Reply With Quote
shut your mouth!
will sign spurs or return europe?
shut your mouth!
He's not a free agent.
uuu player option. but i didn't hear he used it. am i qrong? he could get better offers from europe.
Last edited by turkish spurs fan; 07-31-2012 at 09:02 AM.
Team option means the Team chooses whether or not they pick up his contract, not the player. If they decide not to then he becomes a FA. Though I haven't been able to find anything about the Spurs picking up his option for 2012-2013, the fact that he is signed for the minimum and is one of the league's clutch 3-point shooters (making him one of the few trading pieces the Spurs have), I doubt the Spurs wouldn't exercise their team option.
Sham says it's an unguaranteed year, so there's no "pickup" date on any option. I still think he could be gone in trade, along with Blair. They are both cheap, proven, rotation pieces. They are also unguaranteed, and could be used to get below the tax for a team slightly over it.
Thanks, I knew it wasn't guaranteed, but didn't know that meant there was no pickup deadline.
Gary needs to stay a Spur. He's our best scorer outside of the big 3... better than Jackson...tbh
Jackson was here a short time after the trade, still had a better playoffs than he! Leonard can be better as well, hence the word CAN! I think Danny Green is more versatile as well, Gary is a spot up three shooter IMO with little else, but if he is the best sides the Big three in your mind cool! I disagree though, others can and will be alot better next year IMO, period.
Ideally we could package Neal, Blair, Bonner and Bonner for someone like Ilyasova (who is basically a combination of Blair and Bonner's skillsets, but a better defender) and the team would be set... but that's a pipedream.
I like Gary, can see him staying, but it's a mighty crowded backcourt. I think that unless there's an enticing trade in the offering the FO will keep Neal and play him in the first half of the season to show him off and give De Colo time to adjust. Then, hopefully, they can package him with Bonner/Blair for a player that fits a team need. That's the smart thing to do, and our FO has proven time and again that most of the time they're pretty smart.
I agree with you that Neal is not the 4th best scorer on the team. But he can shoot off the dribble, has a floater and showed an impressive versatility when attacking the basket. The problem is his defense ...
Gary Neal is an "instant offense" guard whose ball-handling skills are suspect - but the Spurs are keeping him for now because guys like him on rookie contracts are a rarity.
Not his decision making? He consistently takes bad shots with plenty of time left on the shot clock. He's a ball stopper, I think he's expendable especially considering this damn log jam at both guard spots.
Manu misses a lot every season and, in Leonard and Jack, Pop has the right players for small ball. The Spurs need Neal, he will play much better at SG.
Pop will let the best players prove themselves in training camp
he has player option. i was sleepy bro.
Hoopshype is the only place that lists it as a player option, everywhere else says its a team option. If it was a player option and he was opting out, he would have done it prior to July 1st to enter free agency. Doesn't make sense to do it once all the NBA has capped themselves out.
Taking him out of the backup PG role fixes a lot of that.
.
That said, the offense was surprisingly decent with him running point until OKC.
Exactly. He would be great on a team like the Bulls that need some scoring and have the D to cover-up his deficiencies on that end. However the Spurs front-court limitations on D really minimize the impact Neal has given he is such a liability on defense.
The problem is the sheer number of guards on the roster.
Parker, Mills, De Colo, Green, Ginobili and Neal can't all fit into one rotation. And thats already with Cory Joseph on the outside looking in.
I heard a rumor that Jacque Vaughn is wanting to take Gary Neal with him to Orlando. I was at the golf course and several men were talking about a trade that would get the Spurs a big in trade for Neal and not cost cap money. Looking at that, I found the only trade that was a big and netted no cap problem was getting Justin Harper. Would he be worth trading for Neal? Unless there is a 3rd team involved I dont see any other trade that would happen.
Would be interesting. The guy is a tweener and a bit undersized (just under 6'9). Supposedly has a good shot and has 3-pt range, though given the lack of NBA experience that remains to be seen.
One of the biggest knocks against him was he didn't have the weight and muscle to defend NBA PFs on the low-block but hes added about 20-30 pounds since he was drafted.
I doubt he would be much more than a project for the next year or two but the FO may see it as getting a project rather than nothing for Neal.
Harper makes some sense. Good shooting range, decent size for a PF and he played in the French league. Seems like the type of player the Spurs would target.
The Magic took Nicholson in the draft, so he could very well be available.
Last edited by benefactor; 08-02-2012 at 06:47 PM.
God help the team that trades for choo-choo...he's the quintessential spurs-system guy who would toil in obscurity on any other team--much like Danny Green.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
