Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Veteran InRareForm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    8,644

  2. #2
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trail Blazers
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    28,727
    In other words they still don't know what are the significant drivers of global climate change.

  3. #3
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    LOL...

    Analysis of the carbon-containing particles in the smoke revealed that their chemical composition may make them more effective at increasing global warming than previous thought.
    How many times have i stated that they keep finding BC is more of a driver than previously thought?

  4. #4
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    In other words they still don't know what are the significant drivers of global climate change.
    Wrong. Amazing how every person on this forum seems to discount climate science except the actual scientists.

  5. #5
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Wrong. Amazing how every person on this forum seems to discount climate science except the actual scientists.
    Too bad you follow the dogma of AGW. When you become a scientific skeptic, instead of follower of the dogma of AGW, please let us know.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •