Reply With Quote
We should have more of these wetlands.
From hardcore, rightwing rag, the Associated Press:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100811/..._healing_marsh
BARATARIA BAY, La. – Shoots of marsh grass and bushes of mangrove trees already are starting to grow back in the bay where just months ago photographers shot startling images of dying pelicans coated in oil from the massive Gulf oil spill.
More than a dozen scientists interviewed by The Associated Press say the marsh here and across the Louisiana coast is healing itself, giving them hope delicate wetlands might weather the worst offshore spill in U.S. history better than they had feared. Some marshland could be lost, but the amount appears to be small compared with what the coast loses every year through human development.
On Tuesday, a cruise through the Barataria Bay marsh revealed thin shoots growing up out of the oiled mass of grass. Elsewhere, there were still gray, dead mangrove shrubs, likely killed by the oil, but even there new green growth was coming up.
"These are areas that were black with oil," said Matt Boasso, a temporary worker with the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.
As crude from a blown-out BP well oozed toward the marshes after an April oil-rig explosion, experts had feared it would kill roots in marsh grass, smother the mangroves and ultimately dissolve wetlands that plant life was holding together. State, federal and BP cleanup efforts were focused on preventing that from happening by burning and skimming the oil, blocking it with booms and sand berms and breaking it up with chemical dispersants.
Whether it is a triumph of cleanup work, the marshes' resiliency or both, scientists have reported regrowth of grasses, black mangrove trees and roseau cane, a lush, tall cane found in the brackish waters around the mouth of the Mississippi River.
"The marsh is coming back, sprigs are popping up," said Alexander S. Kolker, a marsh expert and coastal geologist in Cocodrie, La., with the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium.
He's working with a National Science Foundation team looking at the effect of the BP oil spill on Louisiana's vast but severely stressed marshland — also known as the Cajun prairie — where trappers, shrimpers and alligator hunters have made their living for generations. Louisiana, the state worst hit by the oil spill, is home to the vast majority of the northern Gulf's marshland.
Coastal Louisiana is covered in a thick mat of salt marshes that thrive on the edge of the Gulf of Mexico, where land merges with the sea. The marshes provide life support for fauna and flora in the Gulf, said Bob Thomas, a zoologist at Loyola University, and up to 90 percent of commercial fisheries depend on them for some stage of fish development.
Young bull sharks, for example, make a beeline for Louisiana's estuary to feed on catfish, bait fish and crabs, bulking up before returning offshore to pursue bigger meals, he said.
Many other Gulf species do the same thing. Blue crabs, menhaden and shrimp all come into the marsh to feed on the nutrient rich waters of the bays and marshes, where peaceful grazing is easier. Many freshwater bird species also come down to the marsh to feed, mature and nest.
Even before the spill, south Louisiana had been losing about 25 square miles of marshland a year, a total of about 2,300 square miles since the 1930s, mostly due to levee construction, logging, shipping and oil drilling. Only about 5,300 square miles of marsh and swamp remain in the state.
Louisiana accounts for about 30 percent of the nation's coastal marsh and about 90 percent of its marsh loss, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
Associated Press calculations based on how much coastline government scientists say was affected by the oil spill indicate that at most 3.4 square miles of Louisiana marshland was oiled, an area stretched out over hundreds of miles of coastline. At least some of those areas appear to have begun to bounce back.
Ivor van Heerden, a BP-hired environmental scientist, said the damage may be even less than that. He said federal, state and BP oil spill survey teams have found only 550 acres of marsh that have been oiled, less than 1 square mile.
"In all sectors the plants have continued to grow, even in the very worst areas," he said.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration concurred with van Heerden's figure but said it and other federal agencies are still calculating just how much marsh was oiled and what the effect has been, said agency spokesman Ben Sherman.
Marshland closest to the Gulf took the worst of the spill, absorbing oil and keeping it from oozing farther inland. Even losing a little of it would be a blow to the ecosystem.
Michael Blum, a Louisiana State University biologist who toured the marsh of Barataria Bay on Tuesday, said some of the grass won't stick around much longer.
"You're seeing exposed roots," he said. "The expectation is that you will have loss of the protective sheet, you have marsh that anchors the marsh in place, and if they die off they no longer have that anchor."
He added: "There's the possibility that land loss will be accelerated, or there will be a pulse of land loss associated with the BP oil spill. The question is how much and where."
Many other questions remain about how much environmental damage the spill inflicted. Scientists want to understand the effects of the chemical dispersants BP used to break up the oil and look more closely at how the smallest forms of life, things like fiddler crabs and spiders, have been affected.
