Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    N.J. lawmakers targeting people who photograph children without parental consent

    For Ringwood homemaker Amy Conklin, something needed to be done.

    Last summer, a 63-year-old man was seen taping children at a local swim meet. Police say when confronted he told them he found girls 8 to 10 sexy.

    But the authorities could only charge the man, who they say had a history of similar run-ins with the police, with trespassing and disorderly conduct — and those charges were later dropped.

    "Our town is in an uproar," said Conklin, who was on vacation when the incident occurred. Otherwise, she said, her own children would have been there. "He is free to do as he wishes because these innocent 8-year-old girls were not naked when he videotaped them."

    Such legislation, which is being considered by the Assembly Judiciary Committee, would step into a cons utional minefield.

    The bill would ban photographs or recordings of children when "a reasonable parent or guardian would not expect his child to be the subject of such reproduction."

    Read more

  2. #2
    All Hail the Legatron The Reckoning's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    10,568
    stupid idea. so one perverts actions are going to end up with laws that infringe on our rights? ok.

  3. #3
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    I thought all the perverts started working for the TSA.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "infringe on our rights"

    That's how the bureaucratic police state works. Identify a crime (how about invent one? same as inventing a drug, then invent the "disease"), make a law/regulation that infringes the rights of 99.9% of the people who are innocent, and that can always be used to frame/blackmail/intimidate innocent people into "pleading" or "settling" so the police state can fulfill its quota while targeted criminals continue their crimes unimpeded.

    perfect example: airport security radiations and physical assault where every Human-American is a suspected criminal.

    OBL is laughing his ass off at how he tricked America into wasting $Ts, wasting 1000s of military, and destroying civil liberties. The evil that America does to itself lives on after OBL is dead. OBL's 9/11 and its permanent effects were absolutely brilliant.
    Last edited by boutons_deux; 05-06-2011 at 09:16 AM.

  5. #5
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    Bad idea. Too prone to error/abuse.

  6. #6
    Ain't over 'till its over MaNuMaNiAc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    12,900
    Overly protective parents can go themselves. I'm all for prosecuting child molesters but its practically getting to the point where you can't even look a child without someone thinking you must be a pervert. Its ridiculous.

  7. #7
    2nd Verse Same as the 1st Oh, Gee!!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    8,869
    what do you think about the proposed law, chancellor merkel?



    oh, you don't like it?

  8. #8
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    I thought all the perverts started working for the TSA.
    Nice.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •