Reply With Quote
the only one worth listening to.
MSNBC 8pm CDT
the only one worth listening to.
vBookie on how many questions are posed to him specifically and how much air time he gets.
Another vBookie, over-under, on how many times Guiliani says "9/11" and "terrorists".
My guess:
RP questions : between 1-3 Total air time: less than 4 mins
Guliani "9/11": between 13.5 Guliani "terrorists": 22.5
Last edited by DarkReign; 10-09-2007 at 11:56 AM.
Julie's new buzzword is that he's "electable" over Hillary, while the other's aren't.
If not tonight, he will be robotically trumpeting 9/11 as his calling card to any national presence. He's an unpleasant, hot-header, imprudent bully of a mother er desperately trying to pander to right-wingers by negating his anti-gun-crime campaign in NYC and his views on abortion.
Considering where this debate is being held, I'm guessing "free trade" just might come up as an issue...MSNBC 8pm CDT
LOL @ Guillaini and always saying 9/11.
hopefully his wife won't forget he's @ a debate and will leave him alone.
actual quotes from the dumbphony politicians (ron paul aside):
"WE ARE IN A RACE FOR OUR LIVES AGAINST PEOPLE WHO WANT TO KILL US AND TAKE OUR JOBS"
"Let the lawyers settle it out" (re: war technicalities)
"islamofacsist terrorist"
laughable
now drag queen is mentioning Hillary.
all this guy does is say MEDIA WORDS and expect 2 get votes thru controversy/ sympathy.
Brownback: We are the best ,"This Place Rocks!"
(applause)
WTF? they are really playing on emotions today.
one thing is clear in this debate:
the repub party does not want even 40% of the vote come next november.
I don't understand, is it on now or at 8?
So I'm going to take a stab and say since the "big four" will be there no Black people will be in attendance
RON PAUL SUPPORTERS VOTE FOR HIM WINNING THE DEBATE:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/21209903/
It apparently has already occurred, though I'm not sure if it has been broadcast yet.
Done.
Ron Paul winning with ~75% of the vote on all 3 questions.
they couldn't have ignored Paul anymore if they tried.
So I guess it was already broadcast.
These Repug jerkoffs are pandering the way their handlers tell them to pander, saying that people tell the campaign they want to hear.
This is American political discourse, scrupulously adapted to please the sheeple and 'rouse the rabble. What a pathetic bunch of inauthentic clowns, scoring cheap points, being "manly" and tough. "Not worth a pitcher of warm spit!"
Paul is the glaring exception to the rule, stands out because he has smidgen of authtencity and straight talking.
boutons didn't need to actually view the debate nor read any of the reviews for that response.
Thompson is woefully out of step. He looks lost.
Guiliani Guiliaied ron paul AGAIN!
He scoffed the out of Paul about 9/11 using 9/11 rhetoric and the crowd bought it hook line and sinker
this nation is doomed.
The crowd goes ape over the crappy tax joke from Romney, but barely musters a golf clap when Ron Paul explains the debasement of our currency. America is re ed.
Guilianni kicks ass.
By far the best candidate in this election...he's on the right side of nearly every issue.
Paul make speak of nice ideals...but nothing he says works in the real world. Long on knowledge and a by the book credo...short on common sense.
Guilianni is 100% common sense.
Common sense > Ideals
*Braces self for all the people who voted for John Kerry in the last election to pile on*
A candidate that makes 100% sense is still a re in my book if he is blatantly riding on that 9/11 crap.
What you say about Paul can be argued, but with all the unprecedented power the Bush administration has instilled in the Executive Branch, maybe Paul's ideals could go into effect if he pulled the upset.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
