Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    2,247
    I just read an article on Chris Andersen who's serving a 2-year expulsion from the NBA for drug abuse.. he's admited his mistake and cleaned up his act.. he's keeping in shape and looks forward to returning to the league.. basically a good kid and he's from Texas as well .. I always liked his energy and enthusiasm for the game..he would fire up the crowd and provide a much needed spark ala Manu.. athletic, can really jump and run the floor and he's even working on his jumpshot.. I'd be willing to gamble on him as a Spur for the future.

  2. #2
    Since 1992 Brutalis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    11,002
    Forget it. Won't happen.

  3. #3
    Fantasy Football Guru Guru of Nothing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    7,583
    Suddenly my seventh round pick in the ST keeper league draft tomorrow is in jeopardy.

    Damn you!!

  4. #4
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    726
    A white guy who can jump out of the gym, looks EXTREMELY puffy on closeup vids, and is busted out for substance abuse. Only one thing comes to my mind: steroids. No thanks. He'll be watched VERY closely when he attempts his comeback, and with no 'roids? No enhanced jumping ability. That's really his only weapon.

  5. #5
    Fantasy Football Guru Guru of Nothing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    7,583
    I don't think Anderson was booted out of basketball for 2 years for a steriod first offense charge ... just my gut feeling.

    Missing 5,845 uncontested lay-ups in a row is more telling.

  6. #6
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    726
    I don't think Anderson was booted out of basketball for 2 years for a steriod first offense charge ... just my gut feeling.

    Missing 5,845 uncontested lay-ups in a row is more telling.
    You don't get booted for two years for a first offense of ANY substance. You also don't get puffy and bloated by using for a short time.

  7. #7
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    You don't get booted for two years for a first offense of ANY substance. You also don't get puffy and bloated by using for a short time.
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2308918

    NEW YORK -- New Orleans Hornets forward Chris Andersen was dismissed and disqualified from the NBA on Friday for violating the league's drug policy.

    Gregory Shamus/NBAE via Getty Images
    The "Birdman" is the first NBA player banned for drug violations since Stanley Roberts in 1999.

    Andersen must wait two years before he can apply for reinstatement, the league said.

    According to the league's collective bargaining agreement, a player can only be disqualified for a fourth positive test for performance-enhancing drugs, or a first positive test for "drugs of abuse."

    The drugs on that list are amphetamine and its analogs, which include methamphetamine; cocaine; LSD; opiates, including heroin, codeine and morphine; and PCP.

    Andersen has not previously been suspended for steroid use.
    Last edited by Solid D; 10-21-2006 at 11:56 PM.

  8. #8
    I come in Marklar. Marklar MM's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    6,214
    Birdman put them ninjas in a trashcan. Leave em outside of your door, I'm your trashman.

  9. #9
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    726
    Andersen has not previously been suspended for steroid use.
    I'm surprised at you Solid. Your takes are usually pretty bullet proof. Nowhere does it say that he must be suspended for previous positive tests of performance enhancing drugs, just that they must happen.

  10. #10
    San Antonio, I'll be there in 2008! SpursWillOwn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    612
    birdman=chris anderson?
    wtf he sucks i used to think that birdman was larry bird

  11. #11
    I come in Marklar. Marklar MM's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    6,214
    birdman=chris anderson?
    wtf he sucks i used to think that birdman was larry bird
    Yes. "His swooping dunks, shot-blocking skills and rare athleticism for his size", earned him "The Birdman".

  12. #12
    Feels bad man Mr.Bottomtooth's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    16,539

  13. #13
    Fantasy Football Guru Guru of Nothing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    7,583
    You don't get booted for two years for a first offense of ANY substance.
    Is that your final answer?

  14. #14
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    You don't get booted for two years for a first offense of ANY substance. You also don't get puffy and bloated by using for a short time.
    According to the league's collective bargaining agreement, a player can only be disqualified for a fourth positive test for performance-enhancing drugs, or a first positive test for "drugs of abuse."

    The drugs on that list are amphetamine and its analogs, which include methamphetamine; cocaine; LSD; opiates, including heroin, codeine and morphine; and PCP.
    "ANY substance" includes "drugs of abuse" according to the NBA CBA.

  15. #15
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    2,247
    A white guy who can jump out of the gym, looks EXTREMELY puffy on closeup vids, and is busted out for substance abuse. Only one thing comes to my mind: steroids. No thanks. He'll be watched VERY closely when he attempts his comeback, and with no 'roids? No enhanced jumping ability. That's really his only weapon.
    From what I read, he tried reinventing himself to get stronger in the post by putting on more weight but this only led to injuries, frustration and drug abuse.. he should have stuck with waht got him into the NBA in the first place.. rebounding, defense and athleticism.. I really think his energy is something the Spurs would benefit from.. he has the speed and size and atleticism and agility to thrive in a small ball game.. who knows, could give Dirk something to worry about.. shouldn't be that expensive to acquire either.

  16. #16
    GAME OVER gospursgojas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    5,579
    Remember back in the 05 dunk contest when he had about 15 attempts at a easy dunk. I mean so did Nate Robinson but hes 5'8 and Andersen is like 6 10

  17. #17
    Old School Toronto
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    905
    Andersen sucks but you guys have a few things wrong here.....

