Pop for being unable to figure out a strategy against it(even though it would be difficult)..

    Expecting a 34-year old C with tons of mileage to be a good p&r defender is absolutely ridiculous..

    As for Nash..he doesn't have nearly as much mileage, he's only played 1 side of the floor his entire career and he's thrived in an era with relatively low physical contact against perimeter players..not hating on Nash, but it's completely different..

  20. #20
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    As for Nash..he doesn't have nearly as much mileage, he's only played 1 side of the floor his entire career and he's thrived in an era with relatively low physical contact against perimeter players..not hating on Nash, but it's completely different..
    Running around with 175 pounds weighing on the legs for 14 years is a lot less detrimental than 260 pounds on the hardwood for 13 years. That is the main reason why agility and quickness goes away a lot sooner for big men opposed to guards. IMO

  21. #21
    In Manu we STILL trust! rayray2k8's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    5,635
    Tim isn't getting younger guys. There are so many miles on him that it's not even funny. Duncan next year will be a starter but he'll be a role player. If the spurs keep his minutes down, Duncan will be able to help contribute in the coming years depending on how long his knee's can hold out.

  22. #22
    The Great Eight Ocotillo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,029
    Remember how the national media types used to trash David Robinson, calling him soft or the little mermaid? They have been waiting for the day Duncan loses a step so start looking for the same treatment going forward.

    that is unless they can somehow grab another

  23. #23
    @Kap10Jack Blackjack's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    8,262
    Harlem summed it up pretty well but it's really not all that hard and it's not worth taking the time to right some dissertation on the subject.

    Tim was asked to guard point-guards and perimeter players on an island after the switch. No he couldn't guard that well. How many 6-11 players, regardless of age, can do anything more than force a jump shot? That's literally just about the best you can do in that situation -- get out too far they blow by for a layup ... sag off you concede the jumper. You take the jumper every time.

    Judging Tim's ability to guard players on the perimeter -- on a island -- would be like judging a perimeter defender on his performance playing behind a post player in the paint. It's ridiculous.

    And I heard people ing in the game blog about Tim not contesting some layups by Nash . . . Well, if he rotates, he's getting dunked on and he's possibly picking up a foul. The guy's in a lose-lose situation and these people are going to kill him whatever the outcome. Like I said ... it's ridiculous.

    Tim did just about all you could ask from him defensively under the cir stance, yet I see this type of garbage posted by fans and, even worse, by people that are paid to actually know what they're talking about.

    It's common sense; having it seems anything but common . . .

  24. #24
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,510
    I Hope that next year bigs are : Duncan - Splitter
    Blair - Mahinmi
    Bonner - Dice
    Plenty of time to : rest Duncan/Dice
    See if Splitter is the answer
    Develop Blair and Mahinmi

    Bonner like an insurance big that knows the system and plays in when ther's the absolute need to stretch the floor can still be a good option...maybe also in play off time (see last two games).

  25. #25
    Manure Ginobili Mixability's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    7,749
    that late 4th quarter layup by a one eyed Nash was pretty disgusting to see, since Duncan was practically frozen under the basket.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •