Reply With Quote
Really Chalmers? Definitely still George Hill. Chalmers sucks.
If we had to re-draft, would the FO draft Chalmers instead of having drafted Hill? Turning Hill into Leonard was nice (especially since we traded away Paul George, sigh) but would Chalmers have been better? He now has 2 rings and is a solid #1 PG who gets steals by the bunches and can hit threes in the clutch.
Really Chalmers? Definitely still George Hill. Chalmers sucks.
lol Chalmers.
Lol, Chalmers.
And like you said, the Hill draft turned into Kawhi. No way they trade that pick for Chalmers.
Chalmers doesn't net Leonard and that's really the end of it. Also, characterizing Chalmers as a solid #1 PG is generous, to say the least.
Chalmers IS the one guy the Miami big 3 yells a lot at.... Although to be fair, a lot of people thought he was the better and safer pick.
No
I wanted Chalmers at the time. Wrong again.
(No way we could have acquired Leonard for Chalmers.)
Chalmers for Hill? Yep.
Chalmers for Leonard? Not a chance.
Chalmers is an undersized SG that works well in the Heat's system. Lebron is really the PG of that team considering he leads them in assists. Chalmers without Wade and Lebron would be trash. He thrives off of the attention those two guys get from the defense and knows how to take advantage of that by getting open 3's and easy layups.
So essentially, the question is would you rather have Chalmers and George, or Hill then Kawhi.
Chalmers gets looks playing with three All NBA (two HOF) players in their primes. Put him on Utah, and maybe his option doesn't even get picked up.
Hate on Chalmers, but the guy knows how to perform in the playoffs.
Hill is obviously the more well rounded player but Hill still has a tendency to play soft and scared.
Chalmers > Hill (not factoring in the Leonard trade)
lol smh
chalmers
Same here man, I mean the guy led Kansas to a le. Supposedly, he had the skills and the moxie and is basically "proven" compared to Hill.I wanted Chalmers at the time. Wrong again.
(No way we could have acquired Leonard for Chalmers.)
Would rather have a true PG, both guys are nothing more than undersized SG's, a position which SA is stacked with.
As for who's the better player, Hill.
George Hill to Kawhi Leonard
Mario Chalmers to Kawhi Leonard? I don't think so.
Tractor Traylor to Dirk...
Bad ranking method.
You guys are always all about our system, which makes srubs to stars. Just think about this. Chalmers never played in this kind of system, while Hill pretty much enjoyed the benefits of Pop. I even think that Chalmers is a better fit. But yeah, the Leonard trade might happen if our system features Chalmers at backup PG.
They're both , honestly.
put HIll playing next to Lebron, Wade and Bosh, and put Chalmers in Indiana.
let's see how good Chalmers looks then
george hill. chalmers is a master flopper(aka ) and gets baskets due to playing with 3 guys that at times require double teams. he was good at kansas too, but his defense consists of flopping and that's really all he does. george hill is fearless. we all remember his battles with kobe when he was with the spurs. chalmers is a better shooter though.
that was more aurthor's doing in that last game than chalmers, but he did hit the 3 pointer to send it to OT. i was happy for them cuz i hate memphis.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
