Reply With Quote
brake?
Thoughts?
Last edited by FalleNxWiZarDx; 06-29-2010 at 11:32 AM. Reason: Typo
brake?
So he's not going to get any better??
fixed :p
last year he got votes for MIP. That WAS his breakout year.
This year we will see some steady but moderate improvement most likely.
There is too much firepower on our team for hill to get much more "breakout."
The only way I can think of that he could improve greatly would be if he jumped some levels as a defender.
If he is in Rockets he would have a breakout year. But in Spurs? You better hope he didn't lose confidence.
He needs to improve to position and become a better point guard. Needs to work on his lateral quickness, nothing one of their trainers couldn't fix
should be the starting point guard. Trade parker
I agree, its not even like Parker is a pass first point guard.
I know Hill is a SG, by nature. Last summer, he worked tirelessly on his jump shot and it paid off handsomely. He already knows how to score himself. That's no problem.
Now, he needs to take the next step. He could surely help himself and the team if he learned how to run the point. He needs to learn how to run an offense (especially the pick-n-roll), learn how to drive and kick, feed the post and setup other guys to score.
He could also stand to improve his ability to defend. He's not bad, but he's not the stopper that he originally appeared to be.
All you guys wishing for hill to become the point are dreaming; Hill is a combo guard at best. He will be a serviceable backup and a dangerous shooter for us. Hopefully he becomes more and more a defensive force as well. But a pass-first pg he never will be.
And stop the Parker hate.
PGs are born not made. You don't play the sg position and then become a starting pg in the nba. This does not happen.
Even if Hill learns the basic skills required to be a competent and regular player at the point, he will never be good. This is just not his strength.
Parker is shoot first, but he also has improved his assist numbers over his career.
Further, our offense has never been assist-friendly; it is usually the 2nd pass that creates points, or it came from kick-outs from the post.
Hill is good and should be an important part of our team. But trying to force him to be something he is not (a true pg) will make him a worse player, not better.
If Hill has a breakout year compared to last year you're talking about him turning into an all-star. Is that what you're suggesting?
I think we'll see a huge upgrade on his defense.
All great points.
However, just because he's not a true PG, and I agree he probably will never be, doesn't excuse the fact that he needs to improve his ability to play that position. Hill is not going to exclusively limited to the SG position. Therefore, since he will be playing some point, in a pinch, he needs to up his PG playmaking quotient. In order for other players, particularly Anderson, to be successful, Hill must assume more playmaking duties. After all, Manu cannot continue to be depended upon for the bulk of the playmaking duties for this team.
If Hill can upgrade his offensive game, in the areas I mentioned, he wil become a more well-rounded player and the team, as a whole, will benefit.
i think he'll improve - no doubt. but not a breakout type year. this past year was definitely his "breakout" year.
Agreed. I think it makes the spurs better if Hill can adequately be our backup pg.
and for the record, your comments were not included within the "parker haters" category mentioned above.
However, although I share your assumption that manu should not have to shoulder the ball-handling when parker is off the floor, I wonder if that is a mistake.
why can't Manu and Parker be our primary ball handlers? Manu might be the better of the two in that regard. When manu is on the floor, the pg would basically just bring the ball up the floor and let manu create. Manu is the half-court pg in that situation.
backup pg?
Temple is great and all, but he is not a 2nd pg. He has to prove a LOT before we go there.
I see Hill's role diminishing IF anderson is as good as advertised and manu and parker are healthy all season and play well.
RJ and Parker will probably score more than last year, that would be great.
But Hill can still be very important as a backup 1-2 for defense and 3pt shooting.
I don't see enough depth at the 1 to trade hill.
And what would we trade him for? A defensive sf who can shoot 3's? That is our need, but hill seems worth more to me than that...
I must agree, though, that I think Hill is a specialty piece, and unless he adapts to the pg position, has limited usefulness as a combo guard.
AND, all this is true even if Manu is the primary ball handler when parker is resting. We still need a guy on the floor who can guard the pg's.
I agree I think Hill is great for insurance at the 1 and 2 spot but to be honest I think he is a tweener who will be a good sixth man. If all the reports are true them Anderson is going to be the man at the SG position so Hill will have his time split between playing the 1 and 2.
I wouldn't trade him for the fact that I don't think we will be able to re sign Parker and I don't know if we could get a decent PG in what ever trade goes down.
In fact I think we need to upgrade our D league pg I think we could sign someone better then Jerrells to our team..Matt Bouldin or Mikhail Torrance would be nice upgrade.
I hope his D gets better, that should be his number 1 goal
kinda what i was thinking. i don't think there's any room on this team for him to get much better. he's an awesome option though if tp gets hurt. remember the vaughan days?
Unless Anderson comes in, impresses and earns a starting spot at the 2, he'll likely be the first SG off the bench. From there, I will assume that Pop will use Parker and Manu as starters. This means, Anderson will likely spend a lot of time on the court with Hill. We also saw how Blair's offense suffered when he wasn't paired up with a playmaker, like Manu.
With Anderson on the roster, Hill's minutes at the 2 spot will likely decrease. All of this emphasizes how important it is that Hill become a more effective playmaker so that Anderson, and others, aren't standing around watching him.
No.
Hill isnt a PG. He's a midget SG. He averaged 0.001 apg in the playoffs. His defense is overrated, easily the most overrated defender in the NBA. He's not a pass-first PG. Parker is a Finals MVP and three-time all-star he should start not Hill. Hill's ceiling for next yr and his career is being a strong candidate for sixth-man of the year.
So, best case scenario is that hill improves his playmaking, allowing him to play with the second unit of blair and anderson.
If Hill does not accomplish that transition, and manu is called upon to handle the ball whenever parker is not in (again), then what?
How does that effect Hill's actual utility for the team? Well, he is still useful for guarding the opposing pg, and he is still a very good 3pt shooter.
But, that means that anderson is probably starting. that could be fine.
Or, anderson could pick up minutes with the second unit at the 3.
I guess I am turning over in my head what happens if Hill is what he is as far as pg skills go, and then wonder if his utility to the team changes depending on the role of Anderson as it develops over the year.
I don't think it becomes a big issue this year in any event; pop is unlikely to use Anderson SO much that hill gets less than 20mpg no matter what.
expecting alot of improvements from his game
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
