Reply With Quote
are they all white women?
god damn, they must have had some wimpy ass husbands if they had to get a student to them properly!
Interesting find...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/pr...TICLE_ID=53859
are they all white women?
god damn, they must have had some wimpy ass husbands if they had to get a student to them properly!
some of them are cute but some are not.
no black females? why are the white chicks so ty?
Stephanie Giambelluca, 24: First-year teacher at J.D. Meisler Middle School in Metairie, La., was arrested in December 2006 on charges of molestation and indecent behavior with a 12-year-old male. Police say the acts were captured on videotape, recorded by Ryan Mapes, 18, who was babysitting the boy. Giambelluca allegedly disrobed to her underwear, performed a suggestive dance for the boy and performed oral sex on Mapes in front of the young student.
Why?!?!?
Scary.
You're pretty damned lazy if you didn't even click on the first name.
oh, sorry
i didnt know you could click the names
i was just looking at the pictures posted on the page then reading on those ones.
Teresa Engelbach, 21: Subs ute teacher from Pevely, Mo., was charged March 16, 2007, with having sex with a 14-year-old male student, whom she reportedly knew for years as a friend of her brother. Jefferson County authorities charged her with three counts of statutory rape and one count of statutory sodomy for incidents allegedly occurring between Feb. 1 and March 13, 2007.
Statutory sodomy???
guess that means she put a finger in his butt.
Teresa Engelbach, 21: Subs ute teacher from Pevely, Mo., was charged March 16, 2007, with having sex with a 14-year-old male student, whom she reportedly knew for years as a friend of her brother. Jefferson County authorities charged her with three counts of statutory rape and one count of statutory sodomy for incidents allegedly occurring between Feb. 1 and March 13, 2007.
Statutory sodomy???
or maybe she gave him a rim job.
The meaning is clear. The only question is whether she was giving, or taking.
Statutory Sodomy - Any act involving the genitals of one person and the mouth, tongue, or anus of another person or a sexual act involving the penetration, however slight, of the male or female sex organ or the anus by a finger, instrument or object done for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person under the age of 14.
A few words of warning here. Firstly, this supposed "journalism" has no author which makes me su ious.
Secondly, look at the number of entries where the word "allegedly" is used - in other words, nothing proven, don't mean except slander. All "allegedly" entries should be removed as those people have not been convicted of anything - how do you know the "allegations" weren't made by a vindictive student? I'd estimate (after reading about half) that less than half of the entries included someone who had been convicted or pleaded guilty.
This is some really dangerous muckraking for many of the people on here, and I think it is chicken "journalism" to name people who have not been convicted of in an authorless article.
Overall, I am highly su ious of this as a source.
Apart from those objections, some strange-looking people on there, and even a few hotties. Also, I was wondering about the direction of the "sodomy" which is mentioned in quite a few articles.
My first reaction is to ask: "Where are the victims?" But then I saw some of those pics. Wow, who let the dogs out? Someone call Micheal Vick.
Then you have the women who get it on with special needs kids... their needs aren't that special, I can assure you. That's messed up. However, some of those es are good looking, and those boys probably had the time of their life.
I missed out.
By this definition, sodomy doesn't have to involve the anus. WTF?
It's just like the news...nothing proven. No guilt or innocence. Just interesting.
It was never limited to strictly anal.
'Twas always anything other than coital.
Actually, no, you miss my point. It is not interesting if you happen to be one of those who has been placed on the list of "woman predators on campus" when nothing has been proven against you in a court of law. Put yourself in the shoes of one of these "allegedlies" - a student hates you and makes an allegation, later dismissed, but forever your name and photo are in an internet article associating you with convicted kiddy fiddlers.
That is not just "interesting", it's terrible "journalism" (it's rumour-mongering and gossip, not journalism), and it could damage reputations for life.
I have no objection to listing those who have been convicted or pleaded guilty, or even charged, but the rest of those people are being slandered and I hope they sue the out of "Worldnetdaily".
I am not criticising you for posting it here, I am criticising the publisher and author, and reminding those who read it that it's not all "fact".
Okay, I'd always associated it with the Biblical context, sodomites and all that. Interesting. Cheers.
It's WorldNetDaily.
Don't you dare associate what I do with that rag.
Ehhhhhh, good try, but the joke doesn't quite make it. None of what I said referred to what you do with WorldNetDaily, although I see what you were trying.
Wipe your arse with it? Would that count as alleged sodomy of WorldNetDaily?
People often object to my pointing things like shoddy journalism out, and I don't get it. I'm not trying to tell anyone what to think, I'm pointing out the weaknesses in a piece of media that some people will take at face value.
If that's a crime then shoot me.
Strap on. duh.
That was my first thought.Strap on. duh.
Amy Gail Lilley, 36: Inverness, Fla., woman and softball coach at Lecanto High School charged with a lesbian relationship with a 15-year-old girl. She received no prison time, being sentenced in January 2006 to two years of house arrest and eight more years of probation.
----------------
Ya think? Could have knocked me over with a feather.
I wrestled with pointing it out, because of the tragic nature of the subject ... but then Ruff & Blaze already changed the direction of the thread, so I went with it.
You never know. Several of the pictures left me completely stunned when I read that their alleged victim was a boy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
