Reply With Quote
good idea..might aswell trade Beno for Kirk while your at it
how about a Tyson Chandler or Eddie Curry sign-n-trade for Rasho
good idea..might aswell trade Beno for Kirk while your at it
Why would the Bulls want Rasho for one of their youngens? You might be able to get Curry, but...
The Bulls would never do that.
But if they somehow lost their minds and sent one of those guys to SA in a sign and trade, I would welcome either one of them with open arms.
I know Tyson is better, but if the Spurs could get either one of them for Rasho, it would be a heck of a steal...err....i mean, deal.
No I dont think anyone is that dumb. May Isaiah Thomas is, but I dont think that even he would make that deal.
Curry is a scrub, and Chandler has back problems already at his age.
What's the latest on Curry's heart condition? He isn't that good to take any risk on.
He hasn't been cleared to play.What's the latest on Curry's heart condition?
Firstly, both of them are better than Rasho.
Second, Eddy Curry is better than Rasho.
aaaaaaaaaand Third, Tyson Chandler is better than Rasho.
Both are younger and have mutally the same contracts. Even if we did get them we couldnt keep both.
In 28.7 minutes, Curry averaged 16.1 pts (he would never score that here)/5.4r/0.9blks
In 25 minutes Rasho averaged 5.9pts/6.4r/1.7blks. A white guy who can barely get off the ground rebounds better and blocks more shots than Curry.
Curry is a scrub.
Care to support your opinion with a fact? Two, if you are really drunk.
I wouldn't give up a good defensive 7 footer for either one of those mediocre players.
I wouldn't trade Rasho for any of those 2 players. They're not that great.
omg stop being such homers..
Im sick of SA people saying Rasho > Curry, Parker > Marbury, Manu > Kobe and so on...
Rasho >>> Curry. If you think otherwise, post some facts to back it. Curry is a scrub.
fact is, every GM would choose Curry instead of Rasho if they had to chose... yes even RC...
I know I can't prove it, but sometimes you have to stop thinking too much and just use common sense
Age is a factor Exstatic, Curry is what 22 or something. That being said he has a heart conditioon aand hasn't been cleared to play yet. This argument is a non issue while that is the case. Another thing, he cannot rebound to save his life. Had a 0 rebound performance against us I recall.
With a heart condition? When he hasn't been cleared to play? When the defensive numbers on the 7 footer are better and the guy would be coming into a system where a defensive center is paramount and scoring a mere bonus if he's open?
Your second sentence says it all. You can't prove it - there is no common sense about it. Look around - most people on here want Rasho gone. Homerism has nothing to do it with it, O Ye of 'Common Sense.'
Heart condition aside its a no brainer
Rasho averages what, 1.5 more rebounds a game? The man has had the huge advantage of playing next to the two best power forwards in the game his whole career and has done jack. Since his Minny days coaches have tried to get him to dunk the ball when open under the basket but its not his nature.Instead we get to see him throw up 2 foot bricks. He also has peaked and im not convinced the spurs win a le with Rasho as the center. The only thing i will give him credit for is being 7 foot tall and learning pops defensive system well.
Curry at 22 had the lazy tag most of his career but took the first step this past season and improved his game. He is way ahead of Rasho offensively and would flourish on a diciplined team like the spurs. He needs to get away from his entourage that have followed him since high school. The potential is there for him to be a top 3 center
No one outside of SA fans would take Rasho over Curry (assuming he's healthy).
I don't think the bulls have isiah running things.
In Curry's 2 games against the Spurs this past season, Curry pulled in exactly 1 rebound. That's not a typo - 1.
Rasho's 2 games matched up against Curry were not stellar, but he did manage to pull in 18 boards.
of course im talking about curry being healthy, otherwise it shouldnt even be an argument...
Since you cant also prove that every gm in the nba would take tim duncan over olivier miller, would you also argue that miller > duncan?
I mean, rasho isnt even close to curry...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
