Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Post Count
    148
    Does it?

  2. #2
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Do you exist?

  3. #3
    2nd Verse Same as the 1st Oh, Gee!!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    8,869
    I don't understand the question, thread starter.

  4. #4
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    Natural law, as an abstract concept, doesn't presuppose a theology -- natural law exists because man exists, without regard to why or how it is that man exists. The overlay of natural law being willed to man by a creator comes closer to presupposing a theological underpinning. But as I've been reminded repeatedly in the discussion of intelligent design as a concept, the notion of an intelligent designer is not necessarily contiguous with a theological belief in God or religion in any form.

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    15,842
    does natural law presuppose a supernatural?

    sounds like another creationist/IDer.

  6. #6
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    does natural law presuppose a supernatural?
    No, and neither does, as FWD suggests, intelligent design.

  7. #7
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    No, and neither does, as FWD suggests, intelligent design.
    That's not what I suggested, though, 101. I was just reiterating what I have been told elsewhere.

    If someone suggests here that natural law presupposes a theology and that natural law emanates from man's creator, then I'm not sure how you can square the argument that teaching concerning man's creation is anything other than religious or theological.

  8. #8
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    That's not what I suggested, though, 101. I was just reiterating what I have been told elsewhere.

    If someone suggests here that natural law presupposes a theology and that natural law emanates from man's creator, then I'm not sure how you can square the argument that teaching concerning man's creation is anything other than religious or theological.
    There is a school of thought (think I saw it from a string-theory mathematician on NOVA), that our "creation" did not have to come from a supernatural being - but from simply a more advanced being (or as this guy suggested, HUMANS fully evolved). Not saying I give the guy alot of merit, just repeating...didn't mean to misquote you, however.

  9. #9
    Basketball Expertise spurster's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Post Count
    4,132
    If not theology, then at least metaphysics.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •