Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    What Toomey, and most other Republicans, oppose is not actual privatization, but the word “privatization.” Republicans used to use the word when discussing their plans for Social Security but in the fall of 2002, they made the linguistic slide away from the term en masse. They did this once it became known how poorly variants on the word “private” poll in regards to Social Security. Talking Points Memo do ented some Republicans making this shift:
    Rep. Chris Chocola (R) of Indiana before word came down from party headquarters (Nov. 1, 2000) …
    Bush’s plan of individual investment of 2 percent of the money is a start. Eventually, I’d like to see the entire system privatized. It’s not a ‘risky scheme.’
    Rep. Chris Chocola (R) of Indiana after word came down from party headquarters (Sept. 3rd, 2002) …
    I do not support the privatization of Social Security.
    Bob Novak before the word came down from party headquarters (Capitol Gang, Sept. 14th, 2002 where we find Mark Shields at mid-Outrage of the Week) …
    Mark Shields: In an Orwellian abuse of the language, conservatives, including even the respected Cato Ins ute, insist that they’re now for Social Security choice, not for dreaded ‘privatization’. Yes, and war is peace.


    http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/...aign=alternet#


    =======


    Do the Repugs EVER tell the truth about anything?

    America already knows how rigged, fraudulent, criminal "privatized" Wall St is.

    America already knows how gouging for-profit/privatized health care is.

    America already knows how gouging for-profit/privatized health insurance is.

    But America is mostly fat, dumb, and amnesiac, and the Repugs know it.

  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,011
    ^^^2002 culturkampf relic.

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    The Repugs are now not saying privatize social security, so there is nothing "2002" about their refusal to pronounce the word privatize when they talk about handing Soc Sec funds to Wall St Banksters.
    Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-26-2010 at 04:24 PM.

  4. #4
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,011
    (ahem) go ahead and say something if you want.

    (waiting)

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    How about GFY? matching your content-less posts

  6. #6
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    I can write bouton's posts with my eyes closed. Repug. America is ed. Pitbull . Copy and Paste truthout.borg.

    Yeah, that's real content.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    sure beats the "original" made-up you right-wingers drag in here

  8. #8
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,011
    It's your thread.

  9. #9
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,011
    The Repugs are now not saying privatize social security, so there is nothing "2002" about their refusal to pronounce the word privatize when they talk about handing Soc Sec funds to Wall St Banksters.
    Initially you made it sound as if the GOP were actually terrified by privatization; now you add the twist that it only fears that the public will attach the word *privatization* to its policies.


  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    You watch, they won't say the phrase "privatize social security" because dubya's fiasco with that attempt 5 years ago.

  11. #11
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    114,011
    Whatever dude. Why are you predicting infield banter?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •