Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    Silence surpasses speech. duncan228's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,693
    This is getting uglier by the minute.

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...onics25m0.html

    Blame flies as city sues Sonics
    By Jim Brunner


    Team owner Clay Bennett wants out of the KeyArena lease and has requested arbitration.

    The lawsuit filed by the city of Seattle on Monday is a key moment in an increasingly hostile relationship between Sonics owners and city leaders.
    February 1994: Seattle leaders agree to renovate the old Seattle Coliseum to meet the demands of the Sonics. In exchange for the city issuing 20-year bonds to pay for the $100 million renovation, the Sonics agree to a 15-year lease.

    July 2006: Clay Bennett leads a group of Oklahoma City-based businessmen to buy the Sonics and Storm for $350 million from Starbucks Chairman Howard Schultz's local ownership group. He pledges a "good faith" effort to keep the teams in Seattle.

    November 2006: Seattle voters overwhelmingly approve an initiative hostile to the Sonics, which severely restricts any city tax subsidies for professional sports teams.

    April 2007: State Legislature rejects Sonics' proposal to build a $500 million arena in Renton, paid for mostly with an extension of taxes currently paying off Safeco and Qwest fields. In response, Bennett threatens to relocate Sonics and Storm after next season.

    August 2007: Sonics part-owner Aubrey McClendon confirms the su ions of many Sonics fans when he tells an Oklahoma newspaper "we didn't buy the team to keep it in Seattle; we hoped to come here." The NBA later announces it will fine McClendon $250,000 for the remark.

    Sept. 10: Seattle City Council votes 8-0 to strictly enforce the Sonics' KeyArena lease, rejecting any early buyout.

    Sept. 13: Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels enlists former U.S. Sen. Slade Gorton to help enforce the KeyArena lease. Deputy Mayor Tim Ceis says the city is "lawyering up" and is ready to spend $1 million on legal fees.

    Sept. 21:Sonics owners file for arbitration on KeyArena, seeking approval to pay a cash settlement instead of playing out the final two years on the team's lease.

    Sept. 24: Seattle files lawsuit seeking to block the Sonics' arbitration move and hold the Sonics to the KeyArena lease through 2010.
    Seattle officials filed a lawsuit Monday that accuses the Sonics' owners of acting in bad faith and the team of playing lousy basketball.

    The lawsuit, which seeks to enforce the Sonics' KeyArena lease, came in response to Sonics owner Clay Bennett's announcement Friday that he was seeking arbitration to get out of the final two years of the lease.

    The city wants a court order forcing the team to play out its lease at KeyArena through September 2010 instead of paying a cash settlement to leave early.

    The suit, filed in King County Superior Court, also attempts to block Bennett from taking the dispute to arbitration, arguing that only a court can nullify the lease.

    Seattle City Attorney Tom Carr announced the lawsuit at a news conference with former U.S. Sen. Slade Gorton, whose law firm, K&L Gates, has been hired by the city for the lease dispute.

    "Too often, pro sports teams have run over local governments and gotten their way with them. Today we are standing up and saying 'no.' We have an agreement. We are going to enforce that agreement. We want you to honor your promises," Carr said.

    Neither Bennett nor the NBA would comment on the lawsuit Monday. Bennett has called KeyArena, even if renovated, "a dead end" and says he'll ask the league for permission to relocate the Sonics and Storm unless he gets a new arena deal by Oct. 31.

    In the arbitration papers filed last week, the Sonics argued that the public and local politicians have demonstrated that they don't care if the team leaves, making a cash buyout of the KeyArena lease a reasonable option.

    The city's lawsuit tries to turn the tables, accusing Bennett and his Oklahoma City-based ownership group of never intending to keep the Sonics in town. The suit also says the team, not KeyArena, is responsible for the Sonics' recent financial troubles.

    Bennett's arbitration demand last week blamed KeyArena — the smallest venue in the NBA — for the Sonics' mounting losses, which the team said reached $17 million last year.

    But Seattle officials countered that the losses have more to do with the team's spate of losing seasons.

    "The issues with the Sonics' profitability at KeyArena have less to do with KeyArena than perhaps the Sonics' ability to defend the high pick-and-roll," Carr said. "Good teams, compe ive teams have done well here."

    The city's lawsuit traces the Sonics' downfall to the 1998 NBA lockout, which diminished fan interest in professional basketball. The Sonics subsequently slid from their mid-1990s success on the court, suffering through a spate of mostly losing seasons in recent years. Annual attendance at games has fallen from more than 600,000 in the mid-1990s to 457,000 last year, according to the suit.

    The lawsuit also notes that Bennett has rejected offers from local businessmen who wanted to buy a piece of the team, and cites comments from part-owner Aubrey McClendon that "we didn't buy the team to keep it in Seattle."

    "Regrettably, almost from the beginning those Oklahoma owners gave every indication that they did not intend a longtime stay in the city of Seattle," Gorton said.

    Gorton called the owners' efforts to get a $500 million arena built in Renton, mostly with taxpayer money, "the kinds of demands that from my perspective were almost designed not to be met."

    The first issue a judge will have to decide in the lawsuit is whether the dispute belongs at the courthouse at all.

    Bennett's lawyers have argued the lease steers virtually all lease disputes between the city and team to binding arbitration. In that process, a panel of three neutral attorneys would decide which side wins.

    But the KeyArena lease says disputes over the "term," or length, of the lease are not subject to arbitration. Carr said that means the Sonics can't break their lease without going to court.

    If Seattle is able to keep the dispute in court, the argument will turn to whether a cash buyout is sufficient to compensate the city for the Sonics abandoning KeyArena early.

    Normally, landlords can't compel tenants to stay. But city officials argue this situation is unlike a standard landlord-tenant dispute, noting that KeyArena was built to meet the demands of previous Sonics owners.

    At the request of the Sonics, the Seattle City Council approved 20-year bonds in 1994 to pay for the renovation of the old Seattle Coliseum, which became KeyArena. The council initially balked at the 15-year lease term because the lease would end before the bonds were paid off. The city has estimated it will still owe $30 million on that renovation in 2010.

    "The city reluctantly agreed to a 15-year lease term in order to have the Sonics play here," Carr said. "We didn't agree to a 12- or 13-year lease term."

    Carr said it will take weeks, and perhaps several months, before the lawsuit is resolved.

    Brian Robinson, co-founder of the fan group Save Our Sonics and Storm, applauded the city's "aggressive stance" and said the NBA should think hard about whether to approve relocation requests from team owners who break leases.

    "Every NBA city has to be watching this action really closely," Robinson said.

  2. #2
    Silence surpasses speech. duncan228's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,693
    Another Seattle Newspaper's version: (Some overlap, but some other information.)

    http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/basket...3_arena25.html

    City sues Sonics to enforce arena lease
    Owner Bennett's bid for arbitration spurs move
    By GREG JOHNS

    While their long-term goal is to find a solution that would keep the Sonics permanently in Seattle, city officials drew their legal sword Monday and engaged in immediate battle with owner Clay Bennett over where the team will play in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 seasons.

    City Attorney Tom Carr filed a lawsuit in King County Superior Court to block the Sonics' attempt to get out of their KeyArena lease before it expires in 2010.

    The suit is a direct response to Bennett's decision to file a demand for arbitration Friday seeking relief from the final two years of the lease that he and his Oklahoma City ownership group inherited when they bought the Sonics and Storm 14 months ago.

    Carr and former U.S. Sen. Slade Gorton, representing Gorton's K&L Gates law firm, announced the countermove Monday at the firm's downtown office.

    "Too often, pro sports teams just run over local governments," Carr said. "Today we're standing up and saying, no, we have an agreement and we want to enforce that agreement and we want you to honor your promises."

    Carr said he expects this to be "a difficult bit of litigation," but said the primary issue is simple. The Sonics' lease extends through 2010 and the city expects that condition to be met.

    It will seek a judge's ruling to enforce the terms of the lease.

    Bennett and his lawyers didn't return calls Monday, but the ownership group filed its demand for arbitration on the belief that the city can't legally bind the team on the "specific performance" obligation of playing out its contract in an inadequate facility when the Sonics are claiming $17 million in losses for last season.

    The Oklahoma City group is willing to pay its remaining KeyArena rent under the lease, but wants the ability to move the Sonics and Storm after the 2007-08 season.

    Carr believes the city is en led to specific performance, meaning a financial buyout doesn't fulfill the team's obligation of playing its games at the facility the city rebuilt specifically for that purpose in 1994-95.

    "I can't imagine a set of facts where money damages were an adequate remedy to a city that went so far to provide a place for a professional team to play," he said.

    The city also believes the lease clearly states that length of the agreement is one of the issues not eligible for arbitration.

    Those points figure to make up the legal argument that could begin in a few months, with the court first deciding whether to halt the requested arbitration process and let the lawsuit proceed.

