Reply With Quote
Parker outplayed an MVP yet the Spurs fans don't care.
Interesting.
I'm shocked.
Parker outplayed an MVP yet the Spurs fans don't care.
Interesting.
No Brewski????
Nahhhh i wont hear of it.
ok
unless he really plays bad
timvp
tp has to play great 99.9 % to get credit
spur fans
It's hard to criticize him when he shows up and plays well. I don't think anybody hates him any more than they hate Brent Barry. We all want them to do well, but what's wrong with pointing it out when they don't?
Parker did good considering his opponent can't play a lick of defense. That being said, he still did his best to get the suns back into the game with his ty free throw shooting at the end.
Hang it up, man. Hang it up.
nothing wrong about critisizing but some have to find their nuts to give props when the players deserve them.
F*** the haters that just freaks me out to see people lurking around and waiting for mistakes to throw their hate and then just disapear.
Parker did good considering his opponent can't play a lick of defense
boy the sarcasm just drips.
It pains him to see parker do well you can just see it.
Some people are never happy. He missed that 2nd free throw on purpose to grab the rebound....
You seem to forget that I'm a Spurs fan T-Park. I love it when Parker does well. But I call em like I see em. Parker has mental lapses and doesn't play well as consistently as he should. Period. I'm sorry if the truth pisses you homers off that badly.
That might mean something if Parker didn't eat Nash's lunch for the most part.
Nash might be on a great streak but I don't know that you can say he was being guarded by top opposing guards.
Although the hate runs deep for this one, I think in general most even-minded Spurs fans expect Parker to resume what historically has been ownage of Nash.
Nash might be in a zone which allows him to get more points against Tony, but I think that MVP came with an asterisk*.
* defense not included
I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm excited as can be that Parker played well, and not just because I bet 200 of my last 275 bucks on him being the leading scorer in this game. I've said in other threads that he didn't have as good a game as he could have, and his confidence should be sky high. I'm ready to see him go off. He's got to be here in this series, because the Spurs are a different team when he's producing.
What!?! Aren't you the one who started the Spurs Sweep thread?
I didn't see the game, but did parker outplay him, looks like they have the same number of points
I won't be a moron and tell you to believe, but admit that you have at least a little hope. He's too good to go into a funk forever, just like Barry. This game was rather encouraging, you have to admit.
Don't know about all Spurs fans but I was happy as to see TP kick ass. Needs to keep it going.
with the way you rip the players???You seem to forget that I'm a Spurs fan T-Park
Yeah I do forget it.
"But I call em like I see em"
If that's true then you could have simply stated in your response that Parker had a good game instead of pointing out the fact that he was "playing against someone who doesn't play a lick of D and that he missed some FT's at the end."
Fact is no one on the Suns plays D, with maybe Marion being the exception, so are you trying to say ALL the spurs should have torched the Suns for 29 points?
We know Parker isn't the model of consistency, that he still has room for growth and improvement. The problem is, certain "spurs" fans like yourself seem to always magnify when the guy has a bad game, and make up excuses when he has a good game. He isn't as inconsistent as you make him out to be.
To Believe is not moronic...it is what true fans do.
But . . . but . . . Nash is the MVP.
(When he went from Phoenix to Dallas, he made two teams better.)
Comparing stats, Parker didn't outplay him, but Parker made his points within the flow of the game while Nash spent a lot of time spinning and falling away and looking for someone to pass to. Parker had a relatively quiet game and just took what he was given. Considering that the Mavericks said that they'd let Nash score 50 to win, and the Spurs held him to 30 is a pretty good omen. Nash got a lot of assists but Amare hit a lot of 18 foot jump shots, which I'm sure the Spurs will let him take all day long.
Let's ignore Manu choking at the line when the Spurs were done and desperate for points. He missed both when the Spurs really needed it.
But we'll ignore that so you can keep up with your anti-Parker stance.
Okay?
No, it's what cult members do. If you are refering to the origin of the word "fan" which is "fanatic" then you are correct. If you are referring to the modern definition of the word, then no. "True fans" is subjective, but to me true fans always root for their team, win or lose. But believing that a team is going to win no matter what doesn't make you a better fan than someone who doubts that they can do it but roots anyway. I've always hoped that the Spurs would do well, and I've always been happy when they've done well, and I've always been sad when they haven't, but I've never "believed". Well, at least not since '95.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