"This is sort of the initial macroscopic view," said Tom Bianchi, an oceanographer and marsh expert at Texas A&M University working with the National Science Foundation team.
He said water from the oiled marsh showed problems. "We did see some particulates, silts and clays coming out of the marsh, clogging our filters," Bianchi said. That, he added, was a sign of marsh death, which could weaken the soil and lead to erosion.
The dominant plant species in coastal Louisiana is the spartina, better known as smooth cordgrass or salt-marsh cordgrass. Found from New England to Texas, it can take a beating, which is giving scientists reason to hope.
"It is used to living in severe environments, salt water and soils that are completely flooded, and that combination would kill almost any other plant," said Steven C. Pennings, a University of Houston ecologist studying the oil's effect on Louisiana's landscape.
Irving A. Mendelssohn, a coastal plant ecologist at Louisiana State University, said the wetlands data so far is good news for fishermen who depend on the ecosystem to produce shrimp, menhaden and other seafood.
"My gut feeling, based on what I have seen, based on the recovery people have observed, I doubt that the impact to the wetlands is going to create a significant problem for our coastal fisheries," Mendelssohn said.
People in Louisiana know just how vital the wetlands are and how much they stand to lose.
"The marshes are what I am afraid of," said Kathleen Barrilleaux, a 57-year-old cafeteria manager at an elementary school near New Orleans, sitting back in a fold-out chair at the end of a long day on the pier fishing with her family near Barataria Bay.
For now, she and her son-in-law, Joseph Breaux, a 41-year-old grain elevator worker, are upbeat.
"I don't see an oil slick or nothing," Breaux said. His two daughters and wife were going back and forth on the pier tending to a fishing line and crab nets.
He said he saw no signs of oil on the crabs they pulled in or on the croaker fish they caught.
"We're going to have us a crab boil," he said.
We should have more of these wetlands.
Oil! It's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes!
Good news, hopefully these aren't just the most resilient life forms. I fear that in an effort to keep the oil off of the land (dispersants, etc), they didn't completely destroy columns of eco systems in the water which will have an undesireable effect even outside of that water column.
I fear, however that they did
The Earth is quite resilient.
Apparently oil is less toxic than Brawndo.
I thought the hate-media was saying administration's "no oil anywhere, poof" announcement was a Dem plot to get bad news off the air.
Now, it's really true?
Which is it?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-12-2010 at 02:17 PM.
The grass always grows greener/better around the diesel tank at the ranch. The random drips/spills seem to be good for it...
Even if humans never existed, there would still be crude seeping out of the ground and under the sea.
Damn, that gets more stupid every time you repeat it.
Darrin, this is just a bad arguement. If there was some human made freak accident which began taking all of the oxygen out of the air and replacing it with nitrogen at an alarming rate, would this be ok? After all, even if humans never existed, there would still be nitrogen in the atmosphere.
Unfortunately nature can't evolve in less than a generation in order to develop defenses against a much higher concentration of chemical X
That's true...there could have been drunken whales...that could have run aground in Alaska...ripping up the sea bed...releasing tons of oil...or mad dolphin...who while playing rugby...disrupted the seabed floor causing oil to seep out in gushes...you know...naturally...
...everything must be OK then..."We're going to have us a crab boil, then a lynching" he said.
That's what I am thinking. Oil is good.
No No No! Oil is bad and we should stop using it and use something cleaner and greener and more available and cheaper. Which we could easily do if you would just pay more taxes!
Even better, let's give tax money to oil companies for the privilege of buying US drilling rights that they will never drill!
Did someone say RANDOM?
I thought I felt my ears burning.
Interesting. I wonder if the deisel isn't encouraging some nitrogen fixing bacteria growth, like a fertilizer.
Still, why don't you feed that grass to a cow exclusively, then kill and eat that cow exclusively until all the meat is gone?
That would be the ultimate "put your food where your mouth is".
If humans never existed there would still be heavy metals in water.
But, since we do exist, why don't you start getting all your drinking water downstream from a pit/coal mine trailing pile?
Go on, we're all waiting.
If humans never existed, there would still be naturally occuring benzene in the environment.
But since we do exist, why don't you drill a water well under the largest oil refinery in the US and drink out of that for a year?
My guess, is that you won't take me up on my challenge.
Why is that Darrin?
I used to live in Baytown. I'm not afraid of that shi <drops dead>.
LOL, so you see how ridiculous such a statement sounds.
Hey is all the news on the oil spill good?
Yep. All Hunky Dory. Obama kicked some ass and they plugged the damn hole.
Next.
Oh ok. Thanks.
there was actually even during the peak of the spill, less oil seeping out of the ground in the world than before people started drilling for it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