    Gorton said the city has "one simple request," that the Sonics fulfill the full 15 years of the lease agreement signed originally by owner Barry Ackerley and inherited when Bennett and his group bought the team from Howard Schultz. Gorton said Friday's arbitration request made it clear the new owners were intent on taking the teams to Oklahoma City.

    "This lawsuit," he said, "is designed to prevent that move."

    The suit challenges Bennett's claim that the team lost $17 million last year because of KeyArena's shortcomings. Carr noted that the franchise was profitable before the NBA lockout of 1999, but took a downturn with just two playoff appearances in the past seven years.

    "The issues with the Sonics' profitability at KeyArena have less to do with KeyArena than perhaps the Sonics' ability to defend the high pick-and-roll," Carr said. "Good teams, compe ive teams, have done well here. People of the city of Seattle have loved the SuperSonics for 40 years. For us to be at this stage is a very sad thing in that relationship."

    Gorton previously helped retain Major League Baseball in Seattle when, as attorney general, he filed suit after the Seattle Pilots' departure in 1969, the result being awarding of the Mariners expansion franchise in 1977. After becoming a U.S. senator, he also helped broker the Mariners' ownership sale to Nintendo that kept the team in Seattle in 1991 after owner Jeff Smulyan threatened a move to Florida.

    Gorton said recent published statements by Sonics minority owner Aubrey McClendon saying the intent has always been to wind up in Oklahoma City lent further credence to the belief the new group never was committed to Seattle.

    "Regrettably, almost from the beginning, those Oklahoma owners gave every indication they did not intend a longtime stay in Seattle," Gorton said.

    "They refused the request to have minority owners who were from Seattle. They incorporated the venture in Oklahoma. And more recently, one of the principal owners let the cat out of the bag by saying a move to Oklahoma was their design from the very beginning."

    Bennett addressed McClendon's statement last Friday, saying his ownership partner had suffered "a stroke moment" and doesn't remember making such comments. Bennett said the opinion does not mesh with his own and that he's been intent on finding a Seattle solution.

    Bennett has consistently said from the day he bought the Sonics that a new arena would be required to keep both the Sonics and Storm in Seattle. He set an Oct. 31 deadline for an arena deal to be in place, then filed the demand for arbitration on Friday while saying city officials have continually offered KeyArena as their only solution.

    Gorton said, "In talking about another new and highly expensive arena for basketball in the Seattle area, they made the kinds of demands that from my perspective were almost designed to not be met, with only an extremely modest contribution (from ownership) and a huge investment from taxpayers."

    Carr rejected Bennett's claim that Seattle officials aren't interested in the team, pointing to Mayor Greg Nickels' suggestion that the city would put up $100 million to rebuild the arena if the Sonics would match that figure.

    "The mayor went out on a very long political limb by offering $100 million and they didn't even return his phone calls," he said. "It's not the city of Seattle that said we don't want the Sonics. It's the Oklahoma ownership that has said we don't want the city of Seattle."

    Nickels recently committed $1 million to the expected legal battle. The Associated Press reported Monday that Gorton will be paid $685 an hour and fellow K&L Gates attorney Paul Lawrence will be paid $420 an hour, while some city attorney staff will also work the case.

    Ultimately, even a successful suit wouldn't do anything beyond binding the Sonics to KeyArena through September 2010.

    Gorton said the best outcome is building a permanent Sonics arena in the area and that remains the goal of both himself and Gov. Chris Gregoire.

    "This is a step in that direction," Gorton said. "Whether it means a change of mind of the present owners, their willingness to sell or some other situation, our long-term goal is a permanent Sonics presence here."

    Gorton brought Japanese businessman Hiroshi Yamauchi into the Mariners' ownership fold, though the Nintendo boss has never been to a game and the club is controlled by Seattle interests. Gorton left little question of his desired outcome with the Sonics.

    "My own personal view is that you're a lot better off with local owners," he said, "and I would hope that some would present themselves."

    Bennett said Friday the franchise is not for sale.

  3. #3
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    Let's hear it for burned coffee and suicidal songwriters!

    Still preferable to wealthy assclowns that fund anti-gay marraige initiatives.

  4. #4
    Better than you MajorMike's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,506
    Bwahaha. This proves that the city only cares for itself and its money, which I have been saying all along. They don't give one rat's iota about actually keeping the team, they just want the owner to pay them rent for the building. They call the team out in the actual lawsuit papers by "accuses ... the team of playing lousy basketball"??? Yes, that sounds like a city that is endured to it's team.

