IMHO, parents should test their own kids so we can use those tax dollars in a more productive way.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...e/3797645.html
Does it go to far? Should it go farther? Is it another ineffective offensive in the war on drugs and waste of taxpayer money?
Personally, I think it's a program that sounds great on paper but probably isn't going to change much of anything.
IMHO, parents should test their own kids so we can use those tax dollars in a more productive way.
Well, if nothing else, it's a great way to keep at-risk kids away from programs that could possibly enrich their lives.If a student is commited to the after-school activity and not posing as a threat to peers then what would be purpose be of removing them from a program that has the potential to steer them away from self-destructive activities?
It's a poor use of taxes that could be better appropriated to science and art programs that are underfunded. Sounds like they're taking action just to take action instead of finding a lasting solution.
I pretty much agree with Jekka on all of that.
I think we're moving very quickly to a slippery-slope on control of students with programs like this, although I do recognize the need to do something.
I don't remember the numbers off the top of my head, but San Marcos HS had some very high numbers for drug possession in the last police count.
I'll assume that the "Just Say No" program is not working.
When I was in high school, we used to party quite regularly with one of the biggest pot-heads/drunks I knew at the time....the D.A.R.E. president.![]()
That sounds NORML to me.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)