Reply With Quote
Goddamnit. You're right! That dirty rich bas can pay 50 percent taxes if her wants!!
...a political idiot.
Watch the whole thing if you like but, this is the quote I want to point out:
Allow me to answer. Stephen King pays 28% of his income, in taxes, because Stephen King doesn't want to pay 50% of his income to the federal government.
He could write a check for the other 22%, today, and mail it to:
Gifts to the United States
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Credit Accounting Branch
3700 East-West Highway, Room 622D
Hyattsville, MD 20782
Michael Moore can too. In fact, any Democrat who believes they're paying too little in taxes can send their money to the federal government. There's no law against paying more than your share.
Goddamnit. You're right! That dirty rich bas can pay 50 percent taxes if her wants!!
He only pays 28%?
Wow.
And he's so much better than yonivore.
Giant strawman argument.
The whole purpose of paying more taxes is to put a dent in the deficit. That's only going to happen if every wealthy person pays more, not just a few democrats who want to. And if they did, it wouldn't be just that only patriotic democrats paid more taxes anyway.
Actually, the only thing that's going to put a dent in our debt or deficit is if the government quits spending money.Giant strawman argument.
The whole purpose of paying more taxes is to put a dent in the deficit. That's only going to happen if every wealthy person pays more, not just a few democrats who want to. And if they did, it wouldn't be just that only patriotic democrats paid more taxes anyway.
I'm with Yoni on this one. If Stephen King is truly that bothered by how undertaxed he is, there's nothing stopping him from sending Uncle Sam more than he's required to. Lead by example if you're that passionate about it.
Contrary to Yoni's belief, there is nothing wrong with a member of the top bracket believing members of that bracket should pay more.
There's even less wrong with believing he should pay more if that's what he believes.
Someone should provide Mr. King with the address.
Oh yeah, I can just see every investment banker in America flocking to his accountant because Stephen King is suddenly paying more taxes. Good grief.
I agree, there isn't anything wrong with that. Nor is there anything wrong with paying more taxes than you owe if you feel that strongly about it. Voluntarily paying more certainly doesn't forfeit your right to continue believing your fellow top bracketers should be required to follow your example. If anything, voluntarily paying more would give King additional credibility.
Like I just said, King voluntarily paying more would in no way invalidate his right to think that those investment bankers should be paying more. If he's really that bothered by it, step up!
Come to think of it, if you're really bothered by it, you can step up too! Although I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that you feel you are adequately taxed. Only people making more than you aren't paying their fair share.
People don't have to follow or agree with King. My point is that if he feels he should be paying more to the federal government, there's nothing stopping him.
I would GLADLY pay more if OTHER people would ALSO pay more. I'm not going to unfairly carry the burden that republicans would have shared if everyone were paying the Pre-Bush Tax Cut rates. Paying taxes is not fun, but it’s crucial to the health of our government.
And exactly what point do you think King is making? I'm genuinely curious.
King's philosophy on taxation is about as half-baked as the second halves of all of his novels. Why is this relevant?
I dunno, man. It seems like the government gives tax breaks/assistance to corporations/banks whenever no one is looking (which lowers its revenue to pay for ), then those corporations/banks go and nickle/dime consumers (which makes people spend more money which causes them to need some sort of assistance). It's just hard to find wisdom in the god-fearing GOP/Gangster Dems refusal to increase revenue while companies/banks seem to with consumers and make record profits.
the "health" of the government. It can't make do on a measly 3 tril?
What wondrous pets we are to blindly accept some moral obligation to fund a class of politicians and bureaucrats and their cluster masterpiece.
The greatest share of the cluster masterpiece is authored by the republicans. Democrats are the ones who usually have to try and fix it. And if a Democrat said the government's health, he'd be label an anti-american terrorist muslim.
If you can afford it and honestly believe you should be paying higher taxes, I think you have a moral obligation to start sending in the money. Don't let others dictate your morality.
I'm not sure. If he truly believes he should be paying more to the federal government, there's nothing stopping him from doing so.
How quaint. Those poor Democrat politicians, why they're the good team, not like those bad Republicans.
I don’t believe I should be paying more taxes, I believe WE should be paying more taxes.
I know.
Speak for yourself. I think WE should be spending less money.
Yonivore, you can help Uncle Sam spend less by sending back your SS checks.
I am speaking for myself, hence "I THINK".
And I THINK WE should be spending less money too. But cutting discretionary spending isn't going to do . And cutting the major en lement programs is going to send a chunk of America into the third world.
You're only addressing half (maybe even less) of the problem.
I don't get Social Security. And, when (or if) they do start, I'll start returning them when I get all I've put in back, plus interest.
Better yet, I'll probably donate the money to a charity. I certainly won't need it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