    After all the rejected proposals and failed initiatives and whining and complaining, Seattle has finally shown its true colors. All of the talk of how important the Sonics are to the city and how we all will miss them so and how they are 'our' team and no one else should have them is officially dead now. At no point in the lawsuit is the city asking for any profession of faith that they team will stay. It degrades the team and doesn't even try to use the arguement that they want them to stay. They only want them to play the last 2 years of their lease in Seattle.

    Is Bennett an ass for buying the team to move it? Probably. But how can one possibly on one hand condemn him when the city calls them out for sucking and doesn't care to keep them, just to make them wallow until their lease is up. Pathetic. I can't imagine how the players wouldn't completely want out now. Why play for a city that says you suck?

  5. #5
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    Sorry, but roaches and s > Clay Bennett and Howard Schultz. The solution is to let him buy out Shinn and take the Hornets back to OKC. NOLA is the market that should be left out in the cold.

    The whole point of forcing them to stay until the end of the lease is to buy time to come up with a way to keep the team in Seattle, either through a frustrated Bennett selling the team and looking for another avenue to bring basketball to OKC, or him actually working with the city. There's no way he's going to want to keep the team there for three lameduck years, and the NBA doesn't want to leave the Seattle market. This isn't about vindictiveness but buying time.

  6. #6
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    15,826
    I'm all for the Sonics going to OKC. That just means it'll be 3 years until Kevin Durant wants to leave that hole and go to a real city......like Dallas.

  7. #7
    Better than you MajorMike's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,506
    Sorry, but roaches and s > Clay Bennett and Howard Schultz. The solution is to let him buy out Shinn and take the Hornets back to OKC. NOLA is the market that should be left out in the cold.

    The whole point of forcing them to stay until the end of the lease is to buy time to come up with a way to keep the team in Seattle, either through a frustrated Bennett selling the team and looking for another avenue to bring basketball to OKC, or him actually working with the city. There's no way he's going to want to keep the team there for three lameduck years, and the NBA doesn't want to leave the Seattle market. This isn't about vindictiveness but buying time.
    Please this arguement is almost as stale as your constant "pre-Maloof brothers" arguement. There really is no need for you to add a new post to a Sonics/OKC thread if all you are going to post is, "pre-Maloof brothers", "buy out Shinn", or "good faith effort". We have heard all of that at least 4 times each, and it still is dumb.

    Seattle has no intention of keeping the Sonics long term. They have no intention of ever building a new arena. The public and the legislature have shown this long before Bennett showed up. The only thing Seattle cares about is getting its cash for the craphole building, because it will no doubt be demo'd as soon as the Sonics leave.

    To spin it any other way is just plain stupid. Call it for what it is. about Bennett leaving a big money hole in the city. about the jobs that will be lost. about the higher bureaucracy doing whatever the they want just to please themselves. But don't about how the city is fighting tooth and nail to keep their team in town. It just makes you look dumb.

  8. #8
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    But don't about how the city is fighting tooth and nail to keep their team in town. It just makes you look dumb.
    Arguing that suing to keep the team from breaking its lease means they want to keep it = dumb. Priceless.

    If all they wanted was to make money and didn't care about keeping the team, they'd negiotiate a buyout with Bennett. These are the not the actions of a city only concerned with its bottom line. It will probably be a day late and a dollar short, but they're about to enter into expensive litigation. To argue Seattle doesn't want to keep the Sonics is asinine.

  9. #9
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    74,377
    I'm all for the Sonics going to OKC. That just means it'll be 3 years until Kevin Durant wants to leave that hole and go to a real city......like Dallas.
    and dallas will have how much money?

  10. #10
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    15,826
    and dallas will have how much money?
    since when is money an obstacle for Cuban?

  11. #11
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    since when is money an obstacle for Cuban?
    not to mention Finley's contract should be gone by then. Perhaps Damp as well.

  12. #12
    BOOM!!!, Baby! Reggie Miller's Avatar
    My Team
    Indiana Pacers
    Post Count
    1,388
    My biggest concern is the name. My brain can't handle the "Oklahoma City Sonics." The "Utah Jazz" is bad enough.

    The powers that be probably want to keep the NBA in Seattle. Having a franchise in all three major sports is a major status symbol for a lot of people and a mark of being a "real" city. At least, it was always perceived that way in the cities in which I have lived without all three (Indianapolis and Tampa). I could be completely wrong, but these decisions are often made on bases other than pure economics.

