Reply With Quote
How believable Levitt is as young Willis?
surprised there wasn't already a thread about this movie. Really cool idea and done almost perfectly. The first 2/3's of the movie are incredible, after that it gets a little lost and overly sentimental, and the ending won't blow you away. But this is a really cool little sci-fi flick.
How believable Levitt is as young Willis?
He gets enough of Bruce's voice and mannerisms to be believable, but not distracting. The makeup/prosthetics aren't great, but it doesn't look so bad that it distracts from the story.
Excellent, that was my one possible problem with the movie.. Otherwise, it looks pretty good(91% on rotten tomatoes).
Does it focus on the time travel or is it mainly an action flick?
It's a good mix of both, but there really isn't a lot of time traveling in the movie.
I cant take Levvit seriously. He's always been kind of a backseat actor.
Does he carries himself well on his own or does he depend on other characters as usual?
Joseph Gordon-Levitt is a good actor. nothing more, nothing less. however it is a bit annoying how many people (particularly the under 30 crowd) are hyping this guy up to be the greatest young actor out there. he did a great job in 50/50 and has been solid in some roles, but for every good role he takes he then s the bed in other roles. his film selection is also very poor as well.
Levitt falls into the Shia LaBeouf category for me ... just less bag
Comparing Gordon-Levitt to La is a major insult.
Mysterious Skin, Brick, The Lookout, Inception, The Dark Knight Rises, 50/50, and now this...what does Shia have that can compare?
Hesher was good, too.
Looper was a great movie! My wife and I loved it! It's definitely a movie that will keep you thinking! Willis was awesome as usual and Levitt was very believable as a young Willis! The acting was great, the script was great and that little kid stole the show! 9/10 for me.
Movie was pretty cash. I didn't like the ending all that much, but it could have been worse.
Just got done seeing this - really, really good movie. BR wrong as usual about actors. JGL has done a lot of really solid roles.
Did you ever go watch V/H/S brah
Not yet, want to though.
it's pretty creepy, don't want you to have nightmares about a certain big bad injun in your closet i saidddd
not corny or lame like the other "found footage" genre movies..definitely bizarre and disturbing to say the least.
Describes you to a T, tbh.
Yup that's probably why I enjoyed the movie so much
JGL hasn't proven himself to be anything more than a good supporting actor. Nolan guzzlers will say otherwise.
JGL played supporting roles in Nolan movies, so why would anybody use them to show that he is a capable leading man?
-SPOILERS-
Was suicide really the best option? When Young Joe realized that a cycle of revenge would be created, I thought Old Joe would, too, but nope, Blunderbuss to the chest.
I was thinking the same thing, but that's probably not as dramatic for an audience to see.
My only problem was the cliche "precocious child with issues" storyline. I understand why it's in there but it made the 2nd half of the film less focused and a bit cheesy, especially the "it's okay, i love you" moment at the end.
I was wondering why blowing his shooting fingers/hand off was not an option.
That's what I was thinking, too.
The movie is also one big causal loop, too. The Rainmaker was brought into existence because Old Joe was trying to eliminate him from existing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
