the ?
I don't know about men, but babies would be pretty pissed...
i wont date a girl unless she has breasts
boobs are cool.
We'd still like them, but would ask them to stand on their heads so we can focus more on their asses without hurting our necks.
Outstanding.
They should have three. Two on the back and one in the middle
of their chest. That is what I would pass a law for. Barney might
object. You conservatives figure it out for yourselves.
And what the is up with the recent spate of philosophical questions from the ducks?
The sticky icky?
He's trying to figure out what to do until Leopard comes out.
, nah I figure ducks stoned would write prose like William F. Buckley.
I don't know, I'm thinking a more critical thinking Hunter S. Thompson.
If women didn't have breasts, their vaginas would have to be extremely spectacular to make up for it.
I mean, pornstar quality to the 20th degree.
An open faced roast beef sammich is an open faced roast beef sammich.
As long as they still have nice asses and no penis then it's all good.
wow. that's tough. i guess i'd put up with them, but not as much as i would if they can a nice set of cans.
Not really.
An open faced roast beef sammich with all the fixins aint the same as a simple opend faced roast beef sammich.
It would definitely be a requirement.
yeah, but they won't be able to do this
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/imag...ine=1190179763
<-------------------------
I certainly hope no breast cancer survivors with double mastectomies open this thread.
You guys keep talking about whether or not you would put up with us if we didn't have boobs!?!?!?! You "guys" are damned lucky we put up with you at all !!!!!
But keep talking smack, it's pretty funny.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)