Reply With Quote
Good clip.
Media shepherding the sheep...nothing to see here...
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mo...--the-top-tier
Good clip.
That was pretty funny.
damn funny.
That's why the media rules over the minds of America.
Youve been ruled by Glenn Beck and that other fat bas for quite some time now.
This isn't Ron Paul's first dance with irrelevance.
I'm confused by this statement. Are you saying he's irrelevant to the media, or that he's just irrelevant? According to Iowa, he's more relevant than Bachmann.
I think he's trying to say that until his media sources of choice tell him this is a relevant candidate, Ron is irrelevant to him.
Darrin is an unapologetic kool-aid consumer.
Mainstream media is ting their pants over the prospect of Ron Paul being taken seriously. Their agenda is so clear it's pathetic.
Is that what those voices tell you?
Hmm, any bets on how well Ron Paul does after Iowa?
Hard to say. The people, as a whole, are pissed off at both normal democrat and republican pla udes. Paul looks pretty good to so many now.
Here are results from 2007:
1. Mitt Romney 4,516 31.6%
2. Mike Huckabee 2,587 18.1%
3. Sam Brownback 2,192 15.3%
4. Tom Tancredo 1,961 13.7%
5. Ron Paul 1,305 9.1%
6. Tommy Thompson 1,039 7.3%
7. Fred Thompson 203 1.4%
8. Rudy Giuliani 183 1.3%
9. Duncan Hunter 174 1.2%
10. John McCain 101 0.7%
11. John H. Cox 41 0.3%
It was a good clip. Ron Paul deserves more attention and credit than he is getting.
Stick that in yer pipe...
I would be willing to bet he does a bit better than he did last election, but that isn't saying much.
DarkHorse IMO.
I think he'll be able to consistently finish 3rd or 4th in most state primaries.
Given that he obviously doesn't have the support of Fox "News", that is the kiss of death for a Republican contender, barring some truly earthshattering convulsion in the landscape of Republicanland.
........ that doesn't make any sense either. It doesn't answer my question at all, nor does it have any merit to the present.
Sure it does. Popularity in Iowa doesn't translate to popularity nationally and the msm knows this. They also have better sources of polling data.
The candidates essentially just buy these straw poll votes. The cost to attend and vote is $30, and the campaigns usually pay for the tickets and for transportation for their sheep (I mean voters). Ron Paul supposedly spend the most on his campaign's booth.
If he got elected the machine would take him out anyways. This joke country doesn't deserve Lord Ronald Paulson the I, aka Captain America, aka The Last Beacon of Liberty.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