  13. #13
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    My biggest concern is the name. My brain can't handle the "Oklahoma City Sonics." The "Utah Jazz" is bad enough.
    Oklahoma City Bombers? Too soon? I'm sure Bennett will want to put his own stamp on the franchise, and that means leaving the name and colors behind in Seattle.

    The powers that be probably want to keep the NBA in Seattle. Having a franchise in all three major sports is a major status symbol for a lot of people and a mark of being a "real" city. At least, it was always perceived that way in the cities in which I have lived without all three (Indianapolis and Tampa). I could be completely wrong, but these decisions are often made on bases other than pure economics
    OKC needs a team to be considered "big league." Seattle is just too important economically to the league. Even if the Sonics do leave, Seattle's strategy of lawyering up is a tactic to force the league to take care of them ala Cleveland and the new Browns.

  14. #14
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    15,826
    Even if the Sonics do leave, Seattle's strategy of lawyering up is a tactic to force the league to take care of them ala Cleveland and the new Browns.
    I hope not. Another expansion team is the last thing the NBA needs. The league is already watered down enough.

  15. #15
    I own Allanon mavs>spurs2's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    8,980
    since when is money an obstacle for Cuban?
    See:

    Nash
    Finley

  16. #16
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    15,826
    And the team got better once those guys were gone.

    Money wasn't the issue, it was value. It's not that he wouldn't have spent the money to keep them, the organization just felt that they weren't worth the money. And I agree. If Kevin Durant is worth the money and he wants to come to Dallas, money won't be an issue.

  17. #17
    BOOM!!!, Baby! Reggie Miller's Avatar
    My Team
    Indiana Pacers
    Post Count
    1,388
    Oklahoma City Bombers? Too soon? I'm sure Bennett will want to put his own stamp on the franchise, and that means leaving the name and colors behind in Seattle.
    Since the "Oilers" name has been retired by the NFL, that would seem a logical choice. Not being a Texan, my impression has been that enough bad feeling exists between Texas and Oklahoma that it might prevent OKC using the former name of a former Texas team. Am I too far off-base here?

  18. #18
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    Since the "Oilers" name has been retired by the NFL, that would seem a logical choice. Not being a Texan, my impression has been that enough bad feeling exists between Texas and Oklahoma that it might prevent OKC using the former name of a former Texas team. Am I too far off-base here?
    Tornadoes or Oilers would be good choices.

  19. #19
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    I hope not. Another expansion team is the last thing the NBA needs. The league is already watered down enough.
    You got two teams (Sonics, Hornets) and three markets (Sea, OKC, NOLA). For the health of the league, it's NOLA that should lose this game of musical chairs.

  20. #20
    Better than you MajorMike's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,506


    The old USFL team was the Outlaws.



    OKC had a couple of highly successful soccer teams (even if the leagues themselves were unsuccessful) in the 80's with the Oklahoma City Slickers and Oklahoma City Stampede. There was also an indoor league for over a dozen years that was the Oklahoma City Warriors. The Slickers name was reborn in the mid to late 90s with another soccer team in another defunct league.



    The OKC Stars was a very popular CHL team in the 80s. For whatever reason, pro hockey has always done very well in OKC. Of course the OKC Blazers are the hockey team now, and are easily the most successful minor league sports team of the past 15 years in any posrt, both in play and in fan draw.





    The OKC Cavalry were a CBA team in the 90s for almost a decade.




    Of course, the Redhawks (Rangers' minor league team) were the 89ers before they got the new Bricktown park and moved. The 89ers were always extremely popular and well attended, as well.





    There have also been defunct arena teams Oklahoma Wranglers and Yard Dawgz.




    Tulsa has some minor league teams named Roughnecks (soccer) Talons (AFL), Drillers (baseball), Oilers (hockey), 66ers (NDBL), Revolution (indoor soccer).

    I don't know why Sonics would be out of the question. Boeing actually has its 2nd largest presence of any place in the OKC area (Tinker AFB) and the world headquarters of Sonic Drive-In is in OKC. Plus if the Storm came, that name would obviously translate over, except for the fact there is already a USBL team named that.


  21. #21
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    97,883
    Good for Seattle. They approved that money for the renovation on the assumption they'd have the Sonics games pumping money into their economy for 15 years. To allow Bennett to break that lease would be ludicrous.

