Reply With Quote
great GREAT pickup for the nuggets but they just can't get the win, ugh
Holy sh....
great GREAT pickup for the nuggets but they just can't get the win, ugh
Who cares? Skiles got 30. Come back to me when he is within an earshot of that...
And guess who won?
doesn't matter if they lose does it...
Yes, but Blake is surprise; Skiles was already an established PG, you bagWho cares? Skiles got 30. Come back to me when he is within an earshot of that...
here is hoping to GK getting fired shortly
He makes the most boneheaded decisions in the 4th qtr. The Nuggets would have 10+ more wins this season if he knew what he was doiing late in the game.
JR exploded last game in the 3rd and 4th qtr, which put the game away. So what does Gk do this time?
Let JR sit for the last few minutes of the 4th when it was close and brings him back with 40 secs left and the Nuggs down 5
Anyway, i hope he gets fired and they bring in Adelman
oh, the Nuggets have the Spurs/Jazz/Mavs all next week
Ai will be back but it will be a real test to see if the Nuggets can get it together with a healthy team (finally)
With that logic, shouldn't Tony Parker have a couple 30 assist games under his belt?
Umm...please don't compare TP to Skiles you donkey ; Skiles was a great passer ; call me when TP has 18 assistsWith that logic, shouldn't Tony Parker have a couple 30 assist games under his belt?
call me when Scott Skiles was a 2 time all star.
Not his fault ; when Skiles was playing, there were a lot of great PG's ; TP wouldn't have been an all-star back then
With that logic, shouldn't Tony Parker have a couple 30 assist games under his belt?
I think he jsut meant that it was more surprising to him being that Blake is basically a nobody. Nothing about more experienced players dishing out thirty because they are more experienced...
Thank you ; finally a smart guy
18 ASTs is ALWAYS an accomplishment, congrats.
His team helpfully shot 51%, but took 20 less shots than the opponent and got murdered on the boards.
Did I use the wrong smiley? Can't you guys smell sarcasm when it bites you in the b-hind? Or does it have to be spelled out...
And I thought I was bitter last night... lol
Yeah, no . I mean, Skiles averaged 6.5 assists per game for his career!! Tony's at 5.4!! That's a difference of ONE ASSIST PER GAME!
No comparison. Can you imagine if Skiles was on this team? We'd be scoring one more basket per game! (If you disregard Parker's scoring advantage.)
Scott Skiles. We should create a Hall of Fame of Bad Anti-Parker takes.
Yeah, no . I mean, Skiles averaged 6.5 assists per game for his career!! Tony's at 5.4!! That's a difference of ONE ASSIST PER GAME!
No comparison. Can you imagine if Skiles was on this team? We'd be scoring one more basket per game! (If you disregard Parker's scoring advantage.)
Hey Spermy, take a look a Skiles averages from 1991 to 1995
Scott Skiles. We should create a Hall of Fame of Bad Anti-Parker takes.
Hey Spermy, take a look a Skiles averages from 1991 to 1995 :
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...skilesc01.html
Hey Lefty, take a look at league scoring averages for those years. While you're at it, check out the league APG average. Any conclusions you can draw from that?
And this is without even discussing the way the Spurs run their offense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
