Reply With Quote
Where would he play?
Hibbert and West are the big men starters
Unless he accepts to come off the bench
According to Hoopshype. Apparently it is expected to be announced tomorrow at some point in time.
Where would he play?
Hibbert and West are the big men starters
Unless he accepts to come off the bench
If he comes of the bench, the Pacers look scary
I agree
If Scola accepts his role as 6th man watch out for dem Pacers...gonna be fun watching the Heat/Nets/Pacers battle it out next season (lol bulls)
Honestly, I more concerned about where Granger is going to end up. Indy definitely needed a reserve big after losing Tyler and Pendergraph. To depend on Ian and a young Plumlee would be a big risk.
I don't like it. I don't like it at all. I've had 3 years of peace from that front.
Scola's nice, but what they really need is another point guard.
C.J Watson not sufficient enough for your liking?
Pacers rely on a low post game, and defense. With the break out of Paul George, they have added their needed scoring punch at the gaurd position, so Hill and Augustine are enough, Scola has a good low post game, and can shoot a J here and there. They need that in the paint scoring of the bench, spreads the floor, makes everyones life easier like everyone knows.
Oh , they landed Watson? That's going to be a really strong team next year then. DJ Augustine single-handedly cost them a trip to the Finals. He made Neal look like Jason Kidd tbh. Would have loved it if the Spurs could have gotten Watson.
Yes, it was a very quiet move this off season. Bird doing his thing quite quietly. Watson or Livingston would've been great for us in my opinion. DJ is garbage, I don't understand why they didn't pick up a vet at some point during the season as a 3rd PG.
Looks like it's Granger to Phoenix. Just wanted to get some confirmation.
Using a PF as the 6th man doesn't sound a good idea at all imho. You need the 6th man to create his own shots so that the majority of 6th men are guards and small forwards. and I believe the value of Granger is at least twice as much as the upcoming TOSB that Scola is.
I thought pacers could have used granger's perimeter play. That seemed to be their real weakness against the Heat. But they did need a big off the bench with pendergraph and psycho T bolting
Miami gonna get pounded in the paint.
Nah, their weakness was the same as the Spurs was against Miami: complete lack of a backup point guard to get them into their offense when Hill went to the bench.
Granger wont be part of it.
Pure salary dump. Gotta undo all the Lance Blanks disasters.
Baseline is right. , even Hill had trouble getting his team into sets. Watching Hill or anyone else try to dump it down into the post for a half an hour was frustrating to say the least. Although, Indy has some pretty basic sets which allows for a lot of ball pressure.
That's a nice 8 man rotation with Watson/Scola/Copeland added to the mix. If any of their young guys emerge then all of a sudden they're really deep.
Woj confirmed granger is not apart of this trade
It'll be interesting to see what Indiana can land with Granger now. I don't really see where he fits on that team with George's emergence.
Thank, Christ.
What, you think he'd do damage in a Suns uniform?
I don't want to take the chance he'd do damage in a Suns uniform. The peace has been nice the last few years. I hate to start that roiling up again. That dread, that pit in my stomach. I hate it.
Are u serious? Granger is the perfect spot up shooter for pg. Defenses sags off lance
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
