Reply With Quote
Parker. As poorly as he played for most of Game 6, he came on when it mattered most and took no part in the catastrophic chokejob. He also won Game 1 for them in Miami. Manu is directly responsible for 2006 and 2013.
Simple question. Let me know what you guys think.
at the end of a game****
Parker. As poorly as he played for most of Game 6, he came on when it mattered most and took no part in the catastrophic chokejob. He also won Game 1 for them in Miami. Manu is directly responsible for 2006 and 2013.
Manu!
It's honestly hard for me to say. Tony truly is a clutch shooter, as he has demonstrated repeatedly. Manu positively has ice in his veins with any shot at the end of a game.
I guess I would have to go with Tony, simply because Manu is as likely to overestimate his own abilities (2006) as he is to make the winning shot.
But I love Manu having the ball late in a game. I have confidence in him without really having the empirical evidence to back it up. I guess I think that Manu's bball i.q. is so much higher than anyone else's…but then that leads to that bad judgment at times.
I guess I end up with Tony. Even when he has been shooting badly in a game, he comes through in clutch time. (game 6 of last year's Finals)
Both are hit or miss so im on the fence
Hmm one will either turn the ball for a turnover by forcibly passing in tight spaces, or the other one will dribble too much that we are left with no option but to hurry up shots.... hmmm.... i just don't know really!
I'm fine with both idem with Duncan
Hmmmm game winners vs missed finals free throws lmao
I'm going with Ginobili. In addition, he and Duncan were the only players that "brought it" to game 3 last night. Without Ginobili's 6 - 3 point shots, this game would have been a total blowout! Thanks Ginobili!!!
For me, it depends on who's playing better leading up to the end of game situation we're talking about. Sometimes it'll be Parker, sometimes it'll be Manu.
Parker easily. That iso 30 feet out followed by a screen from Splitter to end quarters never ing works.
fifyI'm going with Ginobili. In addition, he and Splitter were the only players that "brought it" to game 6 last year. Without Ginobili's 8 turnovers, this game would have been a total blowout! Thanks Ginobili!!!
Pop
This.
Would anyone really trust Tony more in game 3?
Parker = Hits game winnersI'm going with Ginobili. In addition, he and Splitter were the only players that "brought it" to game 6 last year. Without Ginobili's 8 turnovers, this game would have been a total blowout! Thanks Ginobili!!!
Manu = Misses clutch free throws and turns it over
fair enough. If Manu's 3ball is splashing then Manu. If Parker is getting to the rack and hitting the jumpers than Tony.
GSW game 1 West semis
Pop made all the wrong subs utions at the end of game 6. When they needed a play at the end of overtime he went with Manu instead of TP.
Manu. Hes much harder to defend than parker.
Parker just by a tiny string.
manu
Manu no doubt.
It would have been Manu since about 2006 for me, but the last two years Tony has really developed a reliable mid-range shot. Add in the additional years of craftiness and experience and now I would take either one depending on how they are playing. Even that soft answer is tough. They both have had bad 1/2s and then went into 'video game mode' a quarter later..
To do what? Offense? Defense?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
