Reply With Quote
No really?
I've been screami g this same since at least 2009, Boner is a Massive liability on the court and we will NEVER win a lr wth him getting significant minutes. He played less today, spurs win.
d
HE IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN THE ALBATROSS. SPURS CAN WIN BUT WONT UNTIL HE IS RELEGATED HIS RIGHTFULL ROLE AS A STEVE KERR TYPE SPOT MINUTES SET PLAY FOR 3 POINTER TYPE PLAYER
No really?
You Forgot Blair and Neal!!
water is wet
The team that scores more point usually wins
Blair doesn't continue to get the big minutes Boner still does.
lol at least Bonner did good work against Dwight Coward.
The team who holds the opposing team to less points than they score usually wins too. :P
This.
Calling him horrible is an insult to horrible defenders.
He had a couple sequences in the post where he held his ground tonight...
No Sherlock
Still better than Blair, sadly.
And hey, Bonner gave one of the real frontcourt players 6 minutes of rest in the first half and didn't lose the game in those 6 minutes. I'll take it with no complaints.
grass green thread
Wtf is wrong with you, yes, he is a HORRIBLE defender and always has been, the other team goes on runs when he is on the fllor, they have since 2009, even the announcer ALWAYS point out the mismatch with Boner no matter who they are playing
Ice is cold, especially dry ice.
he's pretty much useless when he's not hitting 3s
Anybody that was watching knows he's in no way better than Blair in this series. If he hadn't hustled for two offensive boards in the second game there would be literally nothing good to say about him. He cost the Spurs plenty in his six minutes while the other guys played 4 on 5. Would rather have had Mills in his spot tonight.
Quite simply, if there's an advanced stat that disproves what is plainly visible on the court, like missed rotations, failing to put his hands in the air on defense, failure to box out, bad fouls, and failure to hit his shots, then that advanced stat is being misinterpreted by you.
OV going to work tbh
Charlie Sheen just want to show he can defend better than Bonner by defending Bonner from haters.
BONNER ING SUCKS, thats all. Charlie SHEEN OFF, you are a clown he sucks. I am convinced he is that Chazley idiot.
If Pop doesn't think he can lean on Duncan, Splitter, and Diaw for 96 minutes, then he basically has a choice of which turd he wants to make a sandwich out of for a few minutes. Bonner was lousy, but not so lousy that he cost us the game. Maybe Blair would be a less awful turd in this series, but maybe not.
And after the rolling disaster that was playing small ball, the last thing in the world that I want to see is smallball with freaking Mills on the floor. Parker and Joseph are decent defenders who are undersized, and Golden State has taken advantage of them. Gary Neal requires opponents to account for him on the other end of the court. Mills is undersized for this series, a bad defender in the best of times, and weak as an offensive threat. I'd play Baynes at the 3 before I'd let Mills on the court in this series.
LOL the Irony from this dip ! He wants us to lose if you ask me! His team is the LAKERS, this is why this in dip pushes BONNER! Thats the only explanation!GOOD GOD why in 2013 are we still talking about F in Bonner and Blair and who is worse and who we should play! OUR LIVES! DAMN! LOL.
I don't think he's serious about Mills, He was just pointing out how bad Bonner on D.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