  22. #22
    BOOM!!!, Baby! Reggie Miller's Avatar
    My Team
    Indiana Pacers
    Post Count
    1,388
    Thanks, Capt. Mike. You covered my "learn something new every day" goal for Tuesday. I really like the "Outlaws" and "Wranglers" logos. Those would do very well, I think.

    I didn't know about Sonic Drive-Ins being franchised out of OKC. So, we aren't dealing with the same level of cognitive dissonance as "Utah Jazz." (Are Mormons even allowed to associate with jazz musicians? I suppose it's okay during their missionary obligation, right? But I kid the Latter Day Saints...)

    Still, I hate it when a team doesn't change it's name to fit its new city. "Indianapolis Colts" never worked for me. Of course, I don't know what else to call them. Indy has about as much personality as any other rust belt city, i.e. very little. Here's the best I could come up with for the Colts:

    1. The Indianapolis Capital Flight (Problem: too accurate);
    2. The Indianapolis "Hey, At Least We're Not Gary, Indiana!" (Problem: not accurate enough);
    3. The Indianapolis Cults (Problem: Dungy wouldn't approve. One major benefit: Changing logos would only require changing one letter and making the horseshoe a pentagram.)

    If anyone has any further suggestions, please feel free...

  23. #23
    This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend sandman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    1,434
    Bwahaha. This proves that the city only cares for itself and its money, which I have been saying all along. They don't give one rat's iota about actually keeping the team, they just want the owner to pay them rent for the building. They call the team out in the actual lawsuit papers by "accuses ... the team of playing lousy basketball"??? Yes, that sounds like a city that is endured to it's team.

    After all the rejected proposals and failed initiatives and whining and complaining, Seattle has finally shown its true colors. All of the talk of how important the Sonics are to the city and how we all will miss them so and how they are 'our' team and no one else should have them is officially dead now. At no point in the lawsuit is the city asking for any profession of faith that they team will stay. It degrades the team and doesn't even try to use the arguement that they want them to stay. They only want them to play the last 2 years of their lease in Seattle.

    Is Bennett an ass for buying the team to move it? Probably. But how can one possibly on one hand condemn him when the city calls them out for sucking and doesn't care to keep them, just to make them wallow until their lease is up. Pathetic. I can't imagine how the players wouldn't completely want out now. Why play for a city that says you suck?
    Clearly I don't have as big a stake as you do in this little drama, but I would state that the at ude of the city changed significantly after the $250,000 statement by McClendon. You would be arguing from a very biased viewpoint to state that the city ONLY cared about the money.

    When they assumed the team was going to stay based on the good faith agreement at the time of the sale, they did not have any concerns regarding the recoupment of the bond investment, because the Sonics were going to continue to play at KeyArena and the revenue generation would still be in place.

    Now that the new owners are emphatic about moving out, the city had to take a look at the fact that the bonds were already going to be short-changed because they only held the Sonics to a 15 year lease. This was probably a poor financial decision on their part, because they more than likely assumed they could extend the lease at some point or go into another bond purchase.

    Nevertheless, it is not unethical, immoral or illegal for the city to want the team to honor the terms of the lease. Additionally, a buyout would not be good for the city because it would only cover the lease agreement and not account for the lost peripheral revenue that cascades throughout the community. How many jobs are lost? How many restaurants/bars lose revenue? Etc. Etc. Etc.

    While the city government may get their money through a settlement, the city would be subject to a severe financial hit over the annulled remaining years. In my opinion, that is what the city is fighting for, and that is not a bad thing. It may not sit well with Oklahomans who only justify the shennanigans of the new owners because they are the recipients of the new team, but to the rest of us it is easy to see that the city of Seattle is protecting its assets.

  24. #24
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    45,483
    If OKC wants the team bad enough, they'll just flat out pay the last two years rent in Seattle. The only thing that Seattle is en led to is the rent money. Nothing says the Sonics actually have to play their games there.

    Seattle's ed. Stern himself was involved a year or two ago, and said it was the worst arena and lease deal in the league. Now, they've made it clear that there is no new arena on the horizon. The Sonics are leaving. It's just a matter of when.

  25. #25
    Better than you MajorMike's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,506
    From the Seattle Times
    Seattle Times


    Who Said He Had A Heart Of Dust? Oklahoma City Sonics owner Clay Bennett announced that renewing season-ticket holders won't be charged a price increase to watch the lame-duck team at KeyArena. It's a kind gesture to the team's loyal fans, and all 12 of them are said to be giving it serious consideration.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •