Reply With Quote
Is a real stud, and tough as nails. Without him, Hornets would probably be way under .500 for the season.
currently averaging
20.8 points
4.2 rebounds
10.6 assists
on 52% shooting
in leading the Hornets to a 4-1 start to the season and he is only in his 2nd season
Is a real stud, and tough as nails. Without him, Hornets would probably be way under .500 for the season.
CP3 is the ing man. If he isnt considered already to be the PG in the game, then next year he will.
I will never, ever forget the triple-double he put on the Pistons last year. I just watched in silence because I knew I was watching greatness.
As much of a badass Chris Paul is...
Parker>>>>>>>>>>>>>Paul
I am winning assists in Fantasy by a landslide thanks to him. He's a stud.
no ing way. Paul is more productive than Parker, and he doesnt have arguably the greatest PF of all time opening lanes for him.
if Parker and Paul switched teams, New Orleans would be 1-4 right now and headed to a 20 win season....and the Spurs would be well on their way to a 70+ win season.
Parker is not even on Paul's level.
Chris Paul is a young phenom, mature beyond his year. A bad actor, yes...but a great point guard.
Agreed. Paul has been in the lottery while Parker has not. Parker also has 2 rings and literally carried yall while Duncan was injured most of last year. Fact remains Parker is the 3rd best pg in the league behind Nash and Billups.
Yes ing way. Stop hating the Spurs for a second and give Parker his ing due. The kid has come a long way from a late 1st round pick to one of the best pgs in the league today. While I do agree Duncan helps out alot, Parker is ing talented and is having his best season yet at the age of 24.
I'll give Parker his due, but I'm not going to make a ridiculous statement saying he's better than Paul. Paul is probably the 2nd best PG in the league right now, Parker is maybe top 5, and that could be a stretch.
Stop sucking Chris "I havent won anything" Pauls . Parker has proven much more then Paul has. When Paul actually makes the playoffs and does something in the postseason come back and talk to me. Lets already say Dwight Howard is better then Duncan or Lebron is better then Wade or Kobe even though they havent won . And dont even put Paul over Billups. God he is getting his sucked way too much around here it is sickening.
CP3 is the best young PASS FIRST pg
By you making a parallel between Howard v. Duncan and Paul v. Parker truly shows how ing stupid you are. Howard will never be as good as Duncan has been, and Paul is already better than Parker, and Parker is in the prime of his career and Paul isn't. When Paul gets to play for a coach like Popavich or Larry Brown with players that have surrounded Billups and Parker, then run your mouth. Until then I'd quit slurping players like Billups and Parker, who are very good players, for being fortunate enough to play with great players for a great coach. By your logic Bowen is better than LeBron because he has the hardware.
I don't give a if y'all say Chris Paul is better than Tony. Paul can dish it better, but there's no one who can drive in like TPark.
Except Chris Paul.
that reply alone shows how much of a ing re you are you stupid piece of horse . Paul is only in his second ing year you dip . Parker has had the greatest PF of all time carrying his ass year after year. Parker finally had a good year last year, but he did not carry the Spurs. without Duncan in there, the Spurs would have been probably a 7th or 8th seed. last i checked, it wasnt Parker who was able to carry the Spurs to 7 games against the Mavs, it was Duncan's incredible dominance, while Parker was very quiet for the series. without Tim Duncan, Tony Parker is just an above-average PG, only because of his incredible speed. if it werent for his speed, hes definitely below average.
agreed, 100%.
how many PG's have Tim Duncan drawing triple teams and opening lanes for them? swap Paul and Parker, and the Spurs win 4 or 5 straight les.
He's a man among boys. Put Paul where Nash is now, and he'd probably avg 20 assists a game.
Not only has Parker benefited from Duncan, but he also has been surrounded by probably the best 3 pointing shooting team in the league for past few years. When you have one the best post players (if not the best) in the league in addition to a roster full of sharpshooters you are going to have open lanes and assists galore. Parker is a perfect fit in San Antonio and is a terrific player, but he's not Chris Paul. I wonder how many wins the Hornets would have had last year with Parker running the show? Not many.
Really?
How do you figure that? Come on, that's kooky talk.
Alright, I might've stretched it a little bit, but there's no denying he would do just as good a job as Nash, if not better.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
