Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    The Republican plan to eliminate another 300,000 jobs

    Because nothing says economic recovery like eliminating 300,000 jobs, Orrin Hatch and Tom Coburn are looking to reduce the federal workforce by that much, in addition to freezing salaries and cutting contract workers and travel budgets.

    Under the bill, S. 1476, salaries and bonuses would be frozen for three years, which Hatch said amounts to $140 billion in reduced spending over 10 years.

    And I'm sure we wouldn't lose any highly qualified experts who could be earning far more in the private sector but are instead keeping us all safe at FEMA and the CDC. In a wage freeze, it's all too likely that the people who have options leave.

    It would also require the administration to cut the size of the federal workforce by 15 percent over 10 years, amounting to 300,000 fewer workers. "This could easily be accomplished through attrition and would save taxpayers over $225 billion over that time," Hatch said.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/0...28Daily+Kos%29

  2. #2
    on instagram, str8 flexin DUNCANownsKOBE's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    19,109
    lol Orrin Hatch
    lol racist Mormon who still supports segregation

  3. #3
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Losing federal jobs? Darn

  4. #4
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,150
    They couldn't care less about jobs.

    I think Darrin and them are still looking for Obama's birth certificate.

  5. #5
    $200 cash 4>0rings's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    6,882
    good

  6. #6
    My Playlist > Yours Pistons < Spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    27,176
    300,000 over a 10 year span? Who the cares.

    I'd like to see a far bigger reduction in federal employees ... at a much quicker pace.

  7. #7
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    300,000 over a 10 year span? Who the cares.

    I'd like to see a far bigger reduction in federal employees ... at a much quicker pace.
    Same here

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    but you hate-and-kill-govt haters give the big banks, capitalists, and corps a pass.

    It's not the 300K fed employees that have bankrupted the govt and run the lower 95% into a deep and long ditch.

    You guys aim for the wrong target like dubya aiming for Iraq.

  9. #9
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Employment Summary, Part Time Workers, and Unemployed over 26 Weeks

    http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/

  10. #10
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,414
    They already threw 70,000 construction workers out of their jobs.

  11. #11
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    Don't forget the 10-20 million who lost their jobs under the last GOP administration...

  12. #12
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    [Our] analysis suggests that unions helped shape the allocation of wages not just for their members, but across the labor market. The decline of US labor and the associated increase in wage inequality signaled the deterioration of the labor market as a political ins ution.…The de-politicization of the US labor market appears self-reinforcing: as organized labor’s political power dissipates, economic interests in the labor market are dispersed and policymakers have fewer incentives to strengthen unions or otherwise equalize economic rewards.

    …[Prior to 1973,] unions offered an alternative to an unbridled market logic, and this ins utional alternative employed over a third of all male private sector workers. The social experience of organized labor bled into nonunion sectors, contributing to greater equality overall. As unions declined, not only did the logic of the market encroach on what had been the union sector, but the logic of the market deepened in the nonunion sector, too, contributing to the rise in wage inequality.

    http://motherjones.com/print/125892

    =========

    Winner-take-all, smash-mouth, kick-butt political economy.

    de-unionized, marginalized, isolated labor, for those who still have jobs, loses big, mgmt and investors take all (of the pie).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •