Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28
  1. #1
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    The first top-to-bottom audit of the Federal Reserve uncovered eye-popping new details about how the U.S. provided a whopping $16 trillion in secret loans to bail out American and foreign banks and businesses during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

    http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/n...3-62060dcbb3c3

    Link to the GAO report:
    http://sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/...estigation.pdf

  2. #2
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473

  3. #3
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    Holding up TARP as a moneymaker is a bit misleading in the context of $16T in secret loans.

  4. #4
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    Holy .

  5. #5
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    I had no idea that the TARP was only 3% of the bailout. That's a lot of dough.

  6. #6
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    250 pages or so, not couting the BS at the end. Have to wait until the weekend to read. Fascinating skimming though. Gotta get going.

  7. #7
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Figure 26 illustrates a typical swap line transaction, in which FRBNY
    exchanged dollars for the foreign central bank’s currency at the prevailing
    exchange rate and the foreign central bank agreed to buy back its
    currency (to “unwind” the exchange) at this same exchange rate at an
    agreed upon future date. The foreign central bank would then lend the
    dollars to banks in its jurisdiction. Foreign central banks assumed the risk
    of losses on these dollar loans
    and paid FRBNY the interest collected on
    these loans. FRBNY did not pay interest on the foreign currency it
    received under the swap lines. To avoid difficulties that could arise for
    foreign central banks in managing the level of their currency reserves,
    FRBNY agreed not to lend or invest the foreign currency.
    The majority of the money in these programs appear, to my quick reading to be under a dollar swap (short short term liquidity) and most of that to one en y, the European Central Bank, which racked up about $8T

    Not sure what they base the 16T figure on though, but I would guess that is part of it.

    FWIW.

    (edit)
    Note, this is not one big loan, but a series of short term smaller loans, I think. Still reading, but this kind of smaller activity isn't quite as bad/risky as massive loans. Looks bigger than it was at any one time.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536

  9. #9
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473

  10. #10
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    The majority of the money in these programs appear, to my quick reading to be under a dollar swap (short short term liquidity) and most of that to one en y, the European Central Bank, which racked up about $8T.
    Massive foreign aid.

  11. #11
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    It really is getting to be like the old joke that the international monetary system is a gang of guys staggering home drunk from the bar. They're all pretty woozy, they're all holding each other up, and they'll all be fine...as long as nobody falls down.

  12. #12
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    (drinkin, not thinkin)
    Last edited by Winehole23; 07-22-2011 at 02:10 AM.

  13. #13
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976

  14. #14
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    2,683
    exponential growth is a

  15. #15
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Unregulated capitalism is a wonder to behold.

    That's why the Banksters have paid the Repugs $30M in a year to kill the CFPB as "overreaching". $30M? that's well below the roundoff error in the financial sector.

  16. #16
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    bump.

    still mind blowing, and but for Bloomberg's lawsuit, would still be a secret.

  17. #17
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    interesting discussion of the revealed figures here:

    http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/...n_those_s.html

  18. #18
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976

  19. #19
    Veteran EVAY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    7,563
    interesting discussion of the revealed figures here:

    http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/...n_those_s.html
    WH, I read some but not all of this. Will get back to it tomorrow, but one takeaway that I think I got is that the Prof's analysis of what the Fed was doing in 7.7T number is flawed inasmuch as it implies that the loans are all that money at the same time and never repaid. But that if fact, the 7.7 number is a total of smaller numbers being loaned and repaid over and over a period of time.

    Did I understand the econbrowser thing correctly?

  20. #20
    Veteran
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    8,957
    America is ed.

  21. #21
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    My takeaway is that the bottom line is wrong by at least a factor of five. $1.5T is still a real amount of money, though.

  22. #22
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    leaving wholly to one side, naturally, the $8T or so offered abroad, which for all I know may be a figure similarly flawed. even still, $2T is a real amount of money, and the terms were outrageously easy imho.

  23. #23
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    the lender of last resort did not inflict the customary penalty rates for usage, so as to discourage the use.

  24. #24
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    the apt time-value of money teaching unit, would be apropos I think. I do not possess it.

  25. #25
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    regardless, we're all socialists now

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •