Do I have to say it?
Heat Is on Perez Hilton for Miley Cyrus Photo
By Tim Nudd
Blogger Perez Hilton is facing widespread outrage, and possibly legal trouble, for posting an apparently explicit paparazzi shot of Miley Cyrus taken when the pop star was climbing out of a car.
Hilton, 32, whose real name is Mario Lavandeira Jr., posted the offending photo on Monday. He has since removed it. But since it exposed Cyrus, 17 – a minor – he could potentially face child-pornography charges.
http://www.people.com/people/article...394174,00.html
---------------------------------------------------------------
ha. Good riddance
Do I have to say it?
nothing will happen to perez.
countdown to Miley going full Lindsey in 10.....9.....
Yes, say it.
This guy is an idiot. I can't stand him.
lol asshole
I cant stand him either.
finally that crybaby drama-queen is getting some type of heat his way... i hate that fool!
Oh brother ....
![]()
Maybe she should have been wearing underwear and this wouldn't have happened.
You still can't distribute pics of a 17 year olds vag. I'd say send him to prison, but he'd like that, so I say send him to alabama
was this the guy that got into a girl fight with the from Black eyed Peas?
Yup. Called the guy from Black Eyed Peas a got.![]()
Oh.. he definitely shouldn't have posted the picture. I am just saying that she could easily avoid trouble by wearing underwear. In the rest of the series of pics she has white underwear on, so I don't know why she wasn't wearing them while getting out of the car.
banging somebody most likely, dem disney es are skanks
in training?![]()
Maybe it was that time of the month, and she needed to get some new ones.![]()
To quote Britney, Miley "is not that innocent."![]()
*word*
![]()
woman?
What about the dude that actually took the picture? Are they going to look for him? If Perez can be charged, then the paparazzi should be charged as well.
Exactly. Also distributing.
Well, I read on another site that the girl is not actually without underwear but that the photo was doctored to give the appearance of her not having underwear. Supposedly they can still charge him because his intent was to show a minor without underwear.
I don't know how true the claim is, or how the law works in this case.
seriously though, if taking down this leach ends up being miley cyrus's only positive contribution to society than its a successful life
Does anyone have the pic? 17 is legal in Texas.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)