I wonder which side the liberals and media are gonna side with: the muslims or the gays?
LOL s taking ownership
http://m.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/musl...?utm_referrer=
Muslim parents have threatened to gather signatures for a pe ion against a Berlin preschool, after discovering that one of its male teachers is gay. Many of the parents have removed their children from the nursery.
The protest by parents at the kindergarten in the northern district of Reinickendorf was reported by German media earlier this week.
I wonder which side the liberals and media are gonna side with: the muslims or the gays?
they wonder which side you take.
a Berlin pre-school? Probably paid for with tax dollars? Definitely the side of the gays. Now, if it's a Christian school in the US paid for by my own dollars, I'd object and if they didn't pull the teacher, I'd take my kids out - not that I'd put my kids in any pre-school or Christian school (if I could afford that, I'd rather homeschool).
Gay perhaps, but at least he's not a Jew.
Sjw's in a bind. Do they semen shield the Muslims or the gays here.
hmmm
telling
Its pretty clear to this liberal that Muslims have to respect Western values or laws if they want to live in the West. Not a fan of this nonsense where people on the left have even equated wearing the veils to some kind of feminism now. I would have to assume people like that are just extremist activists tho no matter how much people on the right might try to associate the biggest liberal re s with all of leftism or Democrats. Basically, how it goes is people will find the biggest re s on each side and try to associate the whole movement with them. Pretty annoying tbh
Muslims deserve to be treated the same as Christians. Which means accepting them as normal, everyday people.....and then once that happens, ting on them for their stupid beliefs.
Abrahamic religions love to hate gays. The descendant of Noah sure was a phobe.
Who has the popcorn?
closer to home, Christian Taliban haters block LGBTQ items from US Census, insulting Ms as non-people
Or they could just do what you do and shield both.
... Nah. I've always maintained that Muslims (or any religious background) are fine with me, but as long as they don't shove their religuous/fundamentalist views onto others.
So do I defend muzzie , generally? Yeah. Will I defend muzzies who discriminate gays because it pleases sky daddy? Absolutely not.
So are you okay with them not assimilating or these neighborhoods in Europe where the police can't even go into?
I believe in criticizing Muslims for their actions, not what we think their actions are going to be just because they share the same religion as assholes on the other side of the ocean.
Are you asking me if I'm OK with violence that makes areas unsafe even for law enforcement? No, I'm not ok with that. But I couldn't give less of a if the people being violent were muzzies, Christians, or atheists. Violence is bad.
I don't think a Muslim rapist is any worse than a Christian rapist, for instance.
What does assimilation mean to you? And those safe zones aren't really true.
Assimilation to me means becoming part of whatever society you're in - learning their language, adopting their culture, integrating into society whether at work/school. To what safe zones are you referring?
Oh look, a peaceful Muslim protest...
sounds like a typical red blooded southern conservative american family...why do they hate each other again?
I'd rather a gay pre-k teacher than whatever this is
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)