LMAO, what a ing pussy. You take my ing pants, you're at the LEAST gonna feel a few punches .
and protect yourself. Don't let people get away because they are female.
LMAO, what a ing pussy. You take my ing pants, you're at the LEAST gonna feel a few punches .
Man this is some serious stuff, no not really.
How is this handled if we were say..in 1945, Avante?
You mean back before garbage TV, R rated movies, gangsta rap, you could smoke anywhere, blacks had to sit at the back of the bus, sexuality was a disease, back then? Those girls would have been seen as sex perverts and sick in the head. Probably would have spent time in some sanitarium.
Of course there was no youtube back then so in reality it would have been his word against theirs, and the boy might have been looked at as being crazy for not wanting two cute little girls in his pants.
Men were men back then. Shaved with a straight razor, smoked Camels, read kickers. A sissy male....oh stop, stop, help help...wouldn't cut it.
Last edited by Avante; 05-22-2013 at 03:54 AM.
Slightly fixed.
Well since that drug didn't become available until 1972, hmmmmm?
So they cause the nudity, film it themselves, and post it online themselves? How is this not child pornography?
and yeah, the little pussy should've been kicking and swinging, wondering if he's not all there mentally
id be looking for an orgy tbh. kid should have manned up and started chasing them with his pants down.
This incident is a couple of years old. I read that the kid's mom decided the girls should not be prosecuted and should be punished by their parents instead.
http://www.fox4now.com/multimedia/vi...=1118805161001
At that age none of you gots would've done except fight them away. Your shrimp s would be so shriveled up you would've died to avoid it being unveiled.
if es want to have equal rights as men they ought to take equal responsibilities as well, being female ain't no excuse for being a stupid arrogant tbh. the world that feminists desire ain't one where men and women are treated equally, but one that resembles a matriarchy where females can all over their men for fun, and i do believe it's every man's responsibility to prevent that from coming true
holy that is ing criminal. hang those little s.
the more i think about it, the more this pisses me off. we've become such a backwards feminist cuck society that women think they can get away with anything like that arias sociopath recently in the news. and even the kid's mother is at fault, selling out her own son and not prosecuting just because the culprits are a couple of es. had it been boys who did this to a girl, they'd be registered sex offenders with their lives ruined. now this kid is going to grow up to hate women (for good reason) and whenever he beats the out of his wife we're going to have to hear abouthow evil men are
all i've got to say is these little s better be glad it wasn't my son they molested, or i'd strip their asses butt naked in front of the whole town and hang them in front of city hall with their s and clit chopped off.
You can't be serious, with all the genuine meanness we see today, something like that shouldn't even register. If it were sisters and a brother we wouldn't even know about it. It was the giggles that gave it away, that and youth. Kids acting silly, that's all we saw there. There was no meanness involved there. Ignorance, yes.
What would you do if something really important happened?
Yep. Nothing mean about forcefully removing somebody's clothes and filming it. It's all just jokes.
Oh give me a break, everytime a girl gets raped the first thing every guy says is ,"Shes bull ting, that dude is innocent for sure."
We are talking kids here who had a giggle fest while doing it. Wow, talk about some serious , there it was. If my son came home...dad dad two girls unpants me....I'd tell him..."lucky you".
This was absolutely nothing.
Oh, okay. Since they laughed about it, that makes it fine.
Intent means everything. Did you really see that as mean vicious behavior or simply ignorance of youth? Come on man even a nut job like you can't be that damn dense.
Wow big damn deal some little boy got unpants by a couple giggling little girls.
It is mean, vicious behavior. The fact that they were laughing while they sit it, makes it worse. They should be punished.
Woo, are you for real?
Wow~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ok man, we have to talk about degree here. If I were to strike a match and burn you , I burned you, now what if I took a blow torch and burned you, see the difference, ya don't do you?
Just how big a deal do we make of this? So we shoot the girls, hang them, stone them to death, of course not. This was nothing in the gand scheme of things. Absolutely nothing when we compare it to kids and stabbings, shootings, beatings, drugs, rape, hopefully you know the difference, ya don't do ya?
This wasn't sisters and a brother and regardless if that happened in public and was filmed and posted online we absolutely would here about it. And wtf is "genuine meanness" to you? There are levels of mean behavior. Just because they didn't beat him or cut his nuts off doesn't mean this isn't ed up.
Who says that and how is that relevant?
You'd be a ty dad. And what does the giggling have to do with it?
You can't be that dense or should I say blind? What do you think we really saw there, do you even know? We saw a couple goofy girls thinking they were funny. We weren't looking at a mean vicious attack.
And I'm a great dad to bad yours didn't teach you any manners.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)