Reply With Quote
You'll never get used to hearin' them chains...
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
Kobe :5
Duncan: 4
The age old dilema. Used mostly by laker "fans" who are stupid or trolls, ussualy it's both.
The use of rings to define a players greatness is so stupid, you can be really good and never get a ring. You aren't guranteed one for being good ex. Barkley
What really pisses me off is this argument being used to define how good a player is. Like Duncan vs. Kobe
Duncan is better in practically every Stat that truly mattered. He used to scare defenses out of the paint with his eyes alone. Kobe's waiting to cherypick.
I'm really tired and angry and Im not Sure what my true point is. It's probably " don't be an un-informed asshat"
Thanks for reading my rant
You'll never get used to hearin' them chains...
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
Horry > Jordan
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
Is anyone listening???
Oh well I'll keep going.
^It's got Matt up there snortin' pretty good.
tee, hee.
May I interject that your dialect intrigues me. Its mix of colloquialisms and subs utions of /n/ in place of /ŋ/ is at once literary and archaic.
That is all.
Thank you. Now sit on it.
In ringz argument logic...
Fisher = Bryant
It's a dead heat at 5.
You can have that one. I'm stickin' with:::
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
He raped.
Cully, how you gonna feel when it's::
Fisher: 6
Rapist: 5?
Cully, how you gonna feel when it's::
Fisher: 6
Rapist: 5?
Jordan:6
Colorado Rapist/ LA Wife Cheater:5
Wife/Child beater:O
ya all loser cubby.
Jordan 6
TODB 5
I'd never grudge Fish.
You got nary room. Your Neal raped just like my Kobe.
Fine. You're O & 43!!!
IT's THE ONLY ARGUMENT I NEED SEAN!!
Pippen 6
Kobe 5
Both played same role
Fine. You take that. I'm stickin' to:::
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
Dale bragged about beating his children, too?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
