...and wagged his finger this hard, he was lying to the entire country. Something about not having sexual relations with a chubby, pizza-eatin', intern or something.
Click Image to view video at YouTube
Yoni's boy dubya is gettin beat to on every front, so Yoni's gotta go back 10 years and drag out Clinton.
Won't work, Yoni, dubya's in the blinding limelight now, not because the Dem's are witchhunting dubya, but because dubya is one stupid, ignorant, murdering mother er surrounded by similar assholes who couldn't find their wives asses in the middle of the day.
Last edited by boutons_; 09-23-2006 at 11:04 AM.
Uh, this was taped Sunday.
stupid and ignorant? yet, you always claim he rules everything in the world and concocts crazy conspiracies, rules world oil production, etc...
ooo burn.
well, the least I can say is, there is a time and a place for everything, and peace is not what I consider appeasing people. etc, etc, etc.
So basically,
Bill Clinton searched for Bin Laden, and "terrorism" was on his agenda,
but...
Bush, from the time he took office to September 11, 2001, NEVER had even one meeting on Bin Laden or terrorism at all, and cut terrorism funding.
And Bin Laden just isn't important to him anymore nowadays either.
Great thread
"you always claim he rules everything in the world and concocts crazy conspiracies, rules world oil production,"
link please.
dubya is an ignorant, befuddled puppet with wood for a brain, manipulated by Rove, head, and his corporate owners. dubya is an ineffective wimp who plays, badly, a macho, jock dumb .
link please...dubya is an ignorant, befuddled puppet with wood for a brain, manipulated by Rove, head, and his corporate owners. dubya is an ineffective wimp who plays, badly, a macho, jock dumb .
"link please..."
been watching much TV these last 10 years?
Apparently not the networks received by tin foil hats.
Look, Clinton and Bush have one thing in common.
Clinton wouldn't own up to having sex with that woman, when we all know he did.
Bush won't own up to being a mass murderer, when we all know he is.
Our job is to consider which act is more hideous.
Kenny! What's the frequency?
Hey, guys, look, I know it's hard to accept. He tried to make up for his absence of 9/11 by going into Afghanistan. We all agreed, stood behind him, and joined together as a nation. Then he went and did the unthinkable. Now his actions have resulted in similar actions committed by bin ladan himself. Murder without just cause is something these 2 enemies share. Bush left us now choice but to go back and examine his character, and what was found is disturbing. How can any christain be an accomplace to murder committed by either one of these killers?
Huh? Clinton searched for Bin Laden and terrorism was on his agenda.So basically,
Bill Clinton searched for Bin Laden, and "terrorism" was on his agenda,
but...
Bush, from the time he took office to September 11, 2001, NEVER had even one meeting on Bin Laden or terrorism at all, and cut terrorism funding.
And Bin Laden just isn't important to him anymore nowadays either.
Great thread
Bin Laden was offered to him on a silver platter several times and the
CIA had him in their sights once and couldn't get the go ahead from
Mr. Clinton. He was busy coaching an intern more than likely.
You need to remember all the facts, not just the ones you have been
coached on.
Or the ones you make up, "most lkely."
wowsers.I always thought you were a web bot, but now I KNOW you're only a badly tempered sixth grader.
Of course the blowjob is more hideous.
anyone who gives clinton for getting a bj should be doused in cambodian bukkake then feathered
I think the guys at Powerline hit this nail on the head:
The fruits of an unserious presidency
Bill Clinton is desperate to be remembered by history for something other than the Lewinsky affair, perjury, and impeachment. And he will be. It's becoming clear that the Clinton legacy will also include eight years of inaction, broken by rare instances of ineffectual action, towards the mounting threat posed by Osama bin Laden and other Islamic terrorists that culminated in 9/11.
That this prospect horrifies Clinton is evident from the rough transcript of the former president's interview with Chris Wallace. Clinton has no defense for his feckless response to the mounting terrorist threat other than the honest and very limited defense that he just didn't imagine these guys could successfully attack us on large-scale at home. Clearly that defense won't do, so instead he lashes out at Wallace, Fox News, ABC, and the "right-wing." Somehow, I don't think history will be very impressed with this sort of flailing, or with all of the meaningless inside baseball Clinton tosses around (e.g., "the CIA was run by George Tenet who President Bush gave the medal of freedom to and said he did a good job").
Nor will the fact that President Bush was slow off the mark help Clinton. First, failures by one administration do not excuse failures by another (although they would help support the honest defense that Clinton is unwilling to make -- that it was difficult to comprehend the true extent of the threat). Second, Bush was in a position to create a post-9/11 legacy of fighting terrorism and he'll be remembered for that legacy. Clinton's effort to pull Bush down with him is a fool's errand.
The inescapable fact is that Bill Clinton, for all of his strengths, gave the country an unserious presidency, and it turned out (not surprisingly) that we needed more. Clinton savored the popularity that came with that presidency, but now he must live with its unfortunate and unflattering legacy.
dubya, object of ridicule world-wide, is a "serious" person?
dubya/Repug adminstration has been profoundly characterized by total inaction, lack of goverance, lack of policies other than cut taxes and protect the super-rich and corps, and above all destroyed by the humongous strategic "action" of the Iraq war.
How 'bout if we give him for lying under oath, asking others to do so, and obstructing justice in an attempt to deny due process (something afforded us in the cons ution he had sworn to defend as President) to a citizen who had filed suit against him. How 'bout then?
Hilarious that Bush's digital pimp is bashing someone else for denying due process. Hint: when they release the Book of Presidents, Clinton's pic won't be under the "He Denied Due Process!!" caption.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
