Reply With Quote
For who or what? His trade value is not very high right now.
We need someone who isn't going to warm the bench all year......
For who or what? His trade value is not very high right now.
Just think of him as a taller, more overpaid version of Steve Kerr.
It'll help you sleep at night.
But Barry is not as clutch as Kerr was.
except Kerr isn't a coward when it comes to shooting when he's open
no friggin way...ppl seem to forget how brent came through in the playoffs...when it REALLY counts. lets not sleep on him just yet. he has yet to f*ck up a playoff series for us. until he does, lets keep the "trade brent" threads down a bit.
i agree, but i dont know what team needs him except for maybe charlotte
If you want to trade Barry, be prepared to take back a bad contract. His contract isn't obscene, but it's large enough that nobody is going to want to pay him that much for his limited contributions. So to trade him, the Spurs would likely need to take back a bad contract.
No thanks.
He can be useful in the regular season, it's just of a matter of seeing if he actually will be useful.
Barry is just fine. Not perfect...but, good in his role.
I like Barry and I think he can help us but he will likely be traded soon.
We sign him as the first swingman from the bench and even to play some PG (Beno was a rookie). He was our vet shooter.
Now he is the 4th swingman, we have 2 good backup at the PG spot and we have NVE, Finley and Horry as clutch shooters.
Will Peter Holt agree to spend $10M over the next 2 years for a 4th swingman? I don't think so.
Barry will be traded, not for a better player but for a cheaper one. I think too that's Barry has some trade value : he is not that overpaid and there is a market for this kind of players. Spurs can trade him without taking back a bad contract or without giving up too much things in addition of Barry. (contrary to the two first round draft pick in the Malik trade)
Would you do this deal?
Jax
Tinsley
Harrison
Rasho Nesterovic
Brent Barry
Keep Tinsley and I'd still do it.
There's no place for Stephen Jackson here. If the Spurs didn't have Finley, then I'd do that deal.
No. no no take Tinsley....I insist!!!
Indiana Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Stephen Jackson
6-8 SG from Oak Hill Academy (HS)
15.8 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 2.3 apg in 36.3 minutes
Incoming
Beno Udrih
6-3 PG from Slovenia (Foreign)
3.1 ppg, 0.8 rpg, 1.5 apg in 6.6 minutes
Brent Barry
6-7 SG from Oregon State
5.3 ppg, 1.8 rpg, 1.3 apg in 17.1 minutes
Change in team outlook: -7.4 ppg, -1.4 rpg, and +0.5 apg.
San Antonio Trade Breakdown
Outgoing
Beno Udrih
6-3 PG from Slovenia (Foreign)
3.1 ppg, 0.8 rpg, 1.5 apg in 6.6 minutes
Brent Barry
6-7 SG from Oregon State
5.3 ppg, 1.8 rpg, 1.3 apg in 17.1 minutes
Incoming
Stephen Jackson
6-8 SG from Oak Hill Academy (HS)
15.8 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 2.3 apg in 36.3 minutes
I wouldn't take Tinsley for Sergey Karaulov straight-up....No. no no take Tinsley....I insist!!!
well maybe I might.
The pacers I'd like to have in a Spurs uni is Foster : husstle, rebounding, local boy but maybe tii luch injuries.
If Spurs goal is to save money, Barry for jackson don't make sense.
No on both counts!
Faaaaaahaaaaaak no.
dont trade barry.
hes the best clutch motha on the spurs team.
on my live 06 that is
hows this trade barry+nazr to bulls for nacioni+deng or duhorn
i'd just be down with trading barry. he's made some nice passes and shot well during one game against the suns in the playoffs (who the spurs nearly swept and that one game was the first one), but saying he hasn't messed up any series also applies to beno and rasho. i'm surprised people aren't down with bringing steven jackson back. i didn't like the guy in particular but he seems to have a more reliable shot.
I would not trade Barry. He is the comedian of the group.
We'll trade you for DeMarr Johnson. :o
are their wheelchairs included in this deal? even then, no
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
