Of course...that's because all the terrorists are on her side.
Drudge
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX MON OCT 25, 2004 09:55:21 ET XXXXX
EDWARDS WIFE: NO RIOTS IF WE WIN
The wife of Dem vice presidential hopeful John Edwards said on Sunday there will be no riots around the election -- if Kerry/Edwards wins!
C-SPAN cameras captured spouse Elizabeth Edwards making the startling comments to a supporter during a Kerry Campaign Town Hall Meeting in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Supporter: Kerry's going to take PA.
Liz Edwards: I know that.
Supporter: I'm just worried there's going to be riots afterwards.
Liz Edwards: Uh.....well...not if we win.
DRUDGE presents an audio clip of the exchange.
Of course...that's because all the terrorists are on her side.
I'm a Bush supporter but this petty BS is why so many Americans hate elections.
This is all the right has is petty BS. Forget issues.
If it makes us forget about 380 tons of explosives and 49 dead, unarmed Iraqi trainiees, so much the better.
LOL never mind that it's a direct quote with audio link.
Oh and a big huge just for the benefit of Ididnotknowthat.
That's cause the only way W can win is by stealing the election at this point.
It's called a war. People die in them. happens.
Besides we know you're happy about it.
you, Hootie.
I'm pissed about it -- and all you can come up with is this drivel.
Stick your sound bite up your ass.
Talk about petty BS !
Ok my bad, then you are just ignorant of what happenens in wars.
Besides...Kerry should be happy, the PCT of American Soldiers dying in this war is going down.
We lose 380 tons of explosives and leave our allies unarmed as a matter of course?Ok my bad, then you are just ignorant of what happenens in wars.
Bull .
You must really hate America to think we suck that bad.
I agree. We should be talking about the President's shoes, the Vice President's flu shot, and who Ms. O'Leary's 4th Grade History class picked to win the Election.This is all the right has is petty BS. Forget issues.
Dumbass, it's a war, if we had the entire country secured it wouldn't be a war now would it?
Look you handwringers need to shut the up...we'd have never won a single war with the at ude that you have.
And don't use this to justify your ing, you were ing before this happened.
And as for leaving those soldiers unarmed, I don't know the protocols involved but since it's a fact that the some of those Iraqis are actually part of the insurgency, I don't think we should be giving them weapons to go rearm the insurgents at night.
Spurminator...you are fair and balanced.
You ing idiot. We knew EXACTLY where these explosives were. They chose not to safeguard them. This is imcompetence, plain and simple -- especially since the explosives can be used to trigger a nuclear bomb.Dumbass, it's a war, if we had the entire country secured it wouldn't be a war now would it?
You're " happens" mentality just helps the terrorists. Good job.How about an armed escort for their bus? Is that too much to ask? Maybe they just should've painted a bullseye on the side of it.And as for leaving those soldiers unarmed, I don't know the protocols involved but since it's a fact that the some of those Iraqis are actually part of the insurgency, I don't think we should be giving them weapons to go rearm the insurgents at night.
No idiot...we might have known where those weapons were but we did not have that area under control.
You're ing stupid. We also know where the cities where the terrorists are located, does that mean we have them under control?
you , this is an illegal unjust war for Oil, how dare you claim there is a legitimate danger.especially since the explosives can be used to trigger a nuclear bomb.
How dare you ing claim there were any WMD materials in Iraq.
Is it to much to ask you to shut the up?You're " happens" mentality just helps the terrorists. Good job.How about an armed escort for their bus? Is that too much to ask?
It's a war. People die in wars. I am not minimizing it...I am just counterbalancing your highly over-reactive kneejerking.
There is no such thing as a smooth war.
And we both know you are full of ...You act like there are terms underwhich you would be positive in this war, and there aren't...you will and complain over every thing you can because it fits your agenda.
Nothiong wrong with that but please don't act like there is something that could realistically happen at this point that would make you not about this war.
I admit my ing bias...admit yours. Don't be a Kerry.
Before the invasion...
No, they got there as quick as they could...
Again, no, it falls under the category of " happens in a war."
Your doom and gloom posture is doing them more good that our realizing that no war is perfect.
I think that would be in order, however, you should first seek to learn whether the new Iraq government or the coalition had accepted responsibility for safe passage of trainees before you start blaming Bush. I know, I know, it's reflex...but, really, wouldn't it be fair to know?
Oh, and you bring so much to the conversations in this forum.I agree. We should be talking about the President's shoes, the Vice President's flu shot, and who Ms. O'Leary's 4th Grade History class picked to win the Election.
![]()
Whatsa matta Dan? TRUTH HURT?![]()
What? Today? The weapons were still being pilfered as of yesterday.No, they got there as quick as they could...
lol. Convenient of you to add "materials" there. As it is -- we knew where they were before the invasion. Now we don't -- which is better?you , this is an illegal unjust war for Oil, how dare you claim there is a legitimate danger.
How dare you ing claim there were any WMD materials in Iraq.Yes, it is. You can't censor me so kindly yourself.Is it to much to ask you to shut the up?Of course you are. Don't flop now that you've flipped.I am not minimizing it.I am negative about this development. I'd be very pleased to know we are doing everything to protect the Iraqis we claim we will be to be turning the country over too sometime in the future.And we both know you are full of ...You act like there are terms underwhich you would be positive in this war, and there aren't...you will and complain over every thing you can because it fits your agenda.I am quite resigned to the fact we are there and will be there for a long time.Nothiong wrong with that but please don't act like there is something that could realistically happen at this point that would make you not about this war.
I just want to quit ing up over there.
No war is perfect, but between this -up, Gitmo and Abu Gharib, the U.S. has become it's own worst enemy. The only thing I can figure is that W is intent on us losing this war despite our brave troops best efforts.Your doom and gloom posture is doing them more good that our realizing that no war is perfect.
Before we chased off the inspectors who had kept tabs on them, yes.Before the invasion...Link?No, they got there as quick as they could...380 TONS? that. Are you not concerned where they are? Who has them? We used to know.Your doom and gloom posture is doing them more good that our realizing that no war is perfect.Didn't do that. RIF.think that would be in order, however, you should first seek to learn whether the new Iraq government or the coalition had accepted responsibility for safe passage of trainees before you start blaming Bush.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)