this has what to do with the Spurs?
this has what to do with the Spurs?
Nothing new actually.
I'm still wondering if we're going to see the Spurs with those black-on-black jerseys.
I've now seen Utah, LA (Clippers), Cleveland and Minnesota with new jerseys.
He's a ing Jazz fan obviously...
The hornets no longer have the le of 'worst nba jerseys"
And a clueless poster
The fact that a team in Utah is called "Jazz" is just an insult to that music. They should have changed their name when they move to Salt Lake City. What a joke.
Wow, they look like crap.
honestly.. call me blind but.. i don't see much difference between that jersey and the jersey john stockton is wearing in the OP's avatar..
i hate when teams remodel their jersey by adding liek 1 or 2 lines to it.. it's like.. ok whats the point?
Team names can't all be as fitting as the "Lakers."![]()
oh, i never thought they did. the design was boring but i liked their colors. i thought the new red and blue sixers jerseys were a real copout and i'd vote them the worst
Yeah, I hate this too . . . now that there is a team in NOLA again, they should go back to being the Jazz, Utah can be the Grizzlies, and Memphis can be the Hornets . . . I mean I'm sure there are bears in Utah and wasps in Tennessee, right?
Oh, and those jerseys are throwbacks. They ain't new.
I've thought for a while that New Orleans and Utah should trade nicknames.
Utah is the Beehive State
Much better than the ones they had. New style with the retro logo.
I've heard Sacramento's got a new alternate jersey and it looks like Dallas and Houston both have some new duds:
I'm expecting to see that black-on-black Spurs jersey, but it might just be wishful thinking.
Yes, the Mavs picked up Tyson Chandler and the Rockets grabbed Brad Miller.
Most of your posts are beyond stupid, but that was pretty funny.
It looks like Spurs changed a little
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)