Forbes: Knicks surpass Lakers/ Spurs not in top 5

[JayTheClown]

http://www.forbes.com/2011/01/26/kni...s_slide_2.html

These are the most valuable teams in the NBA. Its not surprising having the Knicks climb to the top considering they play in New York, but not having the Spurs in the top and having the Mavs at number 6 over the Spurs is puzzling.

[ALVAREZ6]

http://www.forbes.com/2011/01/26/kni...s_slide_2.html

These are the most valuable teams in the NBA. Its not surprising having the Knicks climb to the top considering they play in New York, but not having the Spurs in the top and having the Mavs at number 6 over the Spurs is puzzling.

It really isn't puzzling at all.


Grown men that are puzzled by this are simply morons.

Grown women are simply morons.

[JayTheClown]

[NRHector]

http://www.forbes.com/2011/01/26/kni...s_slide_2.html

These are the most valuable teams in the NBA. Its not surprising having the Knicks climb to the top considering they play in New York, but not having the Spurs in the top and having the Mavs at number 6 over the Spurs is puzzling.

it should puzzle you, that a team with less value than the Mavs is first at the standings and more than Mavs. Makes you think about all the money wasted all this years for nothing. Mavs FO should get fired.

[jjktkk]

http://www.forbes.com/2011/01/26/kni...s_slide_2.html

These are the most valuable teams in the NBA. Its not surprising having the Knicks climb to the top considering they play in New York, but not having the Spurs in the top and having the Mavs at number 6 over the Spurs is puzzling.

This was already posted on the Spurs Forum, but I'm curious as to why you think San Antonio isn't on the list is puzzling? Most small market teams in any pro sports are not ranked highly in regards of their worth financially. Big market teams are a more valuable commodity because of their market's size.