Reply With Quote
Has to be Fisher. Scott had a cancer on his team and an edict from above to allow it to metastases.
Has it got to be Byron Scott?
I dunno a strong performances put in by Derek Fisher.
Did the Philly coach have a chance?
Has to be Fisher. Scott had a cancer on his team and an edict from above to allow it to metastases.
It's easily Hoiberg but I could see an argument for Bickerstaff or Fisher.
Not sure what kind of miracle you guys think Scott is supposed to perform coaching Kobe & co.
What, no Pop? OP, you hate Pop. I'm Shocked.
Scott took the job purely due to financial distress, that was and is obvious. That having been established, he's been paid, he would have collected the rest of this year if he was fired. He is the one who makes out the lineups. That he was too spineless to go against Laker Marketing Incs wishes is his own doing.
Scott bears responsibility. Notthe owners made me do it.
Scott bears the responsibility for what? What is the ceiling for that Lakers team? You're delusional if you think they could hit .500 with that roster never mind make the playoffs.Scott took the job purely due to financial distress, that was and is obvious. That having been established, he's been paid, he would have collected the rest of this year if he was fired. He is the one who makes out the lineups. That he was too spineless to go against Laker Marketing Incs wishes is his own doing.
Scott bears responsibility. Not
Meanwhile in Chicago...
The Lakers are currently at .205.
.400, for that matter even .350 would be a huge improvement for a real coach.
Scott bears responsibility for playing Kirby thus robbing others and destroying any chance to form a team strategy.
lebron?
it's not wrong for him to have as much power as he does tbh. the problem for him is that his organization is a joke / they don't have a pat riley.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