    1. steroids hardly increase your jumping ability
    2. you don't need to be a long term user to be bloated, 2 weeks of pumping testosterone will bloat anyone
    3. it was never actually released what drug he was using/abusing

  18. #18
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    726
    1. steroids hardly increase your jumping ability
    Thank you. Now go sit in the back of the class. Steroids increase strength. Increased strength leads to increases in all atheltic abilities: speed, vertical, quickness...the list goes on. No, they never said he used steroids, or anything else for that matter. They can't because of confidentiality agreements with the players association.

  19. #19
    Fantasy Football Guru Guru of Nothing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    7,583
    Steroids increase strength.
    Is that your final answer?

  20. #20
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    Umm.. Chris Andersen wasn't kicked out for steroids. SPED= Steroids and performance enhancing drugs. If he was, then that would have been his third violation and a one year suspension. And we would have known of prior violations because he would have been suspended for those.

    (A) For the first such violation, the player shall be suspended for ten (10) games and required to enter the SPED Program;

    (B) For the second such violation, the player shall be suspended for twenty-five (25) games and, if the player is not then subject to in-patient or aftercare treatment in the SPED Program, be required to enter the SPED Program;

    (C) for the third such violation, the player shall be suspended for one (1) year from the date of such violation and, if the player is not then subject to in-patient or aftercare treatment in the SPED Program, be required to enter the SPED Program; and

    (D) for the fourth such violation, the player shall be immediately dismissed and disqualified from any association with the NBA or any of its Teams in accordance with the provisions of Section 11(a) below. ...

    He was kicked out for Drugs of Abuse as Solid D said.

  21. #21
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    Here's the info on Drugs of Abuse. First offense and you are kicked out. You can apply for reinstatement in 2 years, which is exactly his situation.


    In the event that a Veteran Player tests positive for a Drug of Abuse pursuant to this Section 6, he shall immediately be dismissed and disqualified from any association with the NBA or any of its Teams in accordance with the provisions of Section 11(a) below

    Section 11. Dismissal and Disqualification.
    (a) A player who, under the terms of this Agreement, is “dismissed and disqualified from any association with the NBA or any of its Teams in accordance with the provisions of Section 11(a)” shall, without exception, immediately be so dismissed and disqualified for a period of not less than two (2) years, and such player’s Player Contract shall be rendered null and void and of no further force or effect (subject to the provisions of paragraph 8 of the Uniform Player Contract). Such dismissal and disqualification shall be mandatory and may not be rescinded or reduced by the player’s Team or the NBA.

  22. #22
    Spurs 4 Life joeyjfive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    479
    Theres a lot of upside to this guy, with his athleticism and all but when it comes down to it. The man has a drug problem

  23. #23
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,470
    Dude's 28. not much upside left. He's still an ok player.

  24. #24
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    The interview in SI makes it abundantly clear that the issue wasn't performance-enhancers. If you think he was suspended for performance-enhancing drugs, even Chris Andersen disagrees with you.

    The SI piece on Andersen says that he encountered a lot of personal issues during the summer of 2005 (the end of a relationship with a long-term girlfriend, an issue with his mother, the destruction of his home in New Orleans by Katrina) and that he showed up to camp overweight. He said the added weight caused him to underperform, which led him to drink. In drinking, he "moved beyond alcohol," but won't say which drug he used other than to say that "all the [excess] weight went away." L. Jon Wertheim, Flightless Bird, Sports Illustrated, 10/23/06.

    I can't say it for fact, but I'm fairly certain that all of the drug problems of the late 70's and early 80's -- look up Micheal Ray Richardson if you want an example -- as well as the Len Bias situation in 1986 gave rise to a no-tolerance policy for drugs of abuse like cocaine. For a league that faced those demons head-on for the better part of a decade and a half, it's understandable that the league would be much,much harsher on those who are caught using those drugs than on performance-enhancers; there's never been much proof or even suggestion of steroid or other performance-enhancer use by NBA players.

    Andersen's use was disclosed by the random testing that each player undergoes and, to his credit, he's apparently never tried to suggest that the test was wrong. It sounds like he's gotten his life in order, which is a great thing even if he never plays another second in the NBA.

  25. #25
    Ruffy RuffnReadyOzStyle's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    24,209
    According to the league's collective bargaining agreement, a player can only be disqualified for a fourth positive test for performance-enhancing drugs, or a first positive test for "drugs of abuse."

    The drugs on that list are amphetamine and its analogs, which include methamphetamine; cocaine; LSD; opiates, including heroin, codeine and morphine; and PCP.
    Something here strikes me as a bit fishy. Isn't it odd that you are only suspended on your 4th positive test for performance enhancers - that is drugs that allow you to cheat - but if you make a mistake with a drug of abuse you are gone first time!? Shouldn't it be the other way around, or like 2nd time for both?

    That is all outta wack! One class of drugs allows you to be a cheat and a fraud and gain unfair advantage (and shrivel your testicles, give you 'roid rage, etc.), and the other is illegal but generally detracts from your performance (you are not cheating or a fraud but do have a drug problem), and yet the former is seen as 1/4 as serious as the latter!?!? Regardless of the history behind the policy, I think this is a ridiculous double standard.

    BTW, I know why this is. People see roids as "less harmful" than "drugs of abuse", however this is a false double standard. 'Roids have serious health effects and ARE ILLEGAL outside prescribed medical use! Yet another case of PR being more important than truth.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •