Reply With Quote
A+
I don't really follow college ball, so past the first 6 or 7 picks, i'm lost. how'd the spurs do? james anderson on paper looks really good. and i def don't know anything about ryan richards
A+
A
We drafted a domestic player that will make our roster, got great value for the pick, and potentially filled a need. Then we grabbed the Toros' main attraction for the next two years. Works for me.
B
Does Richards have to meet Mahinmi in person to claim the Toros' Main Attraction plaque?
I'm certainly not going to criticize the pick. Anderson is a fine, young player, decent scorer and a good shooter. He should fit the bill as primary backup for Manu. I was just hoping for a player with more length and athleticism.
I guess this spells the end of the line for either Hairston, Gee or both. Mason? Please!
Id give the Spurs a B+, but then again I don't know much about college shooters, I just know Anderson is a good shooter which we need.
Come on, we got a Big 12 Player of the Year. Before him were Blake Griffin and Kevin Durant. Anderson is a polished offensive player, a good shooter, which was what the Spurs needed.
and DX gave him a 9/10 on defense......
You really can't rate a draft until about three years later, but I'll give the spurs a B. You really can't have an A+ draft as a spurs fan because Robinson and Duncan set the bar very high but we'll see if this can turn into an A if Ryan Richard becomes something. James Anderson is a given. He will be able to score just teach him to play some D.
Anderson - A
Richards - B+
Overall: A-
I definitely think that a lot of intriguing players slipped and the Spurs should have been more aggressive in pursuing purchasing a mid-second rounder. Still, I can't argue with what they got where they drafted. Anderson fills an immediate need and Richards is a very intriguing big in a draft filled with project bigs. Plus hes young as and probably comes packaged with a damn cool accent. I'm not complaining at all.
A++++++++++++++++
There's really not enough +'s i can put because the Spurs are the best franchise in sports history, while the Mavs suck
A
Now THAT's a quality post! (No blue type necessary)
A-
Anderson's a solid pickup. I had a hunch it would be either him or Craig Brackins.
B+
B-
A+, that's what we need..A good shooter that doesn't have a name Roger Mason Jr.
A for sure if you look at what picks we had and what was available.
Did anyone think, for a moment, when the Pacers drafted Paul George that perhaps, they had some pre-arranged trade to ship him to the Spurs, in exchange for George Hill?
It crossed my mind for a second or two.
Last edited by SenorSpur; 06-25-2010 at 03:23 AM.
No, but I did roll my eyes when I saw that no trade had been conducted. The pre-draft waters were incredibly murky this year.
i did....coz pacers already had granger....
That's one good reason. With Granger on the team, where will George play? Unless, of course, he plays shooting guard.
The reason I thought a possible trade was in the works was because the Pacers were so adamant and public about their desire to get rid of their #10 pick, in exchange for a PG. I was surprised they didn't find a suitable deal.
that missled me to think, that he culd be a lockdown type of guy.
how would you rank his defense?
if ne is a poor defender, I'd give us a B-, if he is solid its a B+ and if he is really good (I think, he isn't), it becomes an A
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
